Peri-implant Phenotype, Calprotectin and Mmp-8 Levels in Cases Diagnosed With Peri-implant Disease
The Effect of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Phenotype on the Severity of Peri-Implant Diseases and the Outcomes of Non-Surgical Mechanical Treatment
1 other identifier
interventional
39
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Following the implantation procedures; The peri-implant mucosa may begin to show signs of inflammation depending on the patient (bruxism, lack of oral hygiene) or other factors (planning errors, iatrogenic factors). These signs of inflammation may remain limited to soft tissue or may progress to bone depending on the host response. Another relevant factor in such cases is peri-implant mucosa thickness. Our study aims to investigate the effect of peri-implant soft tissue thickness on the degree of peri-implant disease and the contribution of soft tissue augmentation procedures applied with subepithelial connective tissue graft and non-surgical mechanical treatment results, accompanied by clinical and biochemical parameters.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 21, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 22, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 22, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 18, 2023
CompletedDecember 18, 2023
December 1, 2023
1.6 years
November 24, 2023
December 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (14)
Probing Depth(PD)
The depth of the peri-implant pocket or groove was measured with a plastic probe (KERR- Hawe Caliber Plastic Periodontal Probe, Switzerland) from 4 regions of the peri-implant mucosa: mesial, distal, lingual/palatinal and buccal. No extra force was applied to the plastic probe during measurement. The probe placed in the pocket was held parallel to the abutment with a force equal to its own weight (approximately 0.25 N). At the point where resistance is felt at the bottom of the pocket without losing contact with the implant surface; The value corresponding to the margin was recorded on the plastic probe (KERR- Hawe Caliber Plastic Periodontal Probe, Switzerland). All measurement values were collected and averaged, and the average probing depth of the relevant implant was determined.
Immediately before procedure
Probing Depth(PD)
The depth of the peri-implant pocket or groove was measured with a plastic probe (KERR- Hawe Caliber Plastic Periodontal Probe, Switzerland) from 4 regions of the peri-implant mucosa: mesial, distal, lingual/palatinal and buccal. No extra force was applied to the plastic probe during measurement. The probe placed in the pocket was held parallel to the abutment with a force equal to its own weight (approximately 0.25 N). At the point where resistance is felt at the bottom of the pocket without losing contact with the implant surface; The value corresponding to the margin was recorded on the plastic probe (KERR- Hawe Caliber Plastic Periodontal Probe, Switzerland). All measurement values were collected and averaged, and the average probing depth of the relevant implant was determined.
After 6 months procedure
Gingival Index (GI)
The plastic probe (KERR- Hawe Caliber Plastic Periodontal Probe, Switzerland) is placed in the groove or pocket without pressure. bleeding from 4 regions (mesial, distal, lingual/palatinal and buccal) scoring was done. The gingival index score for the relevant implant is the total value Obtained by taking the average. Gingival index, inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa is one of the important indicators.
Immediately before procedure
Gingival Index (GI)
The plastic probe (KERR- Hawe Caliber Plastic Periodontal Probe, Switzerland) is placed in the groove or pocket without pressure. bleeding from 4 regions (mesial, distal, lingual/palatinal and buccal) scoring was done. The gingival index score for the relevant implant is the total value Obtained by taking the average. Gingival index, inflammation in the peri-implant mucosa is one of the important indicators.
After 6 months procedure
Plaque Index(PI)
The area around the abutment to be measured was isolated with cotton pads and gently dried with air-water spray. Plaque was collected from around the groove or pocket with the help of a plastic probe (KERR- Hawe Caliber Plastic Periodontal Probe, Switzerland).
Immediately before procedure
Plaque Index(PI)
The area around the abutment to be measured was isolated with cotton pads and gently dried with air-water spray. Plaque was collected from around the groove or pocket with the help of a plastic probe (KERR- Hawe Caliber Plastic Periodontal Probe, Switzerland).
After 6 months procedure
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
The bleeding on probing score is the gold standard for detecting peri-implant diseases. If bleeding occurs after the probe is placed in the pocket, it is scored as positive (+), otherwise it is scored as negative (-).
Immediately before procedure
Bleeding on Probing (BOP)
The bleeding on probing score is the gold standard for detecting peri-implant diseases. If bleeding occurs after the probe is placed in the pocket, it is scored as positive (+), otherwise it is scored as negative (-).
After 6 months procedure
Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
CAL; It is defined as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) on tooth surfaces to the apical of the pocket base. In the presence of gingival recession; The gingival margin migrates apical to the CEJ. In this case, CAL; length of gingival recession and probing It is calculated as the sum of the depth.
Immediately before procedure
Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
CAL; It is defined as the distance from the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) on tooth surfaces to the apical of the pocket base. In the presence of gingival recession; The gingival margin migrates apical to the CEJ. In this case, CAL; length of gingival recession and probing It is calculated as the sum of the depth.
After 6 months procedure
Calprotectin (CAL)
PICFs collected from the peri-implant margin with paper strips are analyzed by ELISA method. In this method, the amount of CLP, a degradation protein, is calculated. CLP is an antimicrobial protein and inflammation marker.
Immediate before procedure
Calprotectin (CAL)
PICFs collected from the peri-implant margin with paper strips are analyzed by ELISA method. In this method, the amount of CLP, a degradation protein, is calculated. CLP is an antimicrobial protein and inflammation marker.
After 6 months procedure
Matrix Metalloproteinaz-8(MMP-8)
PICFs collected from the peri-implant margin with paper strips are analyzed by ELISA method. MMP-8 is currently used in the prediction, diagnosis, treatment prognosis and treatment of periodontal disease. It is considered one of the main biomarkers used for classification. On the other hand, effective periodontal treatment and MMP inhibitor adjuvant drugs are effective in the progression of periodontal disease by reducing the MMP-8 level in GCF (gingival crevicular fluid) and saliva. It has been shown to have inhibitory effects. Collagenase, which also plays a role in inflammation of peri-implant connective tissue, and gelatinases, with high levels of MMP-8 in peri-implant crevice fluid. has been associated. Low MMP-8 level was determined to indicate peri-implant health, while high regulation of MMP 8 showed inflammation.
Immediate before procedure
Matrix Metalloproteinaz-8(MMP-8)
PICFs collected from the peri-implant margin with paper strips are analyzed by ELISA method. MMP-8 is currently used in the prediction, diagnosis, treatment prognosis and treatment of periodontal disease. It is considered one of the main biomarkers used for classification. On the other hand, effective periodontal treatment and MMP inhibitor adjuvant drugs are effective in the progression of periodontal disease by reducing the MMP-8 level in GCF (gingival crevicular fluid) and saliva. It has been shown to have inhibitory effects. Collagenase, which also plays a role in inflammation of peri-implant connective tissue, and gelatinases, with high levels of MMP-8 in peri-implant crevice fluid. has been associated. Low MMP-8 level was determined to indicate peri-implant health, while high regulation of MMP 8 showed inflammation.
After 6 months procedure
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Peri-implant phenotype
Before non-surgical mechanical treatment
Study Arms (2)
Peri-implant mucositis
ACTIVE COMPARATORIt is defined as widespread inflammatory disease of the soft tissue surrounding endosseous implants without loss of crestal bone or marginal bone. Peri-implant mucositis is diagnosed by pain, swelling, redness and bleeding on probing in the soft tissue around the dental implant. Diagnosis will be completed based on radiographic and clinical findings at the first encounter with the patient. In the second session, PICF (peri-implant crevicular fluid) will be collected from both groups of implants and phenotype evaluations will be made. Following the recording of clinical parameters (PD, GI, PI, CAL, BOP), non-surgical mechanical treatment will be applied to both groups.
Peri-implantitis
ACTIVE COMPARATORPeri-implantitis is a pathology that occurs in the tissues around dental implants, characterized by inflammation of the peri-implant mucosa and destruction of marginal and crestal bone. Clinical diagnosis is defined by the presence of bleeding on probing, the presence of pathological pockets, exudate, swelling, edema, and hyperemia, while findings of bone loss are supported by radiography. Diagnosis will be completed based on radiographic and clinical findings at the first encounter with the patient. In the second session, PICF (peri-implant crevicular fluid) will be collected from both groups of implants and phenotype evaluations will be made. Following the recording of clinical parameters (PD, GI, PI, CAL, BOP), non-surgical mechanical treatment will be applied to both groups.
Interventions
Nonsurgical mechanical therapy (NSMT) aims to control infection and minimize bacterial burden through debridement of the implant surface. It is the gold standard treatment method for both peri-implantitis and peri-implant mucositis. Non-surgical mechanical treatment will be applied to patients with the purpose of surface debridement and reducing bacterial flora in implants with peri-implant disease for which clinical examination has been completed and the diagnosis has been confirmed. All intraoral implants of the patients will be evaluated and all implants that do not meet the clinical definition of health will be intervened. Each implant surface will be treated with a titanium curette. In all groups, mechanical debridement was performed on the surfaces by the same clinician. The procedure will continue gently until it is felt that it has been adequately debrided. Subgingival irrigation will be performed with physiological saline. Post NSMT No medication will be administered.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Systemically healthy,
- Non-smoker,
- There is no drug allergy and no advanced surgical techniques are required.
- volunteers, aged 18-65, who applied to the Department of Periodontics with complaints of infection around the implant or were referred to our clinic, will be included.
You may not qualify if:
- Any drug allergy,
- Pregnant or breastfeeding,
- smoker
- Having a systemic disability,
- Peri-implant disease requiring advanced surgical techniques for treatment
- Individuals who are not volunteers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Beliz Önderlead
Study Sites (1)
Van Yüzüncü Yıl Unıversity
Van, 65080, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (1)
Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, Avila-Ortiz G, Blanco J, Camargo PM, Chen S, Cochran D, Derks J, Figuero E, Hammerle CHF, Heitz-Mayfield LJA, Huynh-Ba G, Iacono V, Koo KT, Lambert F, McCauley L, Quirynen M, Renvert S, Salvi GE, Schwarz F, Tarnow D, Tomasi C, Wang HL, Zitzmann N. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Periodontol. 2018 Jun;89 Suppl 1:S313-S318. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0739.
PMID: 29926955BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 24, 2023
First Posted
December 18, 2023
Study Start
August 21, 2020
Primary Completion
March 22, 2022
Study Completion
March 22, 2022
Last Updated
December 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
It will be shared during the publication phase.