NCT06268275

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare hemodynamic response (MAP, SBP, DBP and HR) between scalp block and intravenous esmolol while skull pins application in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2022

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 19, 2022

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2024

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 13, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 13, 2024

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 20, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Status Verified

February 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 13, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • MAP

    Mean arterial pressure

    Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins

  • SBP

    Systolic blood pressure

    Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins

  • DBP

    Diastolic blood pressure

    Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins

  • HR

    Heart rate

    Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • BIS

    Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins

  • Cumulative postoperative opioids consumption

    6 hours and 24 hours postoperatively

  • Postoperative adverse events

    Within first 24 hours postoperatively

Study Arms (2)

Group S

EXPERIMENTAL

Receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1% lidocaine (1:1) with adrenaline 1:200,000 infiltration for 10 minutes before skull pins application.

Procedure: Scalp block

Group E

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Receive intravenous esmolol 1 mg/kg bolus over 1 minute before skull pins application.

Drug: Esmolol

Interventions

Scalp blockPROCEDURE

Receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1% lidocaine (1:1) with adrenaline 1:200,000 infiltration for 10 minutes before skull pins application.

Group S

Receive Intravenous esmolol 1 mg/kg bolus over 1 minute before skull pins application

Group E

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-65 years old
  • BMI 18-30 kg/m2
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III
  • Elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia
  • Required application of skull pins

You may not qualify if:

  • Poor controlled hypertensive condition (Baseline BP ≥ 160/110 mmHg)
  • Thrombocytopenia / Coagulopathy
  • Preoperative atrioventricular block (More than 2nd degree AV block)
  • Emergency surgery
  • Posterior fossa / Intracranial aneurysm surgery
  • Pregnancy
  • Chronic use of pain control
  • Contraindication to beta-blockers
  • Allergy to the drugs used in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Khon Kaen University

Khon Kaen, Naimuang, Muang, 40002, Thailand

Location

Related Publications (22)

  • Fukuda S, Warner DS. Cerebral protection. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jul;99(1):10-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem140.

    PMID: 17573393BACKGROUND
  • Li J, Gelb AW, Flexman AM, Ji F, Meng L. Definition, evaluation, and management of brain relaxation during craniotomy. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):759-69. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew096. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

    PMID: 27121854BACKGROUND
  • Colley PS. Blunting the hemodynamic response to skull-pin placement. Anesth Analg. 1997 Apr;84(4):942. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199704000-00056. No abstract available.

    PMID: 9085997BACKGROUND
  • Singh G, Arimanikam G, Lionel KR, Smita V, Yadav B, Arulvelan A, et al. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Infusion versus Scalp Block with 0.5% Ropivacaine to Attenuate Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pin Insertion in Craniotomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Neuroanaesth Crit Care. 2021 Sep;08(03):180-6.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bharne S, Bidkar PU, Badhe AS, Parida S, Ramesh AS. Comparison of intravenous labetalol and bupivacaine scalp block on the hemodynamic and entropy changes following skull pin application: A randomized, open label clinical trial. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan-Mar;11(1):60-5. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.165801.

    PMID: 26889282BACKGROUND
  • Yang SH, Liu R. Cerebral Autoregulation. In: Primer on Cerebrovascular Diseases [Internet]. Elsevier; 2017 [cited 2022 Jun 10]. p. 57-60.

    BACKGROUND
  • Jellish WS, Theard MA, Cheng MA, Leonetti JP, Crowder CM, Tempelhoff R. The effects of clonidine premedication and scalp infiltration of lidocaine on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and skull pin head-holder insertion during skull base procedures. Skull Base. 2001 Aug;11(3):169-76. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16605.

    PMID: 17167618BACKGROUND
  • Misra S, Koshy T, Unnikrishnan KP, Suneel PR, Chatterjee N. Gabapentin premedication decreases the hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion in patients undergoing craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011 Apr;23(2):110-7. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181da3c3b.

    PMID: 20479668BACKGROUND
  • Koo CH, Jeon S, Kim J, Ryu JH. The effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic response in patients undergoing skull-pin head-holder application during neurosurgery - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;195:105939. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105939. Epub 2020 May 20.

    PMID: 32480196BACKGROUND
  • Doblar DD, Lim YC, Baykan N, Frenette L. A comparison of alfentanil, esmolol, lidocaine, and thiopental sodium on the hemodynamic response to insertion of headrest skull pins. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Feb;8(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00169-7.

    PMID: 8695076BACKGROUND
  • Agarwal A, Sinha PK, Pandey CM, Gaur A, Pandey CK, Kaushik S. Effect of a subanesthetic dose of intravenous ketamine and/or local anesthetic infiltration on hemodynamic responses to skull-pin placement: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2001 Jul;13(3):189-94. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200107000-00002.

    PMID: 11426091BACKGROUND
  • Geze S, Yilmaz AA, Tuzuner F. The effect of scalp block and local infiltration on the haemodynamic and stress response to skull-pin placement for craniotomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Apr;26(4):298-303. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831aedb2.

    PMID: 19262392BACKGROUND
  • Altaf I, Banday J, Naaz S, Ozair E, Punetha P, Challam K. A randomized control trial on comparative effect of scalp nerve block using levobupivacaine versus fentanyl on the attenuation of pain and hemodynamic response to pin fixation. Bali J Anesthesiol. 2021;5(2):66.

    BACKGROUND
  • Yang X, Ma J, Li K, Chen L, Dong R, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Peng M. A comparison of effects of scalp nerve block and local anesthetic infiltration on inflammatory response, hemodynamic response, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral aneurysms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun 1;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0760-4.

    PMID: 31153358BACKGROUND
  • Hagan KB, Bhavsar S, Raza SM, Arnold B, Arunkumar R, Dang A, Gottumukkala V, Popat K, Pratt G, Rahlfs T, Cata JP. Enhanced recovery after surgery for oncological craniotomies. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb;24:10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

    PMID: 26474504BACKGROUND
  • Watts R, Thiruvenkatarajan V, Calvert M, Newcombe G, van Wijk RM. The effect of perioperative esmolol on early postoperative pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):28-39. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.202182.

    PMID: 28413270BACKGROUND
  • Gelineau AM, King MR, Ladha KS, Burns SM, Houle T, Anderson TA. Intraoperative Esmolol as an Adjunct for Perioperative Opioid and Postoperative Pain Reduction: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1035-1049. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002469.

    PMID: 29028742BACKGROUND
  • Morais VBD, Sakata RK, Huang APS, Ferraro LHDC. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the analgesic effect of intraoperative esmolol for laparoscopic gastroplasty. Acta Cir Bras. 2020 Jun 5;35(4):e202000408. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020200040000008. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 32555939BACKGROUND
  • Kang JK, Yoo SH, Chung JH, Kim NS, Jung HS, Seo YH, Chun HR, Gong HY, Son HD, Kim AJ. Dosing study of esmolol for reducing hemodynamic changes during lightwand intubation. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Oct 30;15(4):417-423. doi: 10.17085/apm.19067.

    PMID: 33329844BACKGROUND
  • Sola C, Dadure C, Choquet O, Capdevila X. Nerve Blocks of The Face. NYSORA [Internet]. 2018 Sep 17 [cited 2022 Jun 10]; Available from: https://www.nysora.com/techniques/head-and-neck-blocks/nerve-blocks-face/

    BACKGROUND
  • Hockey B, Leslie K, Williams D. Dexamethasone for intracranial neurosurgery and anaesthesia. J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Nov;16(11):1389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Aug 7.

    PMID: 19665383BACKGROUND
  • Uribe AA, Stoicea N, Echeverria-Villalobos M, Todeschini AB, Esparza Gutierrez A, Folea AR, Bergese SD. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Craniotomy: An Evidence-based Review of General Considerations, Risk Factors, and Management. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 1;33(3):212-220. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000667.

    PMID: 31834247BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

esmolol

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: RCT
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Akkhara Olanvoravuth

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2024

First Posted

February 20, 2024

Study Start

September 19, 2022

Primary Completion

February 1, 2024

Study Completion

February 13, 2024

Last Updated

February 20, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All collected individual participant data (IPD)

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
6 months after publication
Access Criteria
Researchers who required more information for further study

Locations