Study Stopped
Lack of inclusion
Intra-Osseous Access in Difficult Vascular Access Cases
IODA
1 other identifier
interventional
3
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Thousands of peripheral venous accesses are inserted every day all over the world. Some of them, such as those inserted in emergency and / or in critical patients, are absolutely vital. In the particular context of prehospital care, the rate of failure of the first attempt to insert a peripheral venous access has been evaluated at 25%. Success rates of successive attempts were about 75%. Nevertheless, the final success rate is close to 100%. Failure or delay in obtaining venous access can be life-threatening. Thus, alternatives to peripheral venous access have been proposed including intraosseous route recently made easier by the development of an automated puncture device (EZ-IO®), but still rarely used, especially on conscious patient. Currently, the place of intraosseous venous access in critical patients is not determined.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 6, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 24, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 10, 2024
CompletedMarch 13, 2025
March 1, 2025
1.1 years
April 6, 2022
March 11, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
To demonstrate that the early recourse to the intraosseous route, from the first failure, makes it possible to obtain more quickly the correction of the failure of critical patient managed in prehospital setting.
• In patients with cardiac arrest: Time required for a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Only the first ROSC will be considered.
• In patients with cardiac arrest: Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), an average of 1 hour
To demonstrate that the early recourse to the intraosseous route, from the first failure, makes it possible to obtain more quickly the correction of the failure of critical patient managed in prehospital setting.
• In patients with hemodynamic failure: delay to reach a systolic blood pressure correction, i.e. systolic blood pressure \> 90 mm Hg. Systolic blood pressure will be assessed every 5 minutes after the placement of the intravenous line. Two consecutive measures are required to reach the end-point. In the cases where continuous invasive blood pressure monitoring will be available, systolic blood pressure \> 90 mm Hg \> 1 minute will be required.
• In patients with hemodynamic failure: Reach a systolic blood pressure correction, an average of 1 hour
To demonstrate that the early recourse to the intraosseous route, from the first failure, makes it possible to obtain more quickly the correction of the failure of critical patient managed in prehospital setting.
• In patients requiring endo-tracheal intubation: time required to achieve intubation.
• In patients requiring endo-tracheal intubation: Achieve intubation, an average of 1 hour
Secondary Outcomes (23)
To characterize the conditions for implementation of the procedure, depending on the strategy used.
1 minute
To characterize the conditions for implementation of the procedure, depending on the strategy used.
In patients with cardiac arrest: Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), an average of 1 hour
To characterize the conditions for implementation of the procedure, depending on the strategy used.
In patients with hemodynamic failure: Reach a systolic blood pressure correction, an average of 1 hour
To characterize the conditions for implementation of the procedure, depending on the strategy used.
In patients requiring endo-tracheal intubation: Achieve intubation, an average of 1 hour
To characterize the conditions for implementation of the procedure, depending on the strategy used.
In patients with cardiac arrest: Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). In patients with hemodynamic failure: Reach a systolic blood pressure correction. In patients requiring endo-tracheal intubation: Achieve intubation
- +18 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
intraosseous venous access
EXPERIMENTALintraosseous venous access
peripheral venous access
ACTIVE COMPARATORLimiting use of intraosseous access (intraosseous access possible after 3 attempts of peripheral venous access)
Interventions
Immediate placement of humeral intra-osseous venous access (after a first failed attempt of peripheral venous access)
Looking for peripheral venous access, changing the site of puncture, the caliber of the catheter and/or the operator and/or assistance tools (ultrasound, infra-red guidance...) and/or using another route (oral, rectal, subcutaneous, intramuscular route and central venous access)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient, in prehospital setting, without venous access and after failure of the first attempt to place a peripheral venous access by a senior operator (doctor or nurse) AND
- Patient with hemodynamic failure defined as:
- systolic blood pressure (SBP) \< 90 mm Hg (2 measures) or
- cardiac arrest or
- Any situation requiring intubation
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- Venous access already available
- Known contra-indications to intraosseous access (i.e. bilateral lesions):
- Bone fracture
- Skin infection
- Osteoporosis
- Osteomyelitis
- Local burns
- Recent failed intraosseous attempt
- Prior surgery
- Compartment syndrome
- Every other local specific situations
- Pregnancy woman
- Patient with no national health or universal plan affiliation coverage
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hôpital Avicenne
Bobigny, France, 93000, France
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
LAPOSTOLLE Frédéric, PhD MD
APHP
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 6, 2022
First Posted
February 1, 2023
Study Start
March 2, 2023
Primary Completion
April 24, 2024
Study Completion
September 10, 2024
Last Updated
March 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share