Comparison of Effects of Scalp Block and Intravenous Esmolol on Hemodynamic Response Following the Skull Pins Application for Elective Supratentorial Craniotomy
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare hemodynamic response (MAP, SBP, DBP and HR) between scalp block and intravenous esmolol while skull pins application in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 19, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 13, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 13, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 20, 2024
CompletedFebruary 20, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.4 years
February 13, 2024
February 13, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
MAP
Mean arterial pressure
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
SBP
Systolic blood pressure
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
DBP
Diastolic blood pressure
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
HR
Heart rate
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
Secondary Outcomes (3)
BIS
Baseline, 1 minute before skull pins, then 30 sec, 60 sec, 90 sec, 120 sec, 180 sec and 300 sec after skull pins
Cumulative postoperative opioids consumption
6 hours and 24 hours postoperatively
Postoperative adverse events
Within first 24 hours postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Group S
EXPERIMENTALReceive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1% lidocaine (1:1) with adrenaline 1:200,000 infiltration for 10 minutes before skull pins application.
Group E
ACTIVE COMPARATORReceive intravenous esmolol 1 mg/kg bolus over 1 minute before skull pins application.
Interventions
Receive 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine with 1% lidocaine (1:1) with adrenaline 1:200,000 infiltration for 10 minutes before skull pins application.
Receive Intravenous esmolol 1 mg/kg bolus over 1 minute before skull pins application
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18-65 years old
- BMI 18-30 kg/m2
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III
- Elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia
- Required application of skull pins
You may not qualify if:
- Poor controlled hypertensive condition (Baseline BP ≥ 160/110 mmHg)
- Thrombocytopenia / Coagulopathy
- Preoperative atrioventricular block (More than 2nd degree AV block)
- Emergency surgery
- Posterior fossa / Intracranial aneurysm surgery
- Pregnancy
- Chronic use of pain control
- Contraindication to beta-blockers
- Allergy to the drugs used in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Khon Kaen University
Khon Kaen, Naimuang, Muang, 40002, Thailand
Related Publications (22)
Fukuda S, Warner DS. Cerebral protection. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jul;99(1):10-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem140.
PMID: 17573393BACKGROUNDLi J, Gelb AW, Flexman AM, Ji F, Meng L. Definition, evaluation, and management of brain relaxation during craniotomy. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):759-69. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew096. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
PMID: 27121854BACKGROUNDColley PS. Blunting the hemodynamic response to skull-pin placement. Anesth Analg. 1997 Apr;84(4):942. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199704000-00056. No abstract available.
PMID: 9085997BACKGROUNDSingh G, Arimanikam G, Lionel KR, Smita V, Yadav B, Arulvelan A, et al. Comparison of Dexmedetomidine Infusion versus Scalp Block with 0.5% Ropivacaine to Attenuate Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pin Insertion in Craniotomy: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. J Neuroanaesth Crit Care. 2021 Sep;08(03):180-6.
BACKGROUNDBharne S, Bidkar PU, Badhe AS, Parida S, Ramesh AS. Comparison of intravenous labetalol and bupivacaine scalp block on the hemodynamic and entropy changes following skull pin application: A randomized, open label clinical trial. Asian J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan-Mar;11(1):60-5. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.165801.
PMID: 26889282BACKGROUNDYang SH, Liu R. Cerebral Autoregulation. In: Primer on Cerebrovascular Diseases [Internet]. Elsevier; 2017 [cited 2022 Jun 10]. p. 57-60.
BACKGROUNDJellish WS, Theard MA, Cheng MA, Leonetti JP, Crowder CM, Tempelhoff R. The effects of clonidine premedication and scalp infiltration of lidocaine on hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and skull pin head-holder insertion during skull base procedures. Skull Base. 2001 Aug;11(3):169-76. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-16605.
PMID: 17167618BACKGROUNDMisra S, Koshy T, Unnikrishnan KP, Suneel PR, Chatterjee N. Gabapentin premedication decreases the hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion in patients undergoing craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011 Apr;23(2):110-7. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181da3c3b.
PMID: 20479668BACKGROUNDKoo CH, Jeon S, Kim J, Ryu JH. The effects of intravenous dexmedetomidine on hemodynamic response in patients undergoing skull-pin head-holder application during neurosurgery - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Aug;195:105939. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.105939. Epub 2020 May 20.
PMID: 32480196BACKGROUNDDoblar DD, Lim YC, Baykan N, Frenette L. A comparison of alfentanil, esmolol, lidocaine, and thiopental sodium on the hemodynamic response to insertion of headrest skull pins. J Clin Anesth. 1996 Feb;8(1):31-5. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(95)00169-7.
PMID: 8695076BACKGROUNDAgarwal A, Sinha PK, Pandey CM, Gaur A, Pandey CK, Kaushik S. Effect of a subanesthetic dose of intravenous ketamine and/or local anesthetic infiltration on hemodynamic responses to skull-pin placement: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2001 Jul;13(3):189-94. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200107000-00002.
PMID: 11426091BACKGROUNDGeze S, Yilmaz AA, Tuzuner F. The effect of scalp block and local infiltration on the haemodynamic and stress response to skull-pin placement for craniotomy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Apr;26(4):298-303. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831aedb2.
PMID: 19262392BACKGROUNDAltaf I, Banday J, Naaz S, Ozair E, Punetha P, Challam K. A randomized control trial on comparative effect of scalp nerve block using levobupivacaine versus fentanyl on the attenuation of pain and hemodynamic response to pin fixation. Bali J Anesthesiol. 2021;5(2):66.
BACKGROUNDYang X, Ma J, Li K, Chen L, Dong R, Lu Y, Zhang Z, Peng M. A comparison of effects of scalp nerve block and local anesthetic infiltration on inflammatory response, hemodynamic response, and postoperative pain in patients undergoing craniotomy for cerebral aneurysms: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jun 1;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0760-4.
PMID: 31153358BACKGROUNDHagan KB, Bhavsar S, Raza SM, Arnold B, Arunkumar R, Dang A, Gottumukkala V, Popat K, Pratt G, Rahlfs T, Cata JP. Enhanced recovery after surgery for oncological craniotomies. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Feb;24:10-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
PMID: 26474504BACKGROUNDWatts R, Thiruvenkatarajan V, Calvert M, Newcombe G, van Wijk RM. The effect of perioperative esmolol on early postoperative pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Jan-Mar;33(1):28-39. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.202182.
PMID: 28413270BACKGROUNDGelineau AM, King MR, Ladha KS, Burns SM, Houle T, Anderson TA. Intraoperative Esmolol as an Adjunct for Perioperative Opioid and Postoperative Pain Reduction: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1035-1049. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002469.
PMID: 29028742BACKGROUNDMorais VBD, Sakata RK, Huang APS, Ferraro LHDC. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the analgesic effect of intraoperative esmolol for laparoscopic gastroplasty. Acta Cir Bras. 2020 Jun 5;35(4):e202000408. doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020200040000008. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32555939BACKGROUNDKang JK, Yoo SH, Chung JH, Kim NS, Jung HS, Seo YH, Chun HR, Gong HY, Son HD, Kim AJ. Dosing study of esmolol for reducing hemodynamic changes during lightwand intubation. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2020 Oct 30;15(4):417-423. doi: 10.17085/apm.19067.
PMID: 33329844BACKGROUNDSola C, Dadure C, Choquet O, Capdevila X. Nerve Blocks of The Face. NYSORA [Internet]. 2018 Sep 17 [cited 2022 Jun 10]; Available from: https://www.nysora.com/techniques/head-and-neck-blocks/nerve-blocks-face/
BACKGROUNDHockey B, Leslie K, Williams D. Dexamethasone for intracranial neurosurgery and anaesthesia. J Clin Neurosci. 2009 Nov;16(11):1389-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
PMID: 19665383BACKGROUNDUribe AA, Stoicea N, Echeverria-Villalobos M, Todeschini AB, Esparza Gutierrez A, Folea AR, Bergese SD. Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting After Craniotomy: An Evidence-based Review of General Considerations, Risk Factors, and Management. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2021 Jul 1;33(3):212-220. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000667.
PMID: 31834247BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Akkhara Olanvoravuth
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 13, 2024
First Posted
February 20, 2024
Study Start
September 19, 2022
Primary Completion
February 1, 2024
Study Completion
February 13, 2024
Last Updated
February 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- 6 months after publication
- Access Criteria
- Researchers who required more information for further study
All collected individual participant data (IPD)