NCT02001129

Brief Summary

This study aims to examine the effectiveness of three different ways of helping patients attend their recommended eye care appointments.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2013

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2013

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 26, 2013

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 4, 2013

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2014

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

November 29, 2016

Status Verified

November 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

November 26, 2013

Last Update Submit

November 26, 2016

Conditions

Keywords

Eye care adherencehealth care utilization

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Appointment Adherence

    A research assistant examines the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) system to assess recommended appointment adherence.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Scheduling Appointment

    1 month

Study Arms (3)

Automated Telephone System

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition to a standardized reminder letter, participants also received a telephone call from an automated system to remind them of a recommended follow-up appointment.

Behavioral: Personalized Telephone CallBehavioral: Usual Care

Personalized Telephone Call

EXPERIMENTAL

In addition to the usual care letter, a staff member called participants one month prior of recommended follow-up appointment. During this call, participants were given the option to schedule an appointment.

Behavioral: Automated Telephone SystemBehavioral: Usual Care

Usual Care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to this arm receive a "usual care" letter which is a standard reminder letter from the primary eye care office. This is usual practice in many primary eye care facilities.

Behavioral: Usual Care

Interventions

Participants receive automated reminder phone calls.

Also known as: Patient appointment message 2000
Personalized Telephone Call

Participants receive reminder phone calls by study staff.

Also known as: Study staff phone call
Automated Telephone System
Usual CareBEHAVIORAL

Participants receive a standard reminder letter in the mail.

Also known as: Reminder letter sent in the mail.
Automated Telephone SystemPersonalized Telephone CallUsual Care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: Over 18 years
  • Primary Eye Care Patients who were recommended for a 6-month, 12-month, or 24-month follow-up appointment during September 2013 through November 2013.
  • Access to a telephone

You may not qualify if:

  • Does not speak English

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Wills Eye Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Callinan CE, Kenney B, Hark LA, Murchison AP, Dai Y, Leiby BE, Mayro EL, Bilson J, Haller JA. Improving Follow-Up Adherence in a Primary Eye Care Setting. Am J Med Qual. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):73-79. doi: 10.1177/1062860615616860. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

    PMID: 26656245BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Eye DiseasesPatient Acceptance of Health Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Treatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Lisa Hark, PhD

    Wills Eye

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Ophthalmologist-in-Chief

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 26, 2013

First Posted

December 4, 2013

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion

February 1, 2014

Study Completion

August 1, 2014

Last Updated

November 29, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations