NCT06092567

Brief Summary

Participants will be divided into groups. In group A, Composite restoration done using oblique incremental technique. In group B, Bulk-fill technique was used. VAS scoring to evaluate the primary outcome at one day, one week and two weeks.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 20, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 24, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 24, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 30, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 23, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 23, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

September 30, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 14, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post-operative sensitivity in composite resin restoration

    Evaluation of post-restorative sensitivity in composite restorations using Visual analogue scale score with scoring from 0 to 10. Score 0 (none), 1 to 3 (mild), 4 to 6 (moderate), and 7 to 10 (severe).

    Two weeks

Study Arms (2)

Group A (Oblique Incremental Placement Techniique)

EXPERIMENTAL

In this interventional group, a Nanohybrid composite resin Nexcomp (Meta Biomed, Korea) was placed using an oblique incremental technique with increments not exceeding 2 mm in thickness.

Procedure: Group A ( Oblique Incremental Placement Technique)

Group B (Bulk-fill Placement Technique)

EXPERIMENTAL

In this group, a composite Beautifil-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU dental) was utilized for restorative purposes using a bulk-fill technique with a thickness of 4 mm.

Procedure: Group B (Bulk-fill Placement technique)

Interventions

In this interventional group, a Nanohybrid composite resin Nexcomp (Meta Biomed, Korea) was placed using an oblique incremental technique with increments not exceeding 2 mm in thickness.

Group A (Oblique Incremental Placement Techniique)

In this group, a composite Beautifil-Bulk Restorative (SHOFU dental) was utilized for restorative purposes using a bulk-fill technique with a thickness of 4 mm

Group B (Bulk-fill Placement Technique)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Minimum 18 years of age with good general health
  • Vital and Periodontally stable teeth
  • Class-II primary carious lesions with a cavity depth of 3 to 5 mm
  • Established contact with adjacent and opposing natural or prosthetic teeth
  • Prior defective restorations in need of replacement (secondary caries, marginal fractures, and marginal staining)

You may not qualify if:

  • Teeth with a history of spontaneous pain
  • Compromised oral health status
  • Patients with parafunctional habits or temporomandibular disorders
  • Previously endodontically treated teeth or evidence of associated periapical/periodontal pathosis
  • Participants with a drug history of using anti-inflammatory, analgesics, or psychotropic medications within the last 2 weeks

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

School of Dentistry, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Medical University

Islamabad, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Afifi SMH, Haridy MF, Farid MR. Evaluation of Post-Operative Sensitivity of Bulk Fill Resin Composite versus Nano Resin Composite: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Jul 26;7(14):2335-2342. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.656. eCollection 2019 Jul 30.

    PMID: 31592052BACKGROUND
  • Tardem C, Albuquerque EG, Lopes LS, Marins SS, Calazans FS, Poubel LA, Barcelos R, Barceleiro MO. Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Sep 16;33(0):e089. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0089.

    PMID: 31531552BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dentin Sensitivity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Nehal Amir, BDS

    Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
This is a double-blinded study in which the participant and the outcome assessor masked.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: In this study, participants allocated in two groups by Consecutive non-random sampling technique
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2023

First Posted

October 23, 2023

Study Start

December 20, 2022

Primary Completion

July 24, 2023

Study Completion

July 24, 2023

Last Updated

October 23, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations