A Protocol Based-Furosemide Stress Test to Evaluate Renal Recovery During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy
FST-STOP
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Currently, continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the main modality for renal support in critically ill patients with hemodynamic instability. Most studies have investigated the timing of RRT initiation. However, prolonged CRRT demonstrated the association of many unexpected events, such as catheter-related complications, catheter-related blood stream infection, hypotension, hypothermia, tachycardia, and atrial fibrillation. Up to now, there is a lack of evidence regarding the timing of withholding CRRT. The furosemide stress test (FST) is a tool that is easy to use and has more availability. The investigators aimed to apply FST to evaluate renal recovery compared with standard treatment in critically ill patients undergoing CRRT.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_4
Started Jan 2024
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 29, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2028
March 24, 2026
March 1, 2026
5 years
January 1, 2024
March 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
% of patients with Renal recovery
Free of RRT for at least 5 days
5 days
Secondary Outcomes (6)
% of patients with Mortality
28 days
RRT free days
28 days
Day of Hospitalization
28 days
Ventilator-free day
28 days
% of complication
28 days
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Protocol based-furosemide stress test
EXPERIMENTALFurosemide at 1.5 mg/kg intravenously
Standard care
NO INTERVENTIONStandard CRRT care without furosemide use during treatment.
Interventions
After taking furosemide at 1.5 mg/kg intravenously, if the urine output exceeds 200 mL within 2 hours, the patients are going to withhold CRRT. But if there is no response, the titration of furosemide to 2.5 mg/kg and 3.5 mg/kg every 6 hours is scheduled according to the urine output \>200 mL in 2 hours (not exceeding 250 mg).
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult 20 year of age or older
- Acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 3 according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) classification with oliguria (urine \<400 ml/day)
- Initiate CRRT in ICU (medical ICU, surgical ICU, cardiac care unit) for at least 48 hours (time for initiation and modality of CRRT can adjust by clinician)
You may not qualify if:
- Use any inotropic drug (norepinephrine, epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine)
- Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) \>80 mg/dL
- Serum K \<3.5 or \>5 mmol/L
- Arterial potential of Hydrogen (pH) \<7.3
- Serum bicarbonate (HCO3) \<15 mmol/L
- Urine volume \<400 or \>2,100 mL/day
- Urine creatinine clearance (CrCl) at 6 hours \>20 mL/min
- Previous chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 or estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) \<15 mL/min/1.73 m2
- Previous RRT within 14 days
- Kidney transplantation
- Obstructive etiology for AKI
- Toxin/drug that necessitates RRT
- Allergy to furosemide
- Moribund with expected death within 24 hours
- Pregnancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chiang Mai University
Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand
Related Publications (10)
Park S, Lee S, Jo HA, Han K, Kim Y, An JN, Joo KW, Lim CS, Kim YS, Kim H, Kim DK. Epidemiology of continuous renal replacement therapy in Korea: Results from the National Health Insurance Service claims database from 2005 to 2016. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2018 Jun;37(2):119-129. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.2018.37.2.119. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
PMID: 29971207RESULTGaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, Martin-Lefevre L, Pons B, Boulet E, Boyer A, Chevrel G, Lerolle N, Carpentier D, de Prost N, Lautrette A, Bretagnol A, Mayaux J, Nseir S, Megarbane B, Thirion M, Forel JM, Maizel J, Yonis H, Markowicz P, Thiery G, Tubach F, Ricard JD, Dreyfuss D; AKIKI Study Group. Initiation Strategies for Renal-Replacement Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):122-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603017. Epub 2016 May 15.
PMID: 27181456RESULTZarbock A, Kellum JA, Schmidt C, Van Aken H, Wempe C, Pavenstadt H, Boanta A, Gerss J, Meersch M. Effect of Early vs Delayed Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: The ELAIN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 May 24-31;315(20):2190-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5828.
PMID: 27209269RESULTBarbar SD, Clere-Jehl R, Bourredjem A, Hernu R, Montini F, Bruyere R, Lebert C, Bohe J, Badie J, Eraldi JP, Rigaud JP, Levy B, Siami S, Louis G, Bouadma L, Constantin JM, Mercier E, Klouche K, du Cheyron D, Piton G, Annane D, Jaber S, van der Linden T, Blasco G, Mira JP, Schwebel C, Chimot L, Guiot P, Nay MA, Meziani F, Helms J, Roger C, Louart B, Trusson R, Dargent A, Binquet C, Quenot JP; IDEAL-ICU Trial Investigators and the CRICS TRIGGERSEP Network. Timing of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Patients with Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2018 Oct 11;379(15):1431-1442. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1803213.
PMID: 30304656RESULTSTARRT-AKI Investigators; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group; United Kingdom Critical Care Research Group; Canadian Nephrology Trials Network; Irish Critical Care Trials Group; Bagshaw SM, Wald R, Adhikari NKJ, Bellomo R, da Costa BR, Dreyfuss D, Du B, Gallagher MP, Gaudry S, Hoste EA, Lamontagne F, Joannidis M, Landoni G, Liu KD, McAuley DF, McGuinness SP, Neyra JA, Nichol AD, Ostermann M, Palevsky PM, Pettila V, Quenot JP, Qiu H, Rochwerg B, Schneider AG, Smith OM, Thome F, Thorpe KE, Vaara S, Weir M, Wang AY, Young P, Zarbock A. Timing of Initiation of Renal-Replacement Therapy in Acute Kidney Injury. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jul 16;383(3):240-251. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2000741.
PMID: 32668114RESULTGaudry S, Hajage D, Martin-Lefevre L, Lebbah S, Louis G, Moschietto S, Titeca-Beauport D, Combe B, Pons B, de Prost N, Besset S, Combes A, Robine A, Beuzelin M, Badie J, Chevrel G, Bohe J, Coupez E, Chudeau N, Barbar S, Vinsonneau C, Forel JM, Thevenin D, Boulet E, Lakhal K, Aissaoui N, Grange S, Leone M, Lacave G, Nseir S, Poirson F, Mayaux J, Asehnoune K, Geri G, Klouche K, Thiery G, Argaud L, Rozec B, Cadoz C, Andreu P, Reignier J, Ricard JD, Quenot JP, Dreyfuss D. Comparison of two delayed strategies for renal replacement therapy initiation for severe acute kidney injury (AKIKI 2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Apr 3;397(10281):1293-1300. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00350-0.
PMID: 33812488RESULTAkhoundi A, Singh B, Vela M, Chaudhary S, Monaghan M, Wilson GA, Dillon JJ, Cartin-Ceba R, Lieske JC, Gajic O, Kashani K. Incidence of Adverse Events during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Blood Purif. 2015;39(4):333-9. doi: 10.1159/000380903. Epub 2015 May 22.
PMID: 26022612RESULTChawla LS, Davison DL, Brasha-Mitchell E, Koyner JL, Arthur JM, Shaw AD, Tumlin JA, Trevino SA, Kimmel PL, Seneff MG. Development and standardization of a furosemide stress test to predict the severity of acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2013 Sep 20;17(5):R207. doi: 10.1186/cc13015.
PMID: 24053972RESULTLumlertgul N, Peerapornratana S, Trakarnvanich T, Pongsittisak W, Surasit K, Chuasuwan A, Tankee P, Tiranathanagul K, Praditpornsilpa K, Tungsanga K, Eiam-Ong S, Kellum JA, Srisawat N; FST Study Group. Early versus standard initiation of renal replacement therapy in furosemide stress test non-responsive acute kidney injury patients (the FST trial). Crit Care. 2018 Apr 19;22(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2021-1.
PMID: 29673370RESULTLewis M, Bromley K, Sutton CJ, McCray G, Myers HL, Lancaster GA. Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: the hypothesis test strikes back! Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Feb 3;7(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00770-x.
PMID: 33536076RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 1, 2024
First Posted
January 29, 2024
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2028
Last Updated
March 24, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share