Study Stopped
We were not funded for the project.
The Use of OTSC in LBGDU to Standard Endoscopic Hemostatic Methods
OTSC-LBGDU
The Use of Over-the-scope-clips in Large Bleeding Gastro-duodenal Ulcers; a Randomized Comparison to Standard Endoscopic Hemostatic Methods
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
In managing bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers, endoscopic control of bleeding is the first line treatment-further bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis is associated with a 3-fold increase in mortality. Large ulcer size (\> 20 mm) predicts further bleeding. These ulcers erode into arteries of significant size (\>2 mm) from either the gastro-duodenal or left gastric arterial complexes. An over-the-scope clip is an endoscopic clamp device with a high tensile strength. It can compress sizeable arteries, and firmly anchor onto the ulcer base avoiding recurrent bleeding from clip dislodgement. It therefore offers secure and durable hemostasis. In the proposed randomized controlled trial, the investigators hypothesize that after initial endoscopic control of bleeding from large gastro-duodenal ulcers (20 mm in size or more), adding an OTSC can prevent recurrent bleeding and improve patients' outcomes. Investigators enroll patients with bleeding from large ulcers as defined. After initial endoscopic control of bleeding using injection with diluted epinephrine, these patients are randomized, during endoscopy, to receive standard treatment (thermo-coagulation or hemo-clips) or an added OTSC. The primary endpoint is recurrent bleeding over 30 days confirmed on endoscopy. Secondary endpoints include the need for rescue treatment; endoscopic, angiographic embolization or surgery, red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, hospitalization, and bleeding related and all-cause mortality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Oct 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 26, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2024
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
January 24, 2025
January 1, 2025
1.7 years
December 26, 2023
January 22, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
bleeding free probability in 30 days after randomization
further bleeding defined by the composite of failure to control bleeding after assigned endoscopic treatment and recurrent bleeding.
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (4)
failure to control bleeding with assigned endoscopic treatment and recurrent bleeding after initial hemostasis
30 days
number of participants using angiographic treatment
30 days
number of participants using surgical treatment
30 days
second endoscopic attempts at hemostasis
30 days
Other Outcomes (4)
red cell transfusion
30 days
number of days in the hospital
30 days
number of days in intensive care unit (ICU)
30 days
- +1 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Over-the-scope Clips
EXPERIMENTALEndoscopic Application of Over-the-scope Clips
standard treatment
ACTIVE COMPARATORstandard treatment of either hemo-clipping or thermo-coagulation with or without pre injection with diluted epinephrine \<=20 clips or pulse
Interventions
Over-the-scope Clips is mounted onto a transparent cap, which is attached to the tip of the endoscope. To deploy the claw device, a cogwheel at the scope head is turned pulling a trip string. This in turn retracts the cap releasing the OTSC onto the vessels.
Contact thermocoagulation using a 3.3mm probe, hemo-clips, or both. The use of the bipolar device involves firm mechanical compression and coagulation for about 8 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients admitted with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (melena, hematemesis, or decrease in hemoglobin level with or without hypotension).
- large gastro-duodenal ulcers (20 mm in size or more)
- active bleeding (pulsatile or Forrest Ia bleeding, oozing from a visible vessel, or Forrest Ib bleeding) or a nonbleeding visible vessel (Forrest IIa lesion). Clots overlying bleeding lesions are injected with diluted epinephrine and then irrigated or elevated using a cheese-wiring technique. If a vessel is then unveiled, we can proceed with randomization.
You may not qualify if:
- patients with esophagogastric varices
- pregnant or lactating women
- patients who cannot provide written consent
- moribund from their co-morbid illnesses and are not considered for active treatment.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chinese University of Hong Konglead
- King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospitalcollaborator
- West China Hospitalcollaborator
- Beijing Friendship Hospitalcollaborator
- Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical Universitycollaborator
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang Universitycollaborator
Related Publications (11)
Barkun AN, Almadi M, Kuipers EJ, Laine L, Sung J, Tse F, Leontiadis GI, Abraham NS, Calvet X, Chan FKL, Douketis J, Enns R, Gralnek IM, Jairath V, Jensen D, Lau J, Lip GYH, Loffroy R, Maluf-Filho F, Meltzer AC, Reddy N, Saltzman JR, Marshall JK, Bardou M. Management of Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Guideline Recommendations From the International Consensus Group. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Dec 3;171(11):805-822. doi: 10.7326/M19-1795. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
PMID: 31634917BACKGROUNDHearnshaw SA, Logan RF, Lowe D, Travis SP, Murphy MF, Palmer KR. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, diagnoses and outcomes in the 2007 UK audit. Gut. 2011 Oct;60(10):1327-35. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.228437. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
PMID: 21490373BACKGROUNDSchmidt A, Golder S, Goetz M, Meining A, Lau J, von Delius S, Escher M, Hoffmann A, Wiest R, Messmann H, Kratt T, Walter B, Bettinger D, Caca K. Over-the-Scope Clips Are More Effective Than Standard Endoscopic Therapy for Patients With Recurrent Bleeding of Peptic Ulcers. Gastroenterology. 2018 Sep;155(3):674-686.e6. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.05.037. Epub 2018 May 24.
PMID: 29803838BACKGROUNDJensen DM, Kovacs T, Ghassemi KA, Kaneshiro M, Gornbein J. Randomized Controlled Trial of Over-the-Scope Clip as Initial Treatment of Severe Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Nov;19(11):2315-2323.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.08.046. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
PMID: 32828873BACKGROUNDMeier B, Wannhoff A, Denzer U, Stathopoulos P, Schumacher B, Albers D, Hoffmeister A, Feisthammel J, Walter B, Meining A, Wedi E, Zachaus M, Pickartz T, Kullmer A, Schmidt A, Caca K. Over-the-scope-clips versus standard treatment in high-risk patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomised controlled trial (STING-2). Gut. 2022 Jul;71(7):1251-1258. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-325300. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
PMID: 35321938BACKGROUNDLau JYW, Li R, Tan CH, Sun XJ, Song HJ, Li L, Ji F, Wang BJ, Shi DT, Leung WK, Hartley I, Moss A, Yu KYY, Suen BY, Li P, Chan FKL. Comparison of Over-the-Scope Clips to Standard Endoscopic Treatment as the Initial Treatment in Patients With Bleeding From a Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Cause : A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2023 Apr;176(4):455-462. doi: 10.7326/M22-1783. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
PMID: 36877964BACKGROUNDChan S, Pittayanon R, Wang HP, Chen JH, Teoh AY, Kuo YT, Tang RS, Yip HC, Ng SKK, Wong S, Mak JWY, Chan H, Lau L, Lui RN, Wong M, Rerknimitr R, Ng EK, Chiu PWY. Use of over-the-scope clip (OTSC) versus standard therapy for the prevention of rebleeding in large peptic ulcers (size >/=1.5 cm): an open-labelled, multicentre international randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2023 Apr;72(4):638-643. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327007. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
PMID: 36307177BACKGROUNDElmunzer BJ, Young SD, Inadomi JM, Schoenfeld P, Laine L. Systematic review of the predictors of recurrent hemorrhage after endoscopic hemostatic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct;103(10):2625-32; quiz 2633. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02070.x. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
PMID: 18684171BACKGROUNDVergara M, Bennett C, Calvet X, Gisbert JP. Epinephrine injection versus epinephrine injection and a second endoscopic method in high-risk bleeding ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 13;2014(10):CD005584. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005584.pub3.
PMID: 25308912BACKGROUNDLau JYW, Pittayanon R, Wong KT, Pinjaroen N, Chiu PWY, Rerknimitr R, Holster IL, Kuipers EJ, Wu KC, Au KWL, Chan FKL, Sung JJY. Prophylactic angiographic embolisation after endoscopic control of bleeding to high-risk peptic ulcers: a randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2019 May;68(5):796-803. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316074. Epub 2018 May 25.
PMID: 29802172BACKGROUNDCasagrande JT, Pike MC. An improved approximate formula for calculating sample sizes for comparing two binomial distributions. Biometrics. 1978 Sep;34(3):483-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 719125BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
YUN WONG LAU
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- PROFESSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 26, 2023
First Posted
January 9, 2024
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
January 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share