Argon Plasma Coagulation vs Hemoclipping for Bleeding Peptic Ulcers
Comparison of Hemostatic Efficacy for Argon Plasma Coagulation vs Hemoclipping Following Distilled Water Injection in Treating High-risk Bleeding Ulcers
1 other identifier
interventional
166
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Endoscopic treatment is recommended for initial hemostasis in nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the additional hemostatic efficacy of argon plasma coagulation (APC) has not been widely investigated. We designed a randomized trial comparing APC plus injection therapy vs hemoclipping plus injection therapy for peptic ulcer bleeding.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Feb 2012
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 9, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 25, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 26, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 29, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
October 22, 2020
CompletedDecember 23, 2020
November 1, 2020
4.1 years
April 26, 2020
September 27, 2020
November 29, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants With Rebleeding
Rebleeding was observed for a 30-day study period. One or more the following criteria were considered as evidence of recurrent bleeding: aspiration of fresh blood from a nasogastric or orogastric tube; pulse rate over 100 beats per minute; a drop in systolic blood pressure exceeding 30 mmHg; or continue coffee ground emesis or melena with a decline in hemoglobin of at least 2g/dL.
up to 30 days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Mortality
up to 30 days
Surgery or Arterial Embolization
up to 30 days
Study Arms (2)
Argon plasma coagulation plus distilled water injection
EXPERIMENTALThe patients in this group received Argon plasma coagulation therapy, PSD-60/Endoplasma (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), following distilled water injection at index endoscopy. Then participants were treated with intravenous pantoprazole (Pantoloc i.v., Nycomed GmbH, Singen, Germany) 40 mg every 12 hours during the first 3 days, followed by oral pantoprazole (Pantoloc, Takeda GmbH, Oranienburg, Germany) 40 mg daily until the end of56-day study period.
Hemoclipping plus distilled water injection
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe patients in this group received hemoclipping (Olympus HX 110/610, Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan), following distilled water injection at index endoscopy. Then participants were treated with intravenous pantoprazole (Pantoloc i.v., Nycomed GmbH, Singen, Germany) 40 mg every 12 hours during the first 3 days, followed by oral pantoprazole (Pantoloc, Takeda GmbH, Oranienburg, Germany) 40 mg daily until the end of56-day study period.
Interventions
Olympus electrosurgical unit/argon plasma coagulation unit (PSD-60/Endoplasma, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan)
clipping device (Olympus HX 110/610, Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- . high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding. High-risk bleeding ulcers were defined as participants with stigmata of a bleeding visible vessels (eg, spurting, oozing), a non-bleeding visible vessels (NBVV) or adherent clot.4 A NBVV at endoscopy was defined as a raised red, red-blue or pale hemispheric vessel protruding from the ulcer bed, without active bleeding. An adherent clot was defined as an overlying blood clot that was resistant to vigorous irrigation.
You may not qualify if:
- the presence of another possible bleeding site (eg, gastroesophageal varix, gastric cancer, reflux esophagitis)
- coexistence of actively severe ill diseases (eg, septic shock, stroke, myocardial infarction, surgical abdomen)
- treatment with an anticoagulant (eg, warfarin)
- pregnancy
- the presence of operated stomach
- refusal to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine
Kaohsiung City, 81362, Taiwan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Huay-Min Wang
- Organization
- Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Wen-Chi Chen, MD
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 26, 2020
First Posted
April 29, 2020
Study Start
February 9, 2012
Primary Completion
February 28, 2016
Study Completion
April 25, 2016
Last Updated
December 23, 2020
Results First Posted
October 22, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share