NCT06270238

Brief Summary

The objective of this study was to determine the effects of protocols of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy based on the functional reserve of each hemiplegic stroke patient in subacute phase, compared to conventional low-frequency rTMS therapy on contralateral M1. Investigators hypothesized that the functional reserve of each hemiplegic stroke patient will be different, and therefore an appropriate simulating target for rTMS therapy is needed. In addition, this approach could be more effective compared to conventional protocols applied to stroke patients regardless of their severity, predicted mechanism of motor function recovery, or functional reserves.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
5mo left

Started Feb 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable stroke

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress85%
Feb 2024Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 13, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 13, 2024

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 21, 2024

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2026

Last Updated

April 24, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submit

April 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

StrokerTMSFunctional reserve

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score of Upper Extremity (FMA-UL)

    Measurement for motor function of upper limb. Minimum: 0, Maximum: 66. Higher score means a better

    From baseline T0 to Post-intervention T2 (2 weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (23)

  • Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score of Upper Extremity (FMA-UL)

    From baseline T0 to During-intervention T1 (1 week)

  • Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score of Upper Extremity (FMA-UL)

    From baseline T0 to Follow-up T3 (2 months)

  • Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score (FMA)

    From baseline T0 to During-intervention T1 (1 week)

  • Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score (FMA)

    From baseline T0 to Post-intervention T2 (2 weeks)

  • Differences of Fugl-Meyer Assessment score (FMA)

    From baseline T0 to Follow-up T3 (2 months)

  • +18 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (6)

High-Frequency1

EXPERIMENTAL

Confirmed responses in TMS-induced MEP: Preserved ipsilateral corticospinal tract. High-frequency rTMS over ipsilateral primary motor cortex will be applied.

Device: High-Frequency1

cTBS1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Confirmed responses in TMS-induced MEP: Preserved ipsilateral corticospinal tract. continous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS) protocol of rTMS over contralateral primary motor cortex will be applied.

Device: cTBS1

High-Frequency2

EXPERIMENTAL

Absent responses in TMS-induced MEPs, but confirmed corticospinal tract integrity in DTI; Preserved ipsilateral alternative corticospinal tract. High-frequency rTMS over ipsilateral premotor cortex will be applied.

Device: High-Frequency2

cTBS2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Absent responses in TMS-induced MEPs, but confirmed corticospinal tract integrity in DTI; Preserved ipsilateral alternative corticospinal tract. continous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS) protocol of rTMS over contralateral primary motor cortex will be applied.

Device: cTBS2

High-Frequency3

EXPERIMENTAL

Absent responses in all ipsilateral corticospinal tract. High-frequency rTMS over contralateral primary motor cortex will be applied.

Device: High-Frequency3

cTBS3

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Absent responses in all ipsilateral corticospinal tract. continous Theta Burst Stimulation (cTBS) protocol of rTMS over contralateral primary motor cortex will be applied.

Device: cTBS3

Interventions

rTMS intervention: 20 sessions of 10-Hz rTMS at 90% resting motor threshold (RMT), 50 pulses per session with a 25-second interval between sessions, totaling 1,000 pulses. rTMS target: ipsilateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

High-Frequency1
cTBS1DEVICE

rTMS intervention: 40 seconds of cTBS at 70% RMT, totaling 600 pulses. rTMS target: contralateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

cTBS1

rTMS intervention: 20 sessions of 10-Hz rTMS at 90% RMT, 50 pulses per session with a 25-second interval between sessions, totaling 1,000 pulses. rTMS target: ipsilateral premotor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

High-Frequency2
cTBS2DEVICE

rTMS intervention: 40 seconds of cTBS at 70% RMT, totaling 600 pulses. rTMS target: contralateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

cTBS2

rTMS intervention: 20 sessions of 10-Hz rTMS at 90% RMT, 50 pulses per session with a 25-second interval between sessions, totaling 1,000 pulses. rTMS target: contralateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

High-Frequency3
cTBS3DEVICE

rTMS intervention: 40 seconds of cTBS at 70% RMT, totaling 600 pulses. rTMS target: contralateral primary motor cortex. Total rTMS sessions: once a day, 5 days per week, for 2 weeks, totaling 10 sessions. Additional treatment: inpatient conventional rehabilitation therapy, consisting of occupational and physical therapy for 30 minutes each, twice daily, for 2 weeks, as well as the routine pharmacotherapy based on the guidelines for management of patients with stroke.

cTBS3

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • hemiplegic stroke patients in the subacute phase (7 days to 3 months from the onset) who are currently hospitalized,
  • FMA score of the upper extremity ≤42,
  • adequate language and cognitive function to perform at least a 1-step obey-command,
  • pre-stroke functional level of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤1,
  • aged ≥19 years old,
  • patients willing to sign the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • those with contraindications to rTMS, such as epilepsy, implanted metal objects in the head, or a history of craniotomy,
  • those with progressive of hemodynamically unstable medical conditions,
  • those with coexisting neurological conditions, such as spinal cord injury or Parkinson's disease,
  • those with major psychiatric disorders, such as major depression, schizophrenia, or dementia,
  • those having contraindications to conduct an MRI study,
  • those who are pregnant or lactating ,
  • patients who have refused to participate in this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Samsung Medical Center

Seoul, 06351, South Korea

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Lee HS, Kim DH, Seo HG, Im S, Yoo YJ, Kim NY, Lee J, Kim D, Park HY, Yoon MJ, Kim YS, Kim H, Chang WH. Efficacy of personalized rTMS to enhance upper limb function in subacute stroke patients: a protocol for a multi-center, randomized controlled study. Front Neurol. 2024 Jul 3;15:1427142. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1427142. eCollection 2024.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Study Officials

  • Won Hyuk Chang, PhD

    Samsung Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Won Hyuk Chang, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The participants, assessors, and investigators will be blinded, not be aware of the group allocation. Statistical analysis will also be conducted by data analysts without awareness of the group allocation. Only clinicians applying rTMS intervention will not be blinded, as they will apply rTMS over different stimulation sites based on the protocols. Blinding will be continued until the end of the study, including data analysis.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: prospective, single-blind with blind observer, parallel-group design, multi-center, randomized controlled clinical trial
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2024

First Posted

February 21, 2024

Study Start

February 13, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Last Updated

April 24, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations