NCT03329170

Brief Summary

Background: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is one of the most common congenital anomalies in children. As the risk for endocarditis following bacteraemia is more common during daily oral hygiene routines, such as tooth brushing, than during dental treatment, the maintenance of optimal oral health in children with CHD may be considered of outmost importance. Children with CHD have a higher caries prevalence compared to healthy controls. Aim: The primary aim of the study is to explore if an educational intervention including information, counselling and support provided at early stage to families affected by major CHD, or CHD combined with a syndrome, can increase the awareness of the importance of maintaining of good oral health, and avoid the development of poor oral health including dental caries, leading to less dental anxiety and a higher oral heath related quality of life. The secondary aim is to elucidate factors associated with the development of poor oral health and/or orofacial dysfunction as well as family attitudes and needs of support. Hypothesis: Early information, counselling and support will lead to a) increased awareness of the importance to maintaining good oral health, b) prevent the development of poor oral health and dental caries, c) lead to less dental fear, and d) lead to higher oral heath related quality of life. Study design: Randomized educational intervention trial. Study population: Children born in Finland and under 12 months of age in 1.7.2017-31.12.2021 with, a) major CHD and potentially included in the criteria of endocarditis prophylaxis, or b) with a major CHD combined with a chromosomal syndrome, will be offered to participate in the study. Patients will be recruited until 200 patients are obtained at the Helsinki University Children's Hospital. A control group consisting of approximately 100 healthy children will also be recruited at birth. Main outcomes: Dental caries, dental anxiety, oral health related quality of life, and awareness of importance to maintain and behaviour to maintain good oral health. Significance: Better information to patients leads to better possibility to achieve good oral health. Better oral health leads to 1) less dental procedures and thereby less dental anxiety, 2) less dental procedures under general anaesthesia, which may potentially be a risk procedure for the child with CHD, and 3) better oral health related quality of life.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
56mo left

Started Jul 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress66%
Jul 2017Dec 2030

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 10, 2017

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 1, 2017

Completed
6.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2024

Completed
6.3 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2030

Expected
Last Updated

October 2, 2024

Status Verified

September 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7.2 years

First QC Date

October 10, 2017

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Oral healthDental cariesHeart DefectsCongenital

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Caries

    During a clinical dental examination, caries will be registered clinically according to the ICDAS II (Pitts et al 2013, Shoaib et al 2009). The caries lesions on a tooth surface are graded as "initial" (ICDAS 1-2), "moderate" (ICDAS 3-4) and "extensive" (ICDAS 5-6). The indexes dmfs (decayed, missing or filled surfaces) and dmft (decayed, missing or filled surfaces) will be calculated separately for ICDAS 1-2, ICDAS 3-6 and ICDAS 1-6. The range for dmfs is 0-88 and dmft is 0-20, with 0 indicating no caries, and an increasing number indicating more carious lesions.

    36 months of age

  • Dental plaque

    During a clinical dental examination, visible plaque will be registered on the labial surfaces of the maxillary incisors (y/n) as a risk indicator for developing caries (Alaluusua and Malmivirta 1994).

    36 months of age

  • Awareness of the importance to maintain good oral heath

    Awareness of the importance to maintain good oral health will be measured with a questionnaire designed to assess adherence to the recommendations in the written information regarding oral health care provided at baseline in the intervention group. The questionnaire includes three domains: tooth brushing, sugar intake, and dental contact. Tooth brushing includes 6 questions (morning, night, parent brushing, problems with brushing, continue brushing though problems, fluoride tooth paste), sugar intake includes 5 questions (frequency of eating, sugary drink, eating during night, sugary food, medicine taken with sugar), and the dental contact includes one question (dental visit). Every answer not in accordance to the recommendations given, is scored with 1 point, giving a range in tooth brushing 0-6, sugar intake 0-5, and dental contact 0-1, with an increasing value indicating less awareness of the importance to maintain good oral health.

    Intervention group at 24 and 36 months of age; CHD control group at 24 and 36 months of age; healthy control group at 24 and 36 months of age.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Developmental defects of the enamel

    36 months of age

  • Orofacial dysfunction

    36 months of age

  • Dental fear

    36 months of age

  • Oral health related quality of life (OHRQoL)

    36 months of age

Study Arms (3)

CHD intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

educational intervention using motivational interviewing

Behavioral: educational intervention using motivational interviewing

CHD control

NO INTERVENTION

At 24 and 36 months of age the parents of the child will fill in a questionnaire via internet, designed to assess oral health behaviour. At 36 months of age the child will be offered to participate in a clinical dental examination.

Healthy control

NO INTERVENTION

At 36 months of age the parents of the child will fill in a questionnaire via internet, designed to assess oral health behaviour. At 36 months of age the child will be offered to participate in a clinical dental examination.

Interventions

A dental hygienist will offer the families verbal and written information regarding oral health and its importance in children with CHD at the cardiac ward, when child is \<12 months. At 6, 12 and 18 months of age, oral health behaviour is assessed via internet, the parents of the child will be sent written information regarding oral health, a tooth brush and a 1000ppm Fluoride tooth paste, after which the dental hygienist will call the parents of the child, to provide additional counselling regarding oral health and its importance in children with CHD. The counselling will be done by motivational interviewing. The themes discussed will be the parents' concerns regarding main points in the written information from the cardiac ward: oral home care, eating habits and dental contact.

CHD intervention

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 12 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Age \< 12 months and prostethic cardiac valve or patient likely to undergo valve surgery using foreign material including homograft (potentially included in the criteria of endocarditis prophylaxis)
  • Age \< 12 months and unrepaired cyanotic CHD including palliative shunts and conduits
  • Age \< 12 months and repaired CHD with residual defects at the site or adjacent to the site of the prosthetic patch or device which inhibits endothelialization
  • Age \< 12 months and cardiac transplantation recipient or listed for transplantation (potentially included in the criteria of endocarditis prophylaxis)
  • Age \< 12 months and cardiomyopathy (potential cardiac transplantation recipient)
  • Age \< 12 months and chromosomal abnormality or syndrome and any invasive intevention (surgery or cath) for CHD or likely to require invasive intervention for CHD

You may not qualify if:

  • Neither parent amenable to comprehend intervention instructions provided in Finnish
  • Child in out-of-home care (eg foster care)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Pediatrics, Children´s Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital.

Helsinki, Finland

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DemineralizationTooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • My Blomqvist, PhD

    Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Diseases, Helsinki University Central Hospital.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
DDS, Specialist in Paediatric Dentistry, PhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 10, 2017

First Posted

November 1, 2017

Study Start

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion

August 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Last Updated

October 2, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations