Predictors of Difficult Videolaryngoscopy

NCT03495596 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: Videolaryngoscopy
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 1,159
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The primary goal of this study was to identify parameters affecting the failure of videolaryngoscopy in clinical practice; secondly, the incidence of videolaryngoscopy use and the most frequently used patient groups.

Conditions

Videolaryngoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Intubation success

  The success of intubation attempt with videolaryngoscopy (yes/no)

  15 minutes

Secondary Outcomes (4)

• The reason of videolaryngoscopy

  15 minutes

• The type of videolaryngoscopy blade

  15 minutes

• The rescue technique

  30 minutes

• Factors affecting success of videolaryngoscopy

  30 minutes

Study Arms (1)

Videolaryngoscopy patients

The patients who were attempted to be intubated with videolaryngoscopy

Device: Videolaryngoscopy

Interventions

Videolaryngoscopy DEVICE

Videolaryngoscopy device type

Videolaryngoscopy patients

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 1 Day - 95 Years
• Sex: all
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who will undergo surgery under general anesthesia will be followed in Hacettepe University Hospital's operating room. All patients aged 0-95 years who used videolaryngoscopy will be included in the study.

You may qualify if:

• All patients who used videolaryngoscopy for intubation

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Hacettepe University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Hacettepe University Hospital

Ankara, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (15)

• Aziz MF, Bayman EO, Van Tienderen MM, Todd MM; StAGE Investigator Group; Brambrink AM. Predictors of difficult videolaryngoscopy with GlideScope(R) or C-MAC(R) with D-blade: secondary analysis from a large comparative videolaryngoscopy trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;117(1):118-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew128.

  PMID: 27317711 BACKGROUND

• el-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg. 1996 Jun;82(6):1197-204. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199606000-00017.

  PMID: 8638791 BACKGROUND

• Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182023eb7.

  PMID: 21150569 BACKGROUND

• Toshniwal G, McKelvey GM, Wang H. STOP-Bang and prediction of difficult airway in obese patients. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Aug;26(5):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jul 28.

  PMID: 25081584 BACKGROUND

• Nakao K, Komasawa N, Kusaka Y, Minami T. Rapid-Sequence Intubation in the Left-Lateral Tilt Position in a Pregnant Woman with Premature Placental Abruption Utilizing a Videolaryngoscope. AJP Rep. 2015 Apr;5(1):e30-2. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1544109. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

  PMID: 26199794 BACKGROUND

• Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, Savoldelli GL, Nabecker S, Theiler LG. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):670-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew058.

  PMID: 27106971 BACKGROUND

• Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985 Jul;32(4):429-34. doi: 10.1007/BF03011357.

  PMID: 4027773 BACKGROUND

• Wilson ME, Spiegelhalter D, Robertson JA, Lesser P. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Aug;61(2):211-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/61.2.211.

  PMID: 3415893 BACKGROUND

• Nath G, Sekar M. Predicting difficult intubation--a comprehensive scoring system. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1997 Oct;25(5):482-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9702500505.

  PMID: 9352759 BACKGROUND

• Benumof JL. Management of the difficult adult airway. With special emphasis on awake tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1991 Dec;75(6):1087-110. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199112000-00021.

  PMID: 1824555 BACKGROUND

• Williamson JA, Webb RK, Szekely S, Gillies ER, Dreosti AV. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Difficult intubation: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):602-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100518.

  PMID: 8273882 BACKGROUND

• Nichol HC, Zuck D. Difficult laryngoscopy--the "anterior" larynx and the atlanto-occipital gap. Br J Anaesth. 1983 Feb;55(2):141-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.2.141.

  PMID: 6830676 BACKGROUND

• Oates JD, Macleod AD, Oates PD, Pearsall FJ, Howie JC, Murray GD. Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1991 Mar;66(3):305-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/66.3.305.

  PMID: 2015145 BACKGROUND

• Charters P, Perera S, Horton WA. Visibility of pharyngeal structures as a predictor of difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 1987 Oct;42(10):1115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb05182.x. No abstract available.

  PMID: 3688398 BACKGROUND

• Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105-11.

  PMID: 6507827 BACKGROUND

Study Officials

• Aysun Ankay Yilbas, MD

  Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

  STUDY DIRECTOR

• Sevilay Kivrakoglu, MD

  Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: CROSS SECTIONAL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: HacettepeU

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 5, 2018
• First Posted: April 12, 2018
• Study Start: January 17, 2018
• Primary Completion: March 1, 2020
• Study Completion: March 1, 2020
• Last Updated: April 12, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Locations

TU (1)