Evaluation of Advanced Airway Methods Applied to Patients Who Were Awakened Due to Difficult Airway in Another Center or Who Were Predicted to Have Difficult Airway in Preoperative Evaluation
Sponsor study identifier
observational
49
1 country
1
Study Start
December 30, 2023
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
December 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Actual (reported)In this study, the investigators will evaluate the advanced airway methods applied in the anesthesiology and reanimation clinic of the hospital to patients who met the criteria for awake intubation specified in the ASA 2022 difficult airway management guideline or who could not be intubated after induction of anesthesia in another center. The advanced airway method applied to the difficult airway patient expected in the operating room, the duration, success and complications of the method will be observed and recorded.
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
December 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
December 30, 2023
Actual (reported)February 19, 2024
Actual (reported)February 28, 2024
Actual (reported)December 30, 2024
Actual (reported)December 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Comparison of advanced airway methods in the awake patient with difficult airway.
Comparison of the superiority of advanced airway methods applied to the expected difficult airway patient in the operating room. The number of attempts and duration for successful intubation between groups will be examined.
1 year
awake nasal fiberoptic intubation
awake intubation with laryngeal mask airway-mediated aintree catheter
awake intubation with videolaryngoscopy
awake nasal fiberoptic intubation
awake intubation with laryngeal mask airway-mediated aintree catheter
Patients who were previously evaluated for difficult airway criteria and predicted to have a difficult airway or who could not be ventilated or intubated after induction of anesthesia in another center.
Kocaeli City Hospital
Kocaeli, Turkey (Türkiye)
Yilmaz M, Yuksek A, Civraz AZT, Kara MY, Candan S, Saracoglu KT, Saracoglu A. Supraglottic airway devices in awake tracheal intubation: a viable alternative to fiberoptic and video laryngoscopy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Oct 7;25(1):485. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03331-4.
Mehmet Yilmaz
Kocaeli City Hospital Anesthesiology and Reanimation
49 participants (actual enrollment reported by the registry).
First Submitted
February 19, 2024
First Posted
February 28, 2024
Study Start
December 30, 2023
Actual (reported)Retrospective Data Analysis With the Aim to Determine the Success Rate of Endotracheal Intubation in the First Attempt in the Zug Rescue Service With Various Airway Devices Already in Everyday Use
awake intubation with videolaryngoscopy
Registry-reported names are shown in full. Names without a link have not yet been matched to a Syfrah profile.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Primary Completion
December 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Study Completion
December 30, 2024
Actual (reported)Last Updated
January 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Download the complete ClinicalTrials.gov record imported by Syfrah, including fields not shown in this page. The registry may contain a newer revision.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov.
JSON downloads include source attribution and retrieval details alongside the unchanged original record or the separately normalized values.
Source retrieved: