NCT02534571

Brief Summary

Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common medical emergency. Bleeding peptic ulcers and other non-variceal causes constitute to about 95% of all cases of bleeding. Endoscopic treatment stops active bleeding, reduces rate of further bleeding and leads to improved patients outcomes. Endoscopic treatment can be technically demanding especially with lesions in difficult anatomic positions and to endoscopists with less experience. TC-325 is a propriety mineral blend hemostatic powder used to compress external civilian and military traumatic injuries. Investigators reported the first endoscopic application of TC-325 in 20 patients with actively bleeding gastro-duodenal ulcers. Investigators were able to stop bleeding in 19 of them. Subsequent case series from others reported a similar rate in the acute control of bleeding. To further define the role of TC-325 as a mono-therapy, a comparison to the current standard in endoscopic treatment is required. A non-inferiority randomized trial is being proposed to compare endoscopic use of TC-325 as a mono-therapy to current standards (i.e. hemoclips or thermo-coagulation with or without pre-injection with diluted epinephrine) in hemostatic treatment in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding from non-variceal causes. The non-inferiority primary endpoint is control of bleeding over 30 days from randomization. Other outcome endpoints include further endoscopic, angiographic or surgical treatments, hospitalization, blood transfusion and mortality. Investigators also compare ease of therapy measured by procedure time and a 10 cm visual analogue scale rated by endoscopists. Endoscopic application of TC-325 is a simple and less skill dependent technique. It may prove useful in bleeding from anatomically challenging sites of the gastro-duodenal tract.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
224

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2015

Typical duration for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 6, 2015

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 27, 2015

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 7, 2015

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 14, 2019

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

October 11, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

August 6, 2015

Last Update Submit

October 10, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • number of participants who presents and confirmed endoscopically as recurrent upper gastro-intestinal bleeding

    ( Further bleeding is defined by failure to control bleeding at index endoscopy, renewed hematemesis, fresh melena with circulatory instability after initial control of bleeding (systolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or less or pulse rate of 110 per minute or more) and/or a drop in haemoglobin by 2 g/dl and haematocrit by 10% over 24 hours despite adequate transfusion. Further bleeding after initial endoscopic hemostasis requires documentation with immediate endoscopy which finds fresh blood and active bleeding from a previously treated upper GIB source. Patients with further bleeding after initial endoscopic control are considered to have reached an outcome endpoint.

    30 days

Secondary Outcomes (10)

  • number of participants who required subsequent endoscopic treatment upon recurrent bleeding

    30 days

  • number of participants who required subsequent surgical treatment upon recurrent bleeding

    30 days

  • number of participants who required further blood transfusion post randomization

    30 days

  • Days of hospitalization post randomization

    60 days

  • number of days which participant required caring in Intensive care unit post randomization

    60 days

  • +5 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

TC-325

EXPERIMENTAL

Endoscopic Application of a Hemostatic Powder TC-325, \<=150gm , once

Device: Endoscopic Application of a Hemostatic Powder TC-325

standard treatment

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

standard treatment of either hemo-clipping or thermo-coagulation with or without pre injection with diluted epinephrine \<=20 clip or4 pulse , once only

Device: Hemo-clippingDrug: EpinephrineDevice: thermo-coagulation

Interventions

Endoscopic Application of a Hemostatic Powder TC-325 \<=150g once

TC-325

Hemo-clipping \<=20 clips

Also known as: quick clips
standard treatment

epinephrine injection endoscopically \<20 mls

Also known as: adrenaline
standard treatment

contact thermo-coagulation \< = 4 pulses

Also known as: contact thermo-coagulation
standard treatment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients with overt signs of upper gastrointestinal bleeding (hematemesis, melena and/or circulatory instability)
  • documented bleeding (Forrest I) from a non-variceal upper gastrointestinal source (gastro-duodenal ulcers, Mallory Weiss tear, cancers, Dieulafoy's and other vascular lesions) at endoscopy.

You may not qualify if:

  • without a full informed consent from the patient or his next of kin
  • Age \<18 years
  • Pregnant
  • Lactating women

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Endoscopy Centre

Hong Kong, HONG KONG, China

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Lau JYW, Pittayanon R, Kwek A, Tang RS, Chan H, Rerknimitr R, Lee J, Ang TL, Suen BY, Yu YY, Chan FKL, Sung JJY. Comparison of a Hemostatic Powder and Standard Treatment in the Control of Active Bleeding From Upper Nonvariceal Lesions : A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Trial. Ann Intern Med. 2022 Feb;175(2):171-178. doi: 10.7326/M21-0975. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

  • Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, Martel M, Leontiadis GI. ACG Clinical Guideline: Upper Gastrointestinal and Ulcer Bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 May 1;116(5):899-917. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001245.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Epinephrine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EthanolaminesAmino AlcoholsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsAminesBiogenic MonoaminesBiogenic AminesCatecholaminesCatecholsPhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbons

Study Officials

  • JAMES YW LAU, MD

    CUHK

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 6, 2015

First Posted

August 27, 2015

Study Start

September 7, 2015

Primary Completion

January 14, 2019

Study Completion

April 30, 2019

Last Updated

October 11, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations