Widefield Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope Optimized for Pediatric and Neonatal Imaging
WiSLO
2 other identifiers
observational
42
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to test the use of a novel Widefield Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope (WiSLO) Optimized for Pediatric and Neonatal Imaging in pediatric and adult subjects who are undergoing clinical evaluation for eye disease or are healthy adult volunteers. The main questions to answer are:
- Whether WiSLO will be more comfortable and satisfactory in experience for the patient and operator than commercial alternatives.
- If the quality of WiSLO near infrared images will be comparable to color fundus camera imaging across population of different ages and fundus pigmentation. Participants will have the following research procedures:
- Imaging of both eyes with a research noncontact WiSLO
- Imaging of both eyes with a commercially available non-contact hand held fundus camera (Volk Pictor Plus)
- Likert scales for adults
- Pediatric Likert scales for children
- CRIES scales for infants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2026
October 8, 2025
October 1, 2025
10 months
December 11, 2023
October 6, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Presence of microanatomy as measured by WiSLO image reading
Presence (Yes/No) of retinal anatomy as measured from WiSLO and commercial OCT grading
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Presence of abnormal microanatomy as measured by WiSLO image reading
Combination of presence (Yes/No) and severity (e.g., mild, moderate, severe) of abnormal retinal structures as measured from WiSLO images and commercially available fundus images.
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Presence of microanatomy from retinal photo imaging
Presence (Yes/No) of retinal microanatomy from commercially available fundus imaging (Volk Pictor Plus™) and WiSLO images.
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Severity of abnormal microanatomy from retinal photo imaging
Combination of presence (Yes/No) and severity (e.g., mild, moderate, severe) of abnormal retinal structures from commercially available fundus imaging (Volk Pictor Plus™) and WiSLO images.
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Time of image capture from WiSLO and commercially available fundus imaging
Assessment of time of image capture from both WiSLO and commercially available fundus imaging.
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Patient comfort as measured by Likert Scales
Determining subjective patient comfort and satisfaction using age appropriate Likert Scales for adults and minors (Likert scores 1 - 5)
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Patient satisfaction as measured by Likert Scales
Determining subjective patient comfort and satisfaction using age appropriate Likert Scales for adults and minors (Likert scores 1 - 5)
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Patient comfort as measured by CRIES evaluation
Determining subjective patient comfort and satisfaction CRIES evaluation (crying 0-4; facial expression 0-2; heart rate beats per minute; change in respiratory support).
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Patient satisfaction as measured by CRIES evaluation
Determining subjective patient comfort and satisfaction CRIES evaluation (crying 0-4; facial expression 0-2; heart rate beats per minute; change in respiratory support).
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Operator comfort as measured by Likert Scales
Determining subjective operator comfort and satisfaction using Likert Scales (Likert scores 1-5)
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Operator satisfaction as measured by Likert Scales
Determining subjective operator comfort and satisfaction using Likert Scales (Likert scores 1-5)
Standard of care clinic visit - day 1
Study Arms (2)
Adult (≥18 years) cohort
Adults that may or may not have eye pathology
Minor cohort
Infant/child undergoing clinically-indicated examination that may or may not have eye pathology. We will not enroll inpatient pre-term infants or neonates. The youngest age at enrollment will be 30 days adjusted age using the NICH NRN Web-based Adjusted Age Calculator.
Interventions
Imaging with the research WiSLO device in non-contact mode (4 images from each eye)
Imaging with the commercial handheld fundus camera, Volk Pictor Plus™ (4 images from each eye)
Eligibility Criteria
Patients eligible for this research study may have eye conditions requiring clinical evaluation. Participants will be recruited from the patient population of Duke Eye Center. Healthy adult volunteers will be recruited from the patient population of Duke Eye Center, visitors attending clinical visits with Duke Eye Center patients, Duke Employees and Duke Students. No employees or students will be enrolled if under the direct supervision of the PI.
You may qualify if:
- Adults (≥18 years) that may or may not have eye pathology
- Infant/child undergoing clinically-indicated examination that may or may not have eye pathology. NOTE: We will not enroll inpatient pre-term infants or neonates. The youngest age at enrollment will be 30 days adjusted age using the NICH NRN Web-based Adjusted Age Calculator.
- Adults and infant/child with or without prior pupil dilation for clinical eye care visit
- Adult participant is able and willing to consent to study participation
- Parent/Legal Guardian is able and willing to consent to study participation for the minor
- Pediatric participant \>12 years is able and willing to assent to study participation
You may not qualify if:
- Participant or Parent/Legal Guardian unwilling or unable to provide consent
- Participant has a health or eye condition that would preclude eye examination or retinal imaging (e.g. evidence of inflammation or infection of ocular surface or eyelids, or corneal opacity or cataract)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Duke Universitylead
- National Eye Institute (NEI)collaborator
Study Sites (1)
Duke University Eye Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Cynthia A Toth, MD
Duke University Eye Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 11, 2023
First Posted
December 20, 2023
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Last Updated
October 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Final research data will be available for at least the duration of the project.
- Access Criteria
- We will archive final research data from the proposed project and make the underlying datasets available to other researchers upon request.
We are committed to prompt publication of research results as the optimal means for scientific advancement as well as career advancement for our students and trainees. All findings resulting from the proposed studies will be prepared for publication in peer-reviewed journals and posted on PubMed Central once accepted. Further, we are strong advocates of open-access publishing and are supportive of efforts by publishers and professional societies to develop technologies for on-line publishing of entire experimental datasets, although the technology for doing so in biomedical imaging research is still evolving. We have published such datasets using OSA's Interactive Science Publishing technology (http://midas.osa.org/midaspub/item/view/1123) and as supplementary data in OSA journals (https://www.osapublishing.org/submit/style/multimedia.cfm). We plan to either publish datasets from this study or make the datasets available upon request.