NCT04042194

Brief Summary

The present study aimed to increase the thickness of the gingiva and prevent possible crestal bone resorption by placing the CTG or T-PRF membrane under the mucosa immediately after the implant treatment in individuals with thin gingival phenotype. The null hypothesis was that T-PRF used simultaneously with implant placement can be considered an alternative to CTG.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2018

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 1, 2018

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2019

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2019

Completed
29 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 30, 2019

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 1, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

August 1, 2019

Status Verified

July 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

9 months

First QC Date

July 30, 2019

Last Update Submit

July 31, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

clinical researchImplantImplantologyProspectiveRandomized controlled trialSoft Tissue GraftingSingle-Tooth Implants

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Peri-implant Soft Tissue Thickness

    The measurement of soft tissue thickness at three points: occlusal part of the alveolar crest (OAC), midbuccal mucosa level (MBML), over 1 mm of mucogingival junction (MGJ1)\]

    Change from baseline soft tissue thickness at 3 months

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Keratinised Tissue Width (KTW)

    Change from baseline keratinised tissue width at 3 months

Study Arms (2)

Thickened with T-PRF

EXPERIMENTAL

Following local anaesthesia, the measurement of soft tissue thickness at three points \[1) occlusal part of the alveolar crest (OAC), 2) midbuccal mucosa level (MBML), 3) over 1 mm of mucogingival junction (MGJ1)\] was performed with an endodontic spreader and digital caliber. Following the mid-crestal incision, the buccal flap was raised with double layer technique, while the lingual flap was left to enable direct visibility. The implant bed was drilled according to the manufacturer's protocol. The implants (BEGO Semados® RS/RSX implant system, Bremen, Germany) were placed at the bony crest. Right after the implant placement, the randomisation procedure was performed. In this group, the implants were placed in thin tissues, and T-PRF was inserted in the prepared mucoperiosteal flap at the facial site and secured with horizontal mattresses.

Procedure: Placement of Implants and Thickening Peri-Implant Mucosa with T-PRF

Thickened with CTG

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Following local anaesthesia, the measurement of soft tissue thickness at three points \[1) occlusal part of the alveolar crest (OAC), 2) midbuccal mucosa level (MBML), 3) over 1 mm of mucogingival junction (MGJ1)\] was performed with an endodontic spreader and digital caliber. Following the mid-crestal incision, the buccal flap was raised with double layer technique, while the lingual flap was left to enable direct visibility. The implant bed was drilled according to the manufacturer's protocol. The implants (BEGO Semados® RS/RSX implant system, Bremen, Germany) were placed at the bony crest. Right after the implant placement, the randomisation procedure was performed. In this group, the implants were placed in thin tissues, and CTG was inserted in the prepared mucoperiosteal flap at the facial site and secured with horizontal mattresses.

Procedure: Placement of Implants and Thickening Peri-Implant Mucosa with CTG

Interventions

A total of 40 ml blood sample was collected from the antecubital vein of the patients' right or left arms with 10 ml injectors. 40 ml blood was transferred to a grade-IV titanium tube for the T-PRF group. The titanium tubes containing the blood samples were instantly centrifuged in a tabletop centrifuge at room temperature. The blood samples of the T-PRF group were centrifuged clockwise at 2700 RPM for 20 minutes. Subsequent to the centrifugation process, the clots of the T-PRF group were removed from the tubes with sterile tweezers, separated from the RBC base with scissors, and left for over 20 minutes on sterile woven gauze to release the serum slowly from the collected clots. The implants were placed in thin tissues, and the thickness of the thin tissues was simultaneously increased with T-PRF.

Thickened with T-PRF

The implants were placed in thin tissues, and the thickness of the thin tissues was simultaneously increased with CTG. Autogenous connective tissue graft was harvested according to a single incision technique.

Thickened with CTG

Eligibility Criteria

Age29 Years - 49 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • patients older than 18 years,
  • thin gingiva biotype,
  • one missing tooth in the incisor, canine and premolar area and presence of two natural adjacent teeth
  • no bone increasing procedures prior to and during dental implant,

You may not qualify if:

  • history of a bleeding disorder or on anticoagulant therapy,
  • immunocompromised state and debilitating disease,
  • smoking and alcoholism,
  • poor oral hygiene,
  • diabetes.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Bolu Abant Izzet Baysal University

Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peri-Implantitis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Periodontal DiseasesMouth DiseasesStomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Gülbahar Ustaoğlu

    Abant Izzet Baysal University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2019

First Posted

August 1, 2019

Study Start

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion

April 1, 2019

Study Completion

July 1, 2019

Last Updated

August 1, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations