NCT06211998

Brief Summary

Asthma is a worldwide health problem and is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood in most countries. Symptoms begin before the age of 5 years in 80% of children with asthma, but the diagnosis is not always easy. The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) expert panel recommends spirometry testing for children over 5 years of age. Spirometry measurements include forced vital capacity (FVC) and the forced expiratory volume in first second (FEV1). Airflow obstruction is defined as FEV1 reduced to less than 80 percent predicted and an FEV1/FVC ratio of less than 0.85 (85 percent). Reference values are based on age, height, sex, and race. Forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75 percent of vital capacity (FEF25-75) less than 65 percent correlates with reversible airflow obstruction in children with normal FEV1 and may be a useful measure in this subgroup. In the spirometry test, FEV1, FVC, FEF 25-75% values are valuable for the follow-up of asthma. While the FEV1/FVC ratio is above 80% in healthy children, it may decrease below 75% in diseases such as asthma. Likewise, FEV1 and FEF can be found to be low in 50-75% of asthma patients. In addition, these values can be used to determine the effectiveness of the inhaler given with the nebulizer given during the attack. Spirometry should be performed before and after administration of a bronchodilator to assess for reversibility (bronchodilator response \[BDR\]) even in children with a normal baseline FEV1 because many of these children will still have a BDR (both within the normal range and sometimes also supranormal) after treatment. Significant reversibility is indicated by an increase in FEV1 of ≥12 percent from baseline after administration of a short-acting bronchodilator. This definition for BDR positivity was established primarily in adults. An increase in FEV1 of ≥8 percent may be a better definition for BDR in children. Inhaled short-acting beta-2 agonists, particularly albuterol (salbutamol), are the standard emergent treatment for acute asthma exacerbations in all patients based upon adult data. It is recommended to be given every 20 minutes in case of need for repeated doses in mild and moderate asthma attacks. Different types of nebulizers can be used for inhaler therapy; they can convert drugs into vapor form with sound waves, compressed air or by using electrical energy. While compressor nebulizers convert the liquid drug into aerosol form with compressed air, mesh nebulizers convert the drug into aerosol form with the vibrations they create with the help of electrical energy. Mesh nebulizers are more effective than other types of nebulizers, and the amount left in the chamber is less than other models, and it can decompose the drug into smaller particles and reach the more extreme branches of the lung. In our study, the investigators aimed to determine which nebulizer type is more effective by comparing the effects of mesh nebulizer and compressor nebulizer on spirometry test in children presenting with asthma attack. Thus, the investigators planned to find the most comfortable and effective method for patients by determining the appropriate nebulization technique for patients.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable asthma

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable asthma

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2022

Completed
12 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 15, 2023

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 25, 2023

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 18, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

January 18, 2024

Status Verified

January 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

December 25, 2023

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

AsthmaChildCompressor NebulizerMesh NebulizerPulmonary function test

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Mesh nebulizer improves pulmonary function test results more effectively in children

    Pulmonary function test results in children using mesh nebulizers may be improving more effectively. To compare mesh and compressor nebulizers, we planned to compare FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, FEF 25-75 and PEF in pulmonary function testing.

    1 hour

Study Arms (2)

Group receiving inhaled treatment with compressor nebulizer

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Salbutamol inhaler, Omron® CompAIR Pro NE-C900 Compressor Nebulizer (Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) was used in Group 1

Device: Group 1

Group receiving inhaled treatment with mesh nebulizer

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Salbutamol inhaler, Mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo®, Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) was used in Group 2

Device: Group 2

Interventions

Group 1DEVICE

Salbutamol inhaler, Omron® CompAIR Pro NE-C900 Compressor Nebulizer (Omron Healthcare Co., Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) was used in Group 1

Group receiving inhaled treatment with compressor nebulizer
Group 2DEVICE

Salbutamol inhaler, Mesh nebulizer (Aerogen Solo®, Aerogen Ltd, Galway, Ireland) was used in Group 2

Group receiving inhaled treatment with mesh nebulizer

Eligibility Criteria

Age7 Years - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Asthma attack patients who need inhaler therapy (salbutamol)
  • Patients aged 7-15 years and whose families gave consent for the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with neuromotor impairment
  • Patients with underlying chronic disease (neurological disease such as epilepsy or congenital heart disease)
  • Patients with obesity or malnutrition (to equalize drug dose efficacy)
  • Patients with those receiving adrenaline, budesonide or ipratropium bromide therapy
  • Patients who have used a long-acting bronchodilator in the last 12 hours or a short-acting bronchodilator in the last 2 hours
  • Patients with fever above 37.5°C
  • Patients with a saturation value below 92% at the time of admission
  • Patients with severe asthma attack
  • Patients with respiratory failure
  • Patients who had problems in performing the test (such as mental retardation, patient incompatibility)
  • Patients with diseases involving the chest muscles and those with chronic lung diseases (such as cystic fibrosis, bronchiectasis)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

UHS Haseki Training and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Sultangazi, 34304, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Dunne RB, Shortt S. Comparison of bronchodilator administration with vibrating mesh nebulizer and standard jet nebulizer in the emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):641-646. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.10.067. Epub 2017 Oct 31.

    PMID: 29167030BACKGROUND
  • Pitance L, Vecellio L, Leal T, Reychler G, Reychler H, Liistro G. Delivery efficacy of a vibrating mesh nebulizer and a jet nebulizer under different configurations. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010 Dec;23(6):389-96. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2010.0816. Epub 2010 Oct 19.

    PMID: 20958144BACKGROUND
  • Yuksel H, Yasar A, Acikel A, Topcu I, Yilmaz O. Two different methods of lidocaine inhalation before diagnostic flexible bronchoscopy: effects on post-bronchoscopy respiratory symptoms. Turk J Med Sci. 2021 Aug 30;51(4):2101-2106. doi: 10.3906/sag-2012-130.

    PMID: 34013705BACKGROUND
  • Okay B, Hatipoglu HU, Okay ZU, Sahin K, Yasar A. Comparing mesh and compressor nebulizers in pulmonary function test in pediatric asthma attacks: A double-blind randomized comparative clinical trial. Respir Med. 2025 Mar;238:107966. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2025.107966. Epub 2025 Jan 28.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesRespiratory HypersensitivityHypersensitivity, ImmediateHypersensitivityImmune System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
M.D.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 25, 2023

First Posted

January 18, 2024

Study Start

August 1, 2022

Primary Completion

July 15, 2023

Study Completion

August 1, 2023

Last Updated

January 18, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations