Videolaryngoscopy for Intubation in Patients With Diabetes
Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
1 other identifier
interventional
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The use of videolarygoscopy (VL) as first choice for tracheal intubation versus direct laryngoscopy (DL) is a matter of debate. These two methods were compared in several studies. Videolaryngoscopes may reduce the number of failed intubations, particularly among patients presenting with a difficult airway. They improve the glottic view and may reduce airway trauma. DM is accepted as a risk factor for difficult intubation. The aim of this study is to compare VL to DL in adult patients requiring tracheal intubation for anesthesia, in terms of intubation success, glottic view quality, intubation failure, intubation time, conversion to another laringoscopy method and adverse outcomes related to tracheal intubation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 19, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 25, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 25, 2018
CompletedApril 25, 2019
March 1, 2017
1.7 years
March 19, 2017
April 24, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
first-attempt intubation success rate
successful intubation with the allocated device
first second after intubation
intubation time
The time elapsed between the passage of the larygoscope through the teeth and the detection of ETCO2
0-120 seconds after intubation
intubation difficulty
number of attempts, number of operators, number of alternative techniques, CL grade, lifting force, laryngeal pressure, position of the vocal cords,
0-12 seconds after intubation
Secondary Outcomes (4)
glottic view quality
during laringoscopy
percentage of glottic opening
during laringoscopy
the rate of conversion to another laryngoscopy method
5 seconds after the first attempt to intubate
adverse outcomes related to tracheal intubation.
1 minute after intubation
Study Arms (2)
Videolaryngoscopy
EXPERIMENTALthe trachea will be intubated using a videolaringoscope
Direct laringoscopy
ACTIVE COMPARATORthe trachea will be intubated using a laringoscope
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing elective surgery
- Patients needing endotracheal intubation
- Patients having diabetes mellitus
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Health Sciences Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Training and Research Hospital
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Lingappan K, Arnold JL, Shaw TL, Fernandes CJ, Pammi M. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 18;(2):CD009975. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009975.pub2.
PMID: 25691129BACKGROUNDDonoghue AJ, Ades AM, Nishisaki A, Deutsch ES. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in simulated pediatric intubation. Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;61(3):271-7. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.09.008. Epub 2012 Oct 18.
PMID: 23083969BACKGROUNDvan Zundert A, Maassen R, Lee R, Willems R, Timmerman M, Siemonsma M, Buise M, Wiepking M. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways. Anesth Analg. 2009 Sep;109(3):825-31. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae39db.
PMID: 19690253BACKGROUNDHofstetter C, Scheller B, Flondor M, Gerig HJ, Heidegger T, Brambrink A, Thierbach A, Wilhelm W, Wrobel M, Zwissler B. [Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for elective endotracheal intubation]. Anaesthesist. 2006 May;55(5):535-40. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-0998-3. German.
PMID: 16688385BACKGROUNDLewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub2.
PMID: 27844477BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dilek Yazicioglu, Assoc Prof
Netherlands: Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Proffesor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 19, 2017
First Posted
March 24, 2017
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Primary Completion
November 25, 2018
Study Completion
November 25, 2018
Last Updated
April 25, 2019
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share