Physiology Optimized Versus Angio-guided PCI
AQVA-II
Angio- or Microcatheter- Quantified FFR Virtual PCI Versus Angio-guided PCI in the Achievement of an Optimal Post-PCI FFR
1 other identifier
interventional
305
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Virtual Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) plan is superior to conventional angiography-guided PCI in obtaining a good final physiology result, which is, in turn, associated with better prognosis. This has been demonstrated in a population with a relatively low lesion complexity. Therefore, whether angiography-based FFR virtual PCI could guarantee the same results in some complex anatomical settings (tortuous or calcific vessels, tandem or bifurcation lesions) is not known, also given the inherent limitations of the 3Dimensional (3D)-reconstruction. The ability of invasive FFR to achieve the same result if compared to angiography-guided PCI has been questioned by recent studies. Recent technological developments, namely the design of pressure wire microcatheters may allow an easier handling of the procedural planning and guidance. The rationale of the AQVA II study is to test whether a longitudinal FFR-based virtual PCI either angio- or microcatheter- derived is able to improve the post-PCI physiology value if compared to angio-guided PCI in complex and high-risk indicated procedures (CHIP).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
Started Dec 2022
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 7, 2024
CompletedDecember 12, 2024
December 1, 2024
7 months
December 1, 2022
December 7, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Post-PCI Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)
At the end of the procedure in all patient a blinded invasive post-PCI FFR will be obtained
at the end of the procedure (at the moment of the last angiography)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
VOCE
1 year
Post-PCI Distal Pressure (Pd) / Aortic Pressure (Pa)
at the end of the procedure (at the moment of the last angiography)
Study Arms (3)
Angiography-guided PCI
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive PCI according to the interpretation of angiography findings by the Interventional Cardiologist.
Microcatheter-derived FFR
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive PCI according to the plan derived from the interpretation of the FFR pullback obtained with microcatheter FFR performed by the Interventional Cardiologist before and after PCI.
Angiography-derived FFR
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive PCI according to the plan derived from the interpretation of the FFR pullback obtained with angiography-derived FFR performed by the Interventional Cardiologist before PCI. The angiography-derived FFR can be repeated after PCI to check the results and eventually apply correcting maneuvers.
Interventions
FFR pullback trace is obtained through the manual retrieval performed after the positioning of the microcatheter FFR in the distal portion of the vessel. The pullback speed should be steady and the overall duration would be between 20 and 40 seconds. Then, the Interventional Cardiologist has to decide the procedural plan according to the pullback trace aiming to obtain an optimal post-PCI result in terms of physiology. FFR with pullback can be repeated after stenting to check and correct the result if needed.
FFR pullback trace is automatically obtained after the 3-Dimensional reconstruction of the vessel through angiography derived FFR. Then, Interventional Cardiologist has to decide the procedural plan according to the pullback result aiming to obtain an optimal post-PCI result in terms of physiology. Angiography-derived FFR can be repeated after stenting to check and correct the result if needed.
Interventional Cardiologist will perform PCI plan according to his/her the evaluation of angiography.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Indication to PCI for either acute or chronic coronary syndrome
- Signed informed consent
- At least one of the following CHIP lesion characteristic:
- Long lesion (\>28 mm);
- Tandem lesions;
- Severe calcifications;
- Severe tortuosity;
- True bifurcation lesions: involving a significant (\> 50%) diameter stenosis both in the main vessel and side branch (i.e. MEDINA 1,1,1; 1,0,1; or 0,1,1) and with a relevant side branch, namely ≥2.00 mm;
- In-stent restenosis (ISR).
- Left main stem disease.
You may not qualify if:
- Planned surgical revascularization
- Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery
- Culprit lesion of STEMI or NSTEMI
- Revascularization of a chronic total occlusion
- Non-cardiovascular co-morbidity reducing life expectancy to \< 1 year
- Any factor precluding 1-year follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
University Hospital of Ferrara
Cona, Ferrara, 44124, Italy
Santa Maria Goretti Hospital
Latina, LT, Italy
Related Publications (2)
Biscaglia S, Verardi FM, Erriquez A, Colaiori I, Cocco M, Cantone A, Pompei G, Marrone A, Caglioni S, Tumscitz C, Penzo C, Manfrini M, Leone AM, Versaci F, Campo G. Coronary Physiology Guidance vs Conventional Angiography for Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The AQVA-II Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Jan 22;17(2):277-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.10.032. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
PMID: 37902150BACKGROUNDMarrone A, Erriquez A, Verardi FM, Colaiori I, Cocco M, Caglioni S, Tumscitz C, Penzo C, Marchini F, Meinen J, McNutt J, Buijs JOD, Chiu WC, Versaci F, Campo G, Biscaglia S. Additional Value of Optical Coherence Tomography-Derived Virtual Flow Reserve for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Guidance. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Dec;106(7):3456-3464. doi: 10.1002/ccd.70207. Epub 2025 Sep 23.
PMID: 40988408DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The Independent Clinical Event Committee will perform the blinded adjudication of the events. The Independent Angiography and Physiology Core-lab will perform the primary endpoint analysis
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Study Chair
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2022
First Posted
December 21, 2022
Study Start
December 1, 2022
Primary Completion
June 20, 2023
Study Completion
December 7, 2024
Last Updated
December 12, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share