Individualized Brain Stimulation Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Simulation in Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
24
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study is to investigate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) simulation-based individualized stimulation compared to conventional stimulation and sham stimulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Jan 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 7, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 29, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 23, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 23, 2022
CompletedFebruary 3, 2023
February 1, 2023
1.9 years
January 5, 2021
February 1, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Changes in motor evoked potential
Resting motor threshold (rMT), amplitude, and latency of motor evoked potential in the first dorsal interosseous muscle are measured. These outcomes are measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the motor hotspot. The rMT is defined as the minimum stimulus intensity that produced a minimal motor evoked response at rest. The amplitude means peak to peak of the muscle response. The latency is defined as the time point from the onset of the stimulus to the onset of MEP.
Baseline, 1 day (immediately after one brain stimulation session) and about 14 days (immediately after five brain stimulation sessions)
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Jebsen-Taylor hand function test
Baseline, 1 day (immediately after one brain stimulation session) and about 14 days (immediately after five brain stimulation sessions)
9-hole peg test
Baseline, 1 day (immediately after one brain stimulation session) and about 14 days (immediately after five brain stimulation sessions)
Grip & Tip pinch strength test
Baseline, 1 day (immediately after one brain stimulation session) and about 14 days (immediately after five brain stimulation sessions)
Box & Block test
Baseline, 1 day (immediately after one brain stimulation session) and about 14 days (immediately after five brain stimulation sessions)
Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Baseline, 1 day (immediately after one brain stimulation session) and about 14 days (immediately after five brain stimulation sessions)
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Individualized stimulation group
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive five sessions of individualized stimulation obtained from brain image-based transcranial direct stimulation simulation. The simulator generates the electrode's location on the scalp.
Conventional stimulation group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive five sessions of conventional stimulation with electrodes over C3 and C4 based on the 10-20 system.
Sham stimulation group
SHAM COMPARATORPatients receive five sessions of sham stimulation with electrodes over C3 and C4 based on the 10-20 system.
Interventions
Transcranial direct current stimulation is a form of noninvasive neuromodulation that uses constant and low direct current delivered via electrodes on the scalp.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral stroke patients
- Chronic patients over 6 months after onset
- Patients with motor evoked potential of the first dorsal interosseous muscle
- Patients with the movement of fingers
You may not qualify if:
- History of psychiatric disease
- Significant other neurological diseases except for stroke
- Difficult to perform this experiment
- Patients who are deemed difficult to participate in this research by the investigator
- Patients with metal implants and medical devices
- History of epilepsy
- Pregnancy
- Skin defect at the site of electrode attachment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Samsung Medical Centerlead
- Pusan National University Yangsan Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2021
First Posted
January 7, 2021
Study Start
January 29, 2021
Primary Completion
December 23, 2022
Study Completion
December 23, 2022
Last Updated
February 3, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-02