Comparison of Neuromuscular Recovery at the Hand and Foot
Comparison of the TOFscan Simultaneous Measures at the Thumb and the First Toe During Recovery of Neuromuscular Function Following Rocuronium Administration
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Gold standard for neuromuscular blockade evaluation is accelerometry in three dimensions at the thumb. There are many times that measurement at the hand can be falsely under-estimated intraoperatively secondary to constriction of the upper extremities. We believe that installing the same accelerometer at the first toe will give us similar readings for both neuromuscular blockade and recovery from rocuronium administration. This study focuses on agreement values between two accelerometers installed on the hand and at on the foot.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 16, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2024
CompletedMarch 8, 2024
March 1, 2024
1 month
January 16, 2024
March 6, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Time of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) recovery
Time required for train-of-four (TOF) \> 0.9 for the two TOFscans
60 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Neuromuscular blockade onset
3 minutes
Reversal
60 minutes
Extubation
1 minute
Study Arms (1)
Observation and control
Two accelerometers will be applied on each patient; observation (foot) and control (hand, also the gold standard). Agreement values will be compared between these two monitors.
Interventions
TOFscan will be applied on the foot and recovery from neuromuscular blockade will be observed over time. These will be compared with the control (TOFscan at the hand) on the same patient (gold standard monitor).
Eligibility Criteria
Any patient scheduled for more than 2 hours extra cavitary surgery where muscle relaxation spontaneous reversal will not interfere with the completion of the planned surgical procedure.
You may qualify if:
- ASA 1-3 patients
- Elective surgery
- Undergoing general anesthesia with rocuronium induced NMB
- BMI \< 36 kg.m-2
- Age \> 18 years old
- French or English speaking patient
You may not qualify if:
- Renal or hepatic dysfunction
- Obstructive sleep apnea requiring continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine
- Neuromuscular disease
- Peripheral arterial disease (suspected, known or investigated)
- Calcium channel anomalies
- Hypothermia (\< 35C)
- Hyper/hypomagnasemia
- Allergy to any drug used in the study protocol
- Patient refusal
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital - CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montréal
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4, Canada
Related Publications (14)
Naguib M, Brull SJ, Johnson KB. Conceptual and technical insights into the basis of neuromuscular monitoring. Anaesthesia. 2017 Jan;72 Suppl 1:16-37. doi: 10.1111/anae.13738.
PMID: 28044330RESULTUnterbuchner C, Ehehalt K, Graf B. [Algorithm-based preventive strategies for avoidance of residual neuromuscular blocks]. Anaesthesist. 2019 Nov;68(11):744-754. doi: 10.1007/s00101-019-00677-6. German.
PMID: 31650189RESULTD'Honneur G, Guignard B, Slavov V, Ruggier R, Duvaldestin P. Comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effect of atracurium and vecuronium on the adductor pollicis and the geniohyoid muscle in humans. Anesthesiology. 1995 Mar;82(3):649-54. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199503000-00006.
PMID: 7879933RESULTFortier LP, McKeen D, Turner K, de Medicis E, Warriner B, Jones PM, Chaput A, Pouliot JF, Galarneau A. The RECITE Study: A Canadian Prospective, Multicenter Study of the Incidence and Severity of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade. Anesth Analg. 2015 Aug;121(2):366-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000757.
PMID: 25902322RESULTMurphy GS, Szokol JW, Marymont JH, Greenberg SB, Avram MJ, Vender JS. Residual neuromuscular blockade and critical respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit. Anesth Analg. 2008 Jul;107(1):130-7. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31816d1268.
PMID: 18635478RESULTErrando CL, Garutti I, Mazzinari G, Diaz-Cambronero O, Bebawy JF; Grupo Espanol De Estudio Del Bloqueo Neuromuscular. Residual neuromuscular blockade in the postanesthesia care unit: observational cross-sectional study of a multicenter cohort. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Dec;82(12):1267-1277. Epub 2016 May 27.
PMID: 27232277RESULTSaager L, Maiese EM, Bash LD, Meyer TA, Minkowitz H, Groudine S, Philip BK, Tanaka P, Gan TJ, Rodriguez-Blanco Y, Soto R, Heisel O. Incidence, risk factors, and consequences of residual neuromuscular block in the United States: The prospective, observational, multicenter RECITE-US study. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.042. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
PMID: 30594097RESULTMurphy GS, Szokol JW, Avram MJ, Greenberg SB, Shear TD, Deshur M, Benson J, Newmark RL, Maher CE. Comparison of the TOFscan and the TOF-Watch SX during Recovery of Neuromuscular Function. Anesthesiology. 2018 Nov;129(5):880-888. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002400.
PMID: 30130260RESULTViby-Mogensen J, Jensen NH, Engbaek J, Ording H, Skovgaard LT, Chraemmer-Jorgensen B. Tactile and visual evaluation of the response to train-of-four nerve stimulation. Anesthesiology. 1985 Oct;63(4):440-3. doi: 10.1097/00000542-198510000-00015. No abstract available.
PMID: 4037404RESULTBrull SJ, Silverman DG. Visual and tactile assessment of neuromuscular fade. Anesth Analg. 1993 Aug;77(2):352-5. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199308000-00024.
PMID: 8394051RESULTNaguib M, Brull SJ, Kopman AF, Hunter JM, Fulesdi B, Arkes HR, Elstein A, Todd MM, Johnson KB. Consensus Statement on Perioperative Use of Neuromuscular Monitoring. Anesth Analg. 2018 Jul;127(1):71-80. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002670.
PMID: 29200077RESULTKirov K, Motamed C, Dhonneur G. Differential sensitivity of abdominal muscles and the diaphragm to mivacurium: an electromyographic study. Anesthesiology. 2001 Dec;95(6):1323-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00008.
PMID: 11748387RESULTPlaud B, Debaene B, Donati F. The corrugator supercilii, not the orbicularis oculi, reflects rocuronium neuromuscular blockade at the laryngeal adductor muscles. Anesthesiology. 2001 Jul;95(1):96-101. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200107000-00019.
PMID: 11465590RESULTDhonneur G, Kirov K, Slavov V, Duvaldestin P. Effects of an intubating dose of succinylcholine and rocuronium on the larynx and diaphragm: an electromyographic study in humans. Anesthesiology. 1999 Apr;90(4):951-5. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199904000-00004.
PMID: 10201662RESULT
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
514-252-3426 Fortier, MD
Maisonneuve-Rosemont Hospital - CIUSSS de l'Est de l'Ile de Montréal
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, MSc, Associate Professor, Anesthesiologist, Chief officer perioperative and surgical activities, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine at University of Montréal
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2024
First Posted
February 1, 2024
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion
April 1, 2024
Study Completion
July 1, 2024
Last Updated
March 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share