Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill Composite Using With Adhesives With or Without Chlorhexidine
1 other identifier
interventional
40
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study aims to evaluate the clinical success of chlorhexidine-containing dentin bonding agent in primary molars with a 12-month follow-up. The research question is: Is there a difference between the clinical evaluation results of deciduous teeth restored with dentin bonding agents containing and not containing chlorhexidine? A total of 40 patients aged 5-9 years with at least two dentin caries in primary molars were included in the study. The study involved a split-mouth design in which the standard bond and chlorhexidine-containing bond as the adhesive agents. Bulk Fill composite was used as the restorative material for the restoration of primary molars with class II cavity. The evaluation of clinical success was performed by a calibrated observer according to the FDI criteria at months 3, 6, 9, and 12 after restoration.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2019
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 5, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 13, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 15, 2024
CompletedApril 23, 2025
February 1, 2024
3.9 years
February 5, 2024
April 17, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical evaluation
Following the completion of the restorations, a proficient observer, unaware of the utilized material, will assess the respective tooth based on the World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria (reference). This evaluation will be conducted using a mirror and probe under illumination, with teeth being dried using air/water spray. The assigned scores will categorize the restorations as successful (Score 1), exhibiting minor defects (Score 2), showing acceptable defects (Score 3), needing repair (Score 4), or necessitating replacement (Score 5).
The treatments will be assessed using the same method over a 12-month period with 3-month intervals.
Study Arms (2)
Restorative group
EXPERIMENTALClass II restorations using chlorhexidine-containing bonding agent in Primary molars in children aged between 5-9 years.
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORClass II restorations using standard bonding agent in Primary molars in children aged between 5-9 years.
Interventions
The study involved a split-mouth design in which Ultradent PQ1 Bond (standard bond) and Ultradent Peak Universal Bond (chlorhexidine-containing bond) were used as the bonding agents, and Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill composite was used as the restorative material for the restoration of primary molars with class II cavity.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (1) age between 5-9 years; (2) no systemic health problems (3) presence of at least one interproximal carious lesion not exceeding half of the dentin structure (D1 level) in the right and left sides of the mouth; (4) cooperation without issues (scoring 3 or 4 on the Frankl scale); and (5) patient and parent's willingness to attend follow-up appointments throughout the study.
You may not qualify if:
- (1) the presence of pulp vitality with no clinical and/or radiological signs requiring endodontic treatment, (2) no previous treatment on the selected teeth, (3) Radiographically, the caries should not extend to one-third of the pulp, indicating only the need for a Class II restoration, (4) the presence of adjacent teeth mesial and distal to the selected tooth and an opposing tooth in the oral cavity, (5) the absence of physiological or pathological root resorption.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Uşak Universitylead
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 5, 2024
First Posted
February 13, 2024
Study Start
January 15, 2016
Primary Completion
December 15, 2019
Study Completion
April 15, 2024
Last Updated
April 23, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
there are no plans to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.