Erector Spinae Plane Block vs Local Infiltration Following Fusion Surgery
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Erector Spinae Plane Blocks Versus High Volume Local Infiltration Analgesia on Pain, Inflammation and Cognitive Outcomes Following Thoraco-Lumbar Fusion Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed intervention will examine two alternative methods for postoperative pain control. Two treatment arms of this study will include subjects who receive an erector spinae block (ESP) after induction of anesthesia but prior to the start of surgery and subjects who will receive a high volume of local anesthetic infiltration at the end of the procedure before emergence from anesthesia. The control group of subjects will undergo spinal surgery with general anesthesia but without any regional anesthesia. Outcome measurements include evaluation of serum inflammatory markers, pain scores, opioid usage and standardized evidence-based assessment methodologies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_2
Started May 2024
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 29, 2025
CompletedFebruary 13, 2026
May 1, 2025
12 months
December 28, 2023
February 10, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison of Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) Scores Between Treatment Groups
The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) is a patient reported assessment aimed to validate the patients recovery following surgical intervention. The subject is asked to provide a quantitative number to a series of questions. The answers are rated on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 = none of the time and 10 = all of the time. The scores for all of the questions are summed and comparison between the treatment groups will be assessed.
Change from pre-operation score to 1 day after surgery date
Quantitate the Change in Delirium Symptoms; Pre- to post-operative day 1
Potential new onset of delirium following surgical procedure will be assessed using the standardized 3D CAM ASSESSMENT (3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM)). The subject is asked a series of questions and their responses are recorded. This structured mental status assessment is designed to detect the presence or absence of delirium. "The CAM algorithm is considered positive if the following features are present: Feature 1) Acute onset or fluctuating course and Feature 2) Inattention and either Feature 3) Disorganized thinking or Feature 4) Altered level of consciousness." Comparison between the treatment groups will be assessed and the presence of post-operative delirium reported. Reference: Marcantonio et al., (PMID: 25329203) and training manual.
Change from pre-operation score to 1 day after surgery date
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Quantitate the Change in Delirium Symptoms; Pre- to post-operative day 3
Change from pre-operation score to 3 days after surgery date
Study Arms (3)
Group GA: General anesthesia only
NO INTERVENTIONThis group receives general anesthesia only and surgical procedure will follow standard conditions.
Group ESP: Erector Spinae Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group receives general anesthesia with regional pain block (Erector Spinae Block) prior to incision.
Group LIA: Local Infiltration
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group receives general anesthesia and surgical procedure will take place as planned. Prior to being awakened, the area of procedure will be infiltrated.
Interventions
General anesthesia with Erector Spinae Plane Block
General anesthesia with local infiltration of local anesthetic:
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: Greater than 18 years but less than 80
- Surgical procedure: 1 to 2 level thoraco-lumbar fusion between T8 and S2; non-emergent surgery
- Opioid naive (less than 6 oxycodone/day or 30 mg oxycodone equivalent)
- No contraindication to local anesthetics or regional procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency surgery
- Allergy to study medications
- BMI less than 20 or greater than 50
- Major liver or kidney dysfunction or other pre-existing major organ dysfunction
- Revision surgery
- Opioid tolerant (60 mg morphine equivalents/day for 1 week) or narcotic dependence (opioid intake morphine equivalent greater than10 mg/day for more than 3 months)
- Other sources of chronic pain (e.g. fibromyalgia)
- Patients with associated significant central nervous system (CNS) or respiratory disease (home oxygen use)
- Pre-operative neurological deficits
- Co-existing hematological disorders or deranged coagulation parameters
- Significant psychiatric illnesses that impedes the subject's ability to provide informed consent
- Language barrier
- Vulnerable population (e.g. prisoners)
- Pregnant females
- History of recent myocardial infarction
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rashmi Muellerlead
Study Sites (1)
University of Iowa Health Care Medical Center
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States
Related Publications (26)
Brown CH 4th, LaFlam A, Max L, Wyrobek J, Neufeld KJ, Kebaish KM, Cohen DB, Walston JD, Hogue CW, Riley LH. Delirium After Spine Surgery in Older Adults: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Oct;64(10):2101-2108. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14434. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
PMID: 27696373BACKGROUNDDunne SS, Coffey JC, Konje S, Gasior S, Clancy CC, Gulati G, Meagher D, Dunne CP. Biomarkers in delirium: A systematic review. J Psychosom Res. 2021 Aug;147:110530. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110530. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
PMID: 34098376BACKGROUNDEhrlich GE. Low back pain. Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81(9):671-6. Epub 2003 Nov 14.
PMID: 14710509BACKGROUNDEtzioni DA, Liu JH, O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Ko CY. Elderly patients in surgical workloads: a population-based analysis. Am Surg. 2003 Nov;69(11):961-5.
PMID: 14627256BACKGROUNDFineberg SJ, Nandyala SV, Marquez-Lara A, Oglesby M, Patel AA, Singh K. Incidence and risk factors for postoperative delirium after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Sep 15;38(20):1790-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a0d507.
PMID: 23797502BACKGROUNDForero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUNDHuang X, Wang J, Zhang J, Kang Y, Sandeep B, Yang J. Ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block improves analgesia after laparoscopic hepatectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2022 Sep;129(3):445-453. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.05.013. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
PMID: 35803754BACKGROUNDHughey AB, Lesniak MS, Ansari SA, Roth S. What will anesthesiologists be anesthetizing? Trends in neurosurgical procedure usage. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jun 1;110(6):1686-97. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cbd9cc. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
PMID: 20142356BACKGROUNDInouye SK, Westendorp RG, Saczynski JS. Delirium in elderly people. Lancet. 2014 Mar 8;383(9920):911-22. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60688-1. Epub 2013 Aug 28.
PMID: 23992774BACKGROUNDKendall MC, Alves L, Traill LL, De Oliveira GS. The effect of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block on postsurgical pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 May 1;20(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01016-8.
PMID: 32357842BACKGROUNDKumar CD, Dietz N, Sharma M, Cruz A, Counts CE, Wang D, Ugiliweneza B, Boakye M, Drazin D. Spine Surgery in the Octogenarian Population: A Comparison of Demographics, Surgical Approach, and Healthcare Utilization With the PearlDiver Database. Cureus. 2021 Apr 19;13(4):e14561. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14561.
PMID: 34026377BACKGROUNDLang SAJ, Bohn T, Barleben L, Pumberger M, Roll S, Buttner-Janz K. Advanced meta-analyses comparing the three surgical techniques total disc replacement, anterior stand-alone fusion and circumferential fusion regarding pain, function and complications up to 3 years to treat lumbar degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J. 2021 Dec;30(12):3688-3701. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06784-6. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
PMID: 33837832BACKGROUNDLeslie K, Troedel S, Irwin K, Pearce F, Ugoni A, Gillies R, Pemberton E, Dharmage S. Quality of recovery from anesthesia in neurosurgical patients. Anesthesiology. 2003 Nov;99(5):1158-65. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200311000-00024.
PMID: 14576554BACKGROUNDLi K, Ji C, Luo D, Feng H, Yang K, Xu H. Wound infiltration with ropivacaine as an adjuvant to patient controlled analgesia for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Nov 18;20(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01205-5.
PMID: 33208089BACKGROUNDMa J, Bi Y, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Wu Y, Ye Y, Wang J, Zhang T, Liu B. Erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2021 Nov;30(11):3137-3149. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06853-w. Epub 2021 May 13.
PMID: 33983515BACKGROUNDMukherjee I. Invited commentary on "Effects of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain and side-effects in adult patients underwent surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials". Int J Surg. 2020 Aug;80:35. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.028. Epub 2020 Jun 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 32585193BACKGROUNDNazemi AK, Gowd AK, Carmouche JJ, Kates SL, Albert TJ, Behrend CJ. Prevention and Management of Postoperative Delirium in Elderly Patients Following Elective Spinal Surgery. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Apr;30(3):112-119. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000467.
PMID: 28141603BACKGROUNDPerera AP, Chari A, Kostusiak M, Khan AA, Luoma AM, Casey ATH. Intramuscular Local Anesthetic Infiltration at Closure for Postoperative Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Jul 15;42(14):1088-1095. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001443.
PMID: 28426530BACKGROUNDRizk P, Morris W, Oladeji P, Huo M. Review of Postoperative Delirium in Geriatric Patients Undergoing Hip Surgery. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2016 Jun;7(2):100-5. doi: 10.1177/2151458516641162. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
PMID: 27239384BACKGROUNDRizkalla JM, Holderread B, Awad M, Botros A, Syed IY. The erector spinae plane block for analgesia after lumbar spine surgery: A systematic review. J Orthop. 2021 Feb 18;24:145-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.02.006. eCollection 2021 Mar-Apr.
PMID: 33716419BACKGROUNDRudolph JL, Inouye SK, Jones RN, Yang FM, Fong TG, Levkoff SE, Marcantonio ER. Delirium: an independent predictor of functional decline after cardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Apr;58(4):643-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02762.x. Epub 2010 Mar 22.
PMID: 20345866BACKGROUNDSaadawi M, Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, Leurcharusmee P, Tran Q. Erector spinae plane block: A narrative review with systematic analysis of the evidence pertaining to clinical indications and alternative truncal blocks. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110063. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110063. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
PMID: 33032124BACKGROUNDSoffin EM, Beckman JD, Tseng A, Zhong H, Huang RC, Urban M, Guheen CR, Kim HJ, Cammisa FP, Nejim JA, Schwab FJ, Armendi IF, Memtsoudis SG. Enhanced Recovery after Lumbar Spine Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Assess the Quality of Patient Recovery. Anesthesiology. 2020 Aug;133(2):350-363. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003346.
PMID: 32433277BACKGROUNDSusano MJ, Scheetz SD, Grasfield RH, Cheung D, Xu X, Kang JD, Smith TR, Lu Y, Groff MW, Chi JH, Crosby G, Culley DJ. Retrospective Analysis of Perioperative Variables Associated With Postoperative Delirium and Other Adverse Outcomes in Older Patients After Spine Surgery. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2019 Oct;31(4):385-391. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000566.
PMID: 30531557BACKGROUNDSusano MJ, Grasfield RH, Friese M, Rosner B, Crosby G, Bader AM, Kang JD, Smith TR, Lu Y, Groff MW, Chi JH, Grodstein F, Culley DJ. Brief Preoperative Screening for Frailty and Cognitive Impairment Predicts Delirium after Spine Surgery. Anesthesiology. 2020 Dec 1;133(6):1184-1191. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003523.
PMID: 32898243BACKGROUNDWaelkens P, Alsabbagh E, Sauter A, Joshi GP, Beloeil H; PROSPECT Working group * * of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain therapy (ESRA). Pain management after complex spine surgery: A systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Sep 1;38(9):985-994. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001448.
PMID: 34397527BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rashmi Mueller, MD
University of Iowa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2023
First Posted
January 10, 2024
Study Start
May 15, 2024
Primary Completion
April 29, 2025
Study Completion
April 29, 2025
Last Updated
February 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Individual participant data (IPD) will be available for sharing immediately after publication and ending 5 years following article publication.
- Access Criteria
- Individual participant data (IPD) will be accessible to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, to achieve aims in the approved proposal.
All of the individual participant data collected during the trial, after deidentification will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, to achieve aims in the approved proposal. IPD will be available for sharing immediately after publication and ending 5 years following article publication.