EXOPULSE Mollii Suit, Motor Function & Stroke (EXOSTROKE 2)
EXOSTROKE2
The Effects of EXOPULSE Mollii Suit on Motor Functions in Patients With Stroke (EXOSTROKE 2)"
1 other identifier
interventional
36
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the improvement of motor functions related symptoms in patients with stroke and spasticity using Exopulse Mollii suit stimulation. The main questions it aims to answer are: to evaluate the short-term impact of EXOPULSE Mollii suit on balance in adult patients with stroke and suffering from spasticity. to assess the effects of Exopulse Mollii suit on spasticity, mobility, pain, fatigue and QoL. . Participants will participate in: One baseline visit for inclusion during which the patient will undergo the first session (active or sham) along with evaluations (before and after the session) One visit after two weeks during which the patient will undergo the second session (active or sham) along with evaluations (before and after the session) One visit after two weeks of the second stimulation condition; the patients will undergo a third evaluation and receive the EXOPULSE Mollii Suit for the four-week open label phase and will use the suit at home for an active stimulation session every other day for four weeks. One visit at the end of the open label phase to perform the fourth and last evaluation and return the EXOPULSE Mollii suit. Researchers will compare both Active and Sham groups to demonstrate the improvement of motor functions related symptoms in patients with stroke and spasticity using Exopulse Mollii suit.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable stroke
Started Oct 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 20, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 22, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 2, 2024
CompletedJanuary 22, 2024
January 1, 2024
1 year
November 20, 2023
January 17, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Balance using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Balance will be assessed using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale (BBS) which has good psychometric properties in patients with stroke (concurrent validity, interrater reliability). The scale rates the balance using 56 points, with higher scores indicating better balance abilities. A score equal to or below 45 is commonly associated with risk of fall across the literature.
To be assessed at baseline.
Balance using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Balance will be assessed using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale (BBS) which has good psychometric properties in patients with stroke (concurrent validity, interrater reliability). The scale rates the balance using 56 points, with higher scores indicating better balance abilities. A score equal to or below 45 is commonly associated with risk of fall across the literature.
To be assessed at week 2.
Balance using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Balance will be assessed using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale (BBS) which has good psychometric properties in patients with stroke (concurrent validity, interrater reliability). The scale rates the balance using 56 points, with higher scores indicating better balance abilities. A score equal to or below 45 is commonly associated with risk of fall across the literature.
To be assessed at week 4.
Balance using Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Balance will be assessed using the 14-item Berg Balance Scale (BBS) which has good psychometric properties in patients with stroke (concurrent validity, interrater reliability). The scale rates the balance using 56 points, with higher scores indicating better balance abilities. A score equal to or below 45 is commonly associated with risk of fall across the literature.
To be assessed at week 8.
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Visual Analog Score for spasticity.
This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2, week 4 and week 8.
Visual Analog Score for pain.
This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2, week 4 and week 8.
EQ-5D-5L: EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels Quality of Life Questionnaire
Two weeks after the second stimulation and 4 weeks later at the end of phase 2.
Overall Clinical improvement
This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2, and week 8.
Blinding Questionnaire
This to be assessed at baseline, then at week 2.
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EXOPULSE Mollii Suit Stimulation Active
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis will be the EXOPULSE Mollii Suit Active Stimulation. Stimulation will go on for 60 minutes while control unit is on for 60 minutes
EXOPULSE Mollii Suit Stimulation Sham
SHAM COMPARATORThis will be the EXOPULSE Mollii Suit Sham Stimulation. Stimulation will go on for 1 minute then it turns off while the control unit will remain on for total of 60 minutes.
Interventions
We designed a randomized crossover, sham-controlled, double-blind trial to demonstrate the improvement of motor functions and stroke related symptoms following a single session of "active" versus "sham" EXOPULSE Mollii suit stimulation. in phase 1, the patient will receive two stimulations separated by a two-week washout period. The patients will be randomized to receive either active/sham or sham/active and both patients and investigators will be blinded to the order in which the stimulation will be given. A 2-week washout period should be enough to prevent a potential carry over effect. Two weeks after the end of phase 1, a second open label phase (phase 2) of this trial will be proposed to all patients where they will receive active stimulation every other day at home over four weeks (for a total of 14 sessions). This will help understand the long term effects of EXOPULSE Mollii suit stimulation on stroke related symptoms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 75 years.
- Having a clinical diagnosis of stroke since at least three months.
- Being able to walk freely or with the need of support (modified Rankin score ≤ 4).
- Able to understand verbal instructions.
- Having spasticity with a score of at least 1+ on the MAS.
- Having a BBS score ≤46 associated in the literature with a risk of fall.
You may not qualify if:
- Being included in another research protocol during the study period.
- Inability to undergo medical monitor for the study purposes due to geographical or social reasons.
- Having a cardiac stimulator, a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, an intrathecal baclofen pump or other contraindications to using EXOPULSE Mollii suit.
- Being pregnant.
- Having a change in their stroke pharmacological therapy in the last three months.
- Suffering from other somatic or neuropsychiatric diagnoses (e.g., arrhythmias, uncontrolled epilepsy, diseases causing osteoarticular and muscular pain).
- Having a body mass index above 35 Kg/m2.
- In case of the introduction of a medical device other than EXOPULSE Mollii suit during the study period.
- Patients under juridical protection.
- Prisoners.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
SSMC
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
Related Publications (71)
Andringa A, van de Port I, van Wegen E, Ket J, Meskers C, Kwakkel G. Effectiveness of Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Upper Limb Spasticity Poststroke Over Different ICF Domains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Sep;100(9):1703-1725. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.01.016. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
PMID: 30796921BACKGROUNDAndersen IT, Harrison A, Broholm R, Harder A, Nielsen JB, Bulow J, Pingel J. Microvascularization is not a limiting factor for exercise in adults with cerebral palsy. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 Aug 1;125(2):536-544. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00827.2017. Epub 2018 May 3.
PMID: 29722625BACKGROUNDAree-uea B, Auvichayapat N, Janyacharoen T, Siritaratiwat W, Amatachaya A, Prasertnoo J, Tunkamnerdthai O, Thinkhamrop B, Jensen MP, Auvichayapat P. Reduction of spasticity in cerebral palsy by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation. J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Sep;97(9):954-62.
PMID: 25536713BACKGROUNDBakaniene I, Urbonaviciene G, Janaviciute K, Prasauskiene A. Effects of the Inerventions method on gross motor function in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2018 Sep-Oct;52(5):581-586. doi: 10.1016/j.pjnns.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 20.
PMID: 30061001BACKGROUNDBar-On L, Molenaers G, Aertbelien E, Van Campenhout A, Feys H, Nuttin B, Desloovere K. Spasticity and its contribution to hypertonia in cerebral palsy. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:317047. doi: 10.1155/2015/317047. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
PMID: 25649546BACKGROUNDBarnes, M.P (2008). Upper Motor Neuone Syndrome and Spasticity: Clinical Management and Neurophysiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
BACKGROUNDBaude M, Nielsen JB, Gracies JM. The neurophysiology of deforming spastic paresis: A revised taxonomy. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Nov;62(6):426-430. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
PMID: 30500361BACKGROUNDBethoux F. Spasticity Management After Stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015 Nov;26(4):625-39. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2015.07.003. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
PMID: 26522902BACKGROUNDBohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7. doi: 10.1093/ptj/67.2.206.
PMID: 3809245BACKGROUNDBonita R, Beaglehole R. Recovery of motor function after stroke. Stroke. 1988 Dec;19(12):1497-500. doi: 10.1161/01.str.19.12.1497.
PMID: 3201508BACKGROUNDBurke D, Wissel J, Donnan GA. Pathophysiology of spasticity in stroke. Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3 Suppl 2):S20-6. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827624a7.
PMID: 23319482BACKGROUNDBusner J, Targum SD. The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. Psychiatry (Edgmont). 2007 Jul;4(7):28-37.
PMID: 20526405BACKGROUNDCamak DJ. Addressing the burden of stroke caregivers: a literature review. J Clin Nurs. 2015 Sep;24(17-18):2376-82. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12884. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
PMID: 26095074BACKGROUNDCampbell WI, Lewis S. Visual analogue measurement of pain. Ulster Med J. 1990 Oct;59(2):149-54.
PMID: 2278111BACKGROUNDCech, D. J., & Martin, S. T. (2012). Chapter 5 - Evaluation of Function, Activity, and Participation. In D. J. Cech & S. T. Martin (Eds.), Functional Movement Development Across the Life Span (Third Edition) (pp. 88-104). Saint Louis: W.B. Saunders.
BACKGROUNDChan PP, Si Tou JI, Tse MM, Ng SS. Reliability and Validity of the Timed Up and Go Test With a Motor Task in People With Chronic Stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Nov;98(11):2213-2220. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
PMID: 28392324BACKGROUNDCogiamanian F, Ardolino G, Vergari M, Ferrucci R, Ciocca M, Scelzo E, Barbieri S, Priori A. Transcutaneous spinal direct current stimulation. Front Psychiatry. 2012 Jul 4;3:63. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00063. eCollection 2012.
PMID: 22783208BACKGROUNDDenno MS, Gillard PJ, Graham GD, DiBonaventura MD, Goren A, Varon SF, Zorowitz R. Anxiety and depression associated with caregiver burden in caregivers of stroke survivors with spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1731-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
PMID: 23548544BACKGROUNDErtzgaard P, Alwin J, Sorbo A, Lindgren M, Sandsjo L. Evaluation of a self-administered transcutaneous electrical stimulation concept for the treatment of spasticity: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):507-517. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04791-8. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
PMID: 29072043BACKGROUNDFarid L, Jacobs D, Do Santos J, Simon O, Gracies JM, Hutin E. FeetMe(R) Monitor-connected insoles are a valid and reliable alternative for the evaluation of gait speed after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2021 Mar;28(2):127-134. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2020.1792717. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
PMID: 32654627BACKGROUNDFarrar JT, Troxel AB, Stott C, Duncombe P, Jensen MP. Validity, reliability, and clinical importance of change in a 0-10 numeric rating scale measure of spasticity: a post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Ther. 2008 May;30(5):974-85. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.05.011.
PMID: 18555944BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PMID: 17695343BACKGROUNDFlodstrom C, Viklund Axelsson SA, Nordstrom B. A pilot study of the impact of the electro-suit Mollii(R) on body functions, activity, and participation in children with cerebral palsy. Assist Technol. 2022 Jul 4;34(4):411-417. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2020.1837288. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
PMID: 33151822BACKGROUNDGan SM, Tung LC, Tang YH, Wang CH. Psychometric properties of functional balance assessment in children with cerebral palsy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):745-53. doi: 10.1177/1545968308316474. Epub 2008 Jul 21.
PMID: 18645187BACKGROUNDGanapathy V, Graham GD, DiBonaventura MD, Gillard PJ, Goren A, Zorowitz RD. Caregiver burden, productivity loss, and indirect costs associated with caring for patients with poststroke spasticity. Clin Interv Aging. 2015 Nov 6;10:1793-802. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S91123. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26609225BACKGROUNDGoldstein LB, Bertels C, Davis JN. Interrater reliability of the NIH stroke scale. Arch Neurol. 1989 Jun;46(6):660-2. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1989.00520420080026.
PMID: 2730378BACKGROUNDGolicki D, Niewada M, Buczek J, Karlinska A, Kobayashi A, Janssen MF, Pickard AS. Validity of EQ-5D-5L in stroke. Qual Life Res. 2015 Apr;24(4):845-50. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0834-1. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
PMID: 25347978BACKGROUNDGrassi B, Quaresima V. Near-infrared spectroscopy and skeletal muscle oxidative function in vivo in health and disease: a review from an exercise physiology perspective. J Biomed Opt. 2016 Sep;21(9):091313. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.091313.
PMID: 27443955BACKGROUNDGupta AD, Chu WH, Howell S, Chakraborty S, Koblar S, Visvanathan R, Cameron I, Wilson D. A systematic review: efficacy of botulinum toxin in walking and quality of life in post-stroke lower limb spasticity. Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 5;7(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0670-9.
PMID: 29304876BACKGROUNDHaefeli M, Elfering A. Pain assessment. Eur Spine J. 2006 Jan;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S17-24. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1044-x. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
PMID: 16320034BACKGROUNDJohnson, M.I. (2008). Trancutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). In: Watson T, ed. Electrotherapy, Evidence based practice, 11th ed. Edinburgh:Churchill Livingstone, 253e296.
BACKGROUNDKrause P, Edrich T, Straube A. Lumbar repetitive magnetic stimulation reduces spastic tone increase of the lower limbs. Spinal Cord. 2004 Feb;42(2):67-72. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101564.
PMID: 14765138BACKGROUNDKuo, C.-L., & Hu, G.-C. (2018). Post-stroke Spasticity: A Review of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Treatments. Int J Gerontol. 12, 280-284.
BACKGROUNDLance, J. (1980). "Symposium synopsis," in Spasticity: Disordered Motor Control, R. G. Feldman, R. R. Young, and W. P. Koella, Eds., pp. 485-494, Yearbook Medical, Chicago, Ill, USA.
BACKGROUNDLecoffre C, de Peretti C, Gabet A, Grimaud O, Woimant F, Giroud M, Bejot Y, Olie V. National Trends in Patients Hospitalized for Stroke and Stroke Mortality in France, 2008 to 2014. Stroke. 2017 Nov;48(11):2939-2945. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.017640. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
PMID: 28970279BACKGROUNDLerdal A, Bakken LN, Kouwenhoven SE, Pedersen G, Kirkevold M, Finset A, Kim HS. Poststroke fatigue--a review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Dec;38(6):928-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.028.
PMID: 19811888BACKGROUNDLittle WJ. The classic: Hospital for the cure of deformities: course of lectures on the deformities of the human frame. 1843. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 May;470(5):1252-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2302-y.
PMID: 22402809BACKGROUNDMaeda N, Urabe Y, Murakami M, Itotani K, Kato J. Discriminant analysis for predictor of falls in stroke patients by using the Berg Balance Scale. Singapore Med J. 2015 May;56(5):280-3. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015033.
PMID: 25678051BACKGROUNDMai J, Pedersen E. Mode of action of dantrolene sodium in spasticity. Acta Neurol Scand. 1979 Jun;59(6):309-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1979.tb02941.x.
PMID: 158280BACKGROUNDMalanga G, Reiter RD, Garay E. Update on tizanidine for muscle spasticity and emerging indications. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2008 Aug;9(12):2209-15. doi: 10.1517/14656566.9.12.2209.
PMID: 18671474BACKGROUNDMarkus, H. (2008). Stroke: causes and clinical features. Medicine, 36, 586-91.
BACKGROUNDMcDougall J, Chow E, Harris RL, Mills PB. Near-infrared spectroscopy as a quantitative spasticity assessment tool: A systematic review. J Neurol Sci. 2020 May 15;412:116729. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2020.116729. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
PMID: 32120130BACKGROUNDMeseguer-Henarejos AB, Sanchez-Meca J, Lopez-Pina JA, Carles-Hernandez R. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):576-590. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04796-7. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
PMID: 28901119BACKGROUNDMills PB, Dossa F. Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Management of Limb Spasticity: A Systematic Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Apr;95(4):309-18. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000437.
PMID: 26829077BACKGROUNDMukherjee A, Chakravarty A. Spasticity mechanisms - for the clinician. Front Neurol. 2010 Dec 17;1:149. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2010.00149. eCollection 2010.
PMID: 21206767BACKGROUNDNg SS, Hui-Chan CW. The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Aug;86(8):1641-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.01.011.
PMID: 16084820BACKGROUNDNielsen JB, Petersen NT, Crone C, Sinkjaer T. Stretch reflex regulation in healthy subjects and patients with spasticity. Neuromodulation. 2005 Jan;8(1):49-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1094-7159.2005.05220.x.
PMID: 22151383BACKGROUNDNordstrom B, Prellwitz M. A pilot study of children and parents experiences of the use of a new assistive device, the electro suit Mollii. Assist Technol. 2021 Sep 3;33(5):238-245. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2019.1579267. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
PMID: 30945989BACKGROUNDPalisano RJ, Cameron D, Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Russell D. Stability of the gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006 Jun;48(6):424-8. doi: 10.1017/S0012162206000934.
PMID: 16700931BACKGROUNDPalmcrantz S, Pennati GV, Bergling H, Borg J. Feasibility and potential effects of using the electro-dress Mollii on spasticity and functioning in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 10;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00740-z.
PMID: 32778118BACKGROUNDPandyan AD, Gregoric M, Barnes MP, Wood D, Van Wijck F, Burridge J, Hermens H, Johnson GR. Spasticity: clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement. Disabil Rehabil. 2005 Jan 7-21;27(1-2):2-6. doi: 10.1080/09638280400014576. No abstract available.
PMID: 15799140BACKGROUNDPerrot A, Castanier C, Maillot P, Zitari H. French validation of the modified-falls efficacy scale (M-FES Fr). Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2018 Sep-Oct;78:233-239. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
PMID: 30025268BACKGROUNDPicelli A, Santamato A, Chemello E, Cinone N, Cisari C, Gandolfi M, Ranieri M, Smania N, Baricich A. Adjuvant treatments associated with botulinum toxin injection for managing spasticity: An overview of the literature. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Jul;62(4):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
PMID: 30219307BACKGROUNDRabchevsky AG, Kitzman PH. Latest approaches for the treatment of spasticity and autonomic dysreflexia in chronic spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2011 Apr;8(2):274-82. doi: 10.1007/s13311-011-0025-5.
PMID: 21384222BACKGROUNDRo T, Ota T, Saito T, Oikawa O. Spasticity and Range of Motion Over Time in Stroke Patients Who Received Multiple-Dose Botulinum Toxin Therapy. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jan;29(1):104481. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104481. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
PMID: 31699575BACKGROUNDSadowska M, Sarecka-Hujar B, Kopyta I. Cerebral Palsy: Current Opinions on Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification and Treatment Options. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020 Jun 12;16:1505-1518. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S235165. eCollection 2020.
PMID: 32606703BACKGROUNDSanger TD, Delgado MR, Gaebler-Spira D, Hallett M, Mink JW; Task Force on Childhood Motor Disorders. Classification and definition of disorders causing hypertonia in childhood. Pediatrics. 2003 Jan;111(1):e89-97. doi: 10.1542/peds.111.1.e89.
PMID: 12509602BACKGROUNDStevenson T. Berg balance test. Phys Ther. 1996 Oct;76(10):1124, 1126. doi: 10.1093/ptj/76.10.1124. No abstract available.
PMID: 8863765BACKGROUNDStinear C, Ackerley S, Byblow W. Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not: a systematic review. Stroke. 2013 Jul;44(7):2039-45. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000968. Epub 2013 May 28. No abstract available.
PMID: 23715959BACKGROUNDRoche N, Lackmy A, Achache V, Bussel B, Katz R. Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area on lumbar spinal network excitability in healthy subjects. J Physiol. 2011 Jun 1;589(Pt 11):2813-26. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.205161. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
PMID: 21502292BACKGROUNDSommerfeld DK, Gripenstedt U, Welmer AK. Spasticity after stroke: an overview of prevalence, test instruments, and treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Sep;91(9):814-20. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31825f13a3.
PMID: 22760104BACKGROUNDTuppin P, Riviere S, Rigault A, Tala S, Drouin J, Pestel L, Denis P, Gastaldi-Menager C, Gissot C, Juilliere Y, Fagot-Campagna A. Prevalence and economic burden of cardiovascular diseases in France in 2013 according to the national health insurance scheme database. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016 Jun-Jul;109(6-7):399-411. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
PMID: 27079468BACKGROUNDVivancos-Matellano F, Pascual-Pascual SI, Nardi-Vilardaga J, Miquel-Rodriguez F, de Miguel-Leon I, Martinez-Garre MC, Martinez-Caballero I, Lanzas-Melendo G, Garreta-Figuera R, Garcia-Ruiz PJ, Garcia-Bach M, Garcia-Aymerich V, Bori-Fortuny I, Aguilar-Barbera M; Spanish Group on Spasticity. [Guide to the comprehensive treatment of spasticity]. Rev Neurol. 2007 Sep 16-30;45(6):365-75. Spanish.
PMID: 17899519BACKGROUNDWade DT. Measuring arm impairment and disability after stroke. Int Disabil Stud. 1989 Apr-Jun;11(2):89-92. doi: 10.3109/03790798909166398.
PMID: 2698395BACKGROUNDWard AB. A literature review of the pathophysiology and onset of post-stroke spasticity. Eur J Neurol. 2012 Jan;19(1):21-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2011.03448.x. Epub 2011 Jun 27.
PMID: 21707868BACKGROUNDWHO (2004). The atlas of heart disease and stroke / Judith Mackay and George Mensah ; with Shanthi Mendis and Kurt Greenland. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43007
BACKGROUNDWHO (2019). Accident vasculaire cérébral (AVC). Disponible sur http://www.who.int/topics/cerebrovascular_accident/fr/
BACKGROUNDWinkler T, Hering P, Straube A. Spinal DC stimulation in humans modulates post-activation depression of the H-reflex depending on current polarity. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jun;121(6):957-61. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.014. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
PMID: 20153248BACKGROUNDWu D, Qian L, Zorowitz RD, Zhang L, Qu Y, Yuan Y. Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Jan;94(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.07.022. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
PMID: 22878231BACKGROUNDZawawi NSM, Aziz NA, Fisher R, Ahmad K, Walker MF. The Unmet Needs of Stroke Survivors and Stroke Caregivers: A Systematic Narrative Review. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104875. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104875. Epub 2020 May 23.
PMID: 32689648BACKGROUNDZorowitz RD, Gillard PJ, Brainin M. Poststroke spasticity: sequelae and burden on stroke survivors and caregivers. Neurology. 2013 Jan 15;80(3 Suppl 2):S45-52. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182764c86.
PMID: 23319485BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Naji J Riachi, MD
SSMC
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 20, 2023
First Posted
January 22, 2024
Study Start
October 24, 2023
Primary Completion
October 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 2, 2024
Last Updated
January 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share