NCT06206668

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to analyze whether observing the actions of a referent selected by the participants improves balance in asymptomatic individuals compared to those who observe a standard referent.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
165

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 31, 2023

Completed
16 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 16, 2024

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2024

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 9, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

December 31, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Action observationReferentGenderBalance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Static balance

    Center of pressure analysis: The displacement of the center of pressure (CPD) of the participants will be measured through posturographic tests performed on a force platform. The following variables related to the center of pressure (CoP) will be calculated: the roll area (in square millimeters) and the distribution of the weight load on both sides.

    1 month

  • Dynamic Balance

    A modified and abbreviated version of the Star Excursion Balance Test, known as mSEBT, will be used. This test has been standardized and validated, and requires a board or floor with three lines indicating directions of movement: anterior (ANT), posteromedial (PM), and posterolateral (PL). These lines form a Y, with an angle of 90° between PM and PL, and 135° between ANT and PM, and ANT and PL.

    1 month

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • Age

    1 day

  • Biological sex

    1 day

  • Weight

    1 day

  • Height

    1 day

  • Body mass index (BMI)

    1 day

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Participants will watch a video of landscapes without human or animal movement.

Intervention Group with Referent (GIR)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will observe actions whose referent has been selected by themselves based on perceived similarity. A total of 16 different videos will be used, with 4 new videos each week. The videos will gradually increase in difficulty as the study progresses. All exercises are exercises used to improve balance.

Other: Action observation videos

Standard Intervention Group (GIE)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will observe actions with a standard reference. In this case, a basic digitally designed faceless doll will be used. A total of 16 different videos will be used, with 4 new videos each week. The videos will gradually increase in difficulty as the study progresses. All exercises are exercises used to improve balance.

Other: Action observation videos

Interventions

The participant will see videos of balance exercises performed by the assigned reference, depending on their group, without performing any physical movement.

Intervention Group with Referent (GIR)Standard Intervention Group (GIE)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Be of legal age.
  • Have a mobile device.
  • Have normal or corrected-to-normal vision.
  • Absence of neurological, orthopedic or vestibular disorders.
  • Absence of specific balance skills due to competitive sports.
  • Obtain a score of 3 or less on the Tegner activity scale.
  • Having voluntarily signed the informed consent and being willing to follow the protocol proposed by the research team.

You may not qualify if:

  • History of participation in any study with movement representation methods.
  • Subjects with impaired communication and/or compression.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Centre Tecnològic de Nutrició i Salut Eurecat

Reus, Tarragona, 43203, Spain

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Gatti R, Sarasso E, Pelachin M, Agosta F, Filippi M, Tettamanti A. Can action observation modulate balance performance in healthy subjects? Arch Physiother. 2019 Jan 22;9:1. doi: 10.1186/s40945-018-0053-0. eCollection 2019.

    PMID: 30693101BACKGROUND
  • Moon Y, Bae Y. The effect of backward walking observational training on gait parameters and balance in chronic stroke: randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Feb;58(1):9-15. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.21.06869-6. Epub 2021 Sep 1.

    PMID: 34468110BACKGROUND
  • Picot B, Terrier R, Forestier N, Fourchet F, O.McKeon F. The Star Excursion Balance Test: An Update Review and Practical Guidelines. Int. J. Athl. Ther. Train. 2021 Jul 20,26(6):285-93. doi: 10.1123/ijatt.2020-0106.

    BACKGROUND
  • Leem SH, Kim JH, Lee BH. Effects of Otago exercise combined with action observation training on balance and gait in the old people. J Exerc Rehabil. 2019 Dec 31;15(6):848-854. doi: 10.12965/jer.1938720.360. eCollection 2019 Dec.

    PMID: 31938708BACKGROUND
  • Cuenca-Martinez F, Suso-Marti L, Sanchez-Martin D, Soria-Soria C, Serrano-Santos J, Paris-Alemany A, La Touche R, Leon-Hernandez JV. Effects of Motor Imagery and Action Observation on Lumbo-pelvic Motor Control, Trunk Muscles Strength and Level of Perceived Fatigue: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2020 Mar;91(1):34-46. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2019.1645941. Epub 2019 Oct 18.

    PMID: 31626568BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Coitus

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Sexual BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Cristina Adillón Camón, Dra.

    University Rovira i Virgili

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2023

First Posted

January 16, 2024

Study Start

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion

June 30, 2024

Study Completion

January 30, 2025

Last Updated

March 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations