The Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Dental X-rays Analysis
Comparison of the Dental X-ray Analysis Performed by an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm and the Analysis Performed by Dentists
1 other identifier
observational
1,025
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This cross-sectional study aims to perform a population-based assessment of the incidence of decay, dental fillings, root canal fillings, endodontic lesions, implants, implant and dental abutment crowns, pontic crowns, and missing teeth, taking into account the location.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 25, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 14, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2024
CompletedApril 1, 2025
March 1, 2025
4 months
January 25, 2024
March 27, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Sensitivity
Sensitivity (also known as recall or true positive rate) is the proportion of actual positive cases that are correctly predicted as positive. It evaluates the performance of an AI algorithm. Formally it can be calculated with the following equation: Sensitivity = TP / (TP+FN) True positive (TP) - a test result that correctly indicates the presence of a condition or characteristic False Negative (FN) - a test result which wrongly indicates that a particular condition or characteristic is absent
Up to 6 weeks
Specificity
Specificity (also known as true negative rate) - is the proportion of actual negative cases that are correctly predicted as negative. It evaluates the performance of an AI algorithm. Formally it can be calculated by the equation below: Specificity = TN / (TN + FP) True negative (TN) - a test result that correctly indicates the absence of a condition or characteristic False positive (FP) - a test result which wrongly indicates that a particular condition or characteristic is present
Up to 6 weeks
Precision of the AI algorithm
Precision is an evaluation metric used to assess the performance of machine learning algorithm for AI. It measures how accurate the algorithm is. We will use the number of true positives (TP) and false positives (FP) to calculate precision using the following formula: Precision = TP / (TP + FP) True positive (TP) - a test result that correctly indicates the presence of a condition or characteristic False positive (FP) - a test result that wrongly indicates that a particular condition or characteristic is present
Up to 6 weeks
Study Arms (1)
One group of patients (double gate)
Study design: * Direction of data collection: retrospective * Number of gates (sets of eligibility criteria): double gate (AI, human) * Participant sampling method: Consecutive * Method of allocating participants to index tests: Each participant received all index tests * Number of reference standards: Single test standard * Limited verification: Full verification (not limited)
Interventions
Dental X-rays taken in patients with indications confirmed by a written referral.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients included in the study were admitted to the radiology department in Kielce, a city in southern Poland with around 200.000 inhabitants.
You may qualify if:
- Indications for dental X-ray confirmed by a written referral from the dentist or physician (both screening tests and tests performed for treatment purposes were allowed)
- Permanent dentition (after exfoliation is completed)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with mixed dentition (exfoliation has not finished)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery
Kielce, 25-375, Poland
Related Publications (1)
Turosz N, Checinska K, Checinski M, Lubecka K, Blizniak F, Sikora M. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Assessment of Pediatric Dental Panoramic Radiographs (DPRs): A Clinical Study. Pediatr Rep. 2024 Sep 11;16(3):794-805. doi: 10.3390/pediatric16030067.
PMID: 39311330DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Maciej Sikora
Hospital of the Ministry of Interior, Wojska Polskiego 51, 25-375 Kielce, Poland
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 25, 2024
First Posted
February 14, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion
November 1, 2024
Last Updated
April 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share