NCT06277401

Brief Summary

Pain associated with knee joint hypermobility is common in the adult population, but evidence on treatment is sparse. This study investigates if high-load resistance training is superior to usual care in improving activity-related pain in young patients (18-45 years) with hypermobile joints and knee pain.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
19mo left

Started Feb 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress58%
Feb 2024Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 9, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 21, 2024

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 26, 2024

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

February 9, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 28, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

HypermobilityKnee painTreatmentRandomised controlled trial

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analogue Scale Nominated Activity

    The primary outcome is the Self-reported knee pain during an activity nominated by patients to be the most aggravating for their present knee pain (VAS nominated activity - VASNA, 0-100, 100 = worse). The primary endpoint is at 12-week follow-up.

    Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks (primary endpoint), 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    Baseline, 12 weeks, 12 months

  • Adverse events

    Up to 12 months

  • Dynamic knee strength

    Baseline, 12 weeks

  • Knee reposition sense

    Baseline, 12 weeks

  • Single-Leg-Hop for Distance

    Baseline, 12 weeks

Other Outcomes (13)

  • Knee pain past week

    Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 12 months

  • Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) 11 item

    Baseline, 12 weeks, 12 months

  • EQ-5D-5L

    Baseline, 12 weeks, 12 months

  • +10 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Progressive high-load resistance training program performed twice weekly for 12 weeks

Other: High-load strength training for the knee

Standard care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The standard care group will receive instructions on a neuromuscular training program with focus on knee stability and function performed at low intensities to be conducted twice weekly for 12 weeks

Other: Neuromuscular training for the knee

Interventions

The exercise programme includes exercises identified in literature to target muscles around the knee.

Standard care

The exercise programme includes exercises identified in literature to target muscles around the knee.

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Persistent knee pain for ≥ 3 months (self-reported)
  • Knee pain ≥ 30mm during the last week using a 0-100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS; 0=no pain and 100=worst imaginable pain) (self-reported)
  • Generalised joint hypermobility assessed with the Five-Part Hypermobility Questionnaire (positive ≥ 2/5) (self-reported)
  • Local knee joint hypermobility using the passive hyperextension of the knee in standing (positive \> 10 degrees of hyperextension) and confirmed in supine lying (heel resting on 20 cm high block on the bench surface), with passive knee hyperextension (positive \> 10 degrees) (objectively measured)

You may not qualify if:

  • Diagnosed with patellar tendinopathy
  • Pregnancy or childbirth within the past year (due to increased levels of relaxin that could affect joint stability)
  • Knee surgery within the past year
  • Participation in regular structured resistance training within the past six months
  • Inability to speak and understand Danish.
  • All types of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome
  • Other heritable connective tissue disorders such as Marfan syndrome, osteogenesis imperfecta, Loeys-Dietz syndrome, Stickler syndrome, skeletal dysplasias
  • Autoimmune rheumatic connective tissue disorders such as lupus, rheumatoid arthritis; Chromosomal conditions such as Fragile X syndrome, Kabuki syndrome, Down syndrome
  • Neuromuscular disorders that can cause joints to become unstable, such as multiple sclerosis

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Physiotherapy Clinics Region of Southern Denmark

Odense, Fyn, 5000, Denmark

RECRUITING

University of Southern Denmark

Odense, Fyn, 5230, Denmark

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Liaghat B, Bojsen-Moller J, Juul-Kristensen B, Henriksen P, Mohammadnejad A, Heiberg BD, Thorlund JB. High-load strength training compared with standard care treatment in young adults with joint hypermobility and knee pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the HIPEr-Knee study). BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 16;14(10):e090812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090812.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Joint Instability

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Joint DiseasesMusculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Behnam Liaghat, PhD

    University of Southern Denmark

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Jonas B Thorlund, PhD

    University of Southern Denmark

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Central Study Contacts

Behnam Liaghat, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
The patients will be kept blind to treatment allocation by being provided with minimal information about the content of the two exercise interventions and the study hypotheses; the patients will be informed that the study compares two different exercise protocols that both include safe exercises to reduce knee pain and increase knee function. An independent biostatistician blinded to group allocation will perform the primary RCT analysis. To reduce the risk of interpretation bias, blinded results from the analyses (group A compared with group B) will be presented to all authors, who will agree on two alternative written interpretations before the data manager unblinds the randomisation code.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2024

First Posted

February 26, 2024

Study Start

February 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 29, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations