CORE-COMPARE Pilot Study
Ultra-High Resolution Computed Tomography (CT) vs. Conventional CT for Detecting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) The CORE-COMPARE Pilot Study
1 other identifier
interventional
140
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The utility of Ultra High-Resolution Computed Tomography (UHR-CT) compared to conventional CT in all-comers (i.e., a generally lower-risk population) remains uncertain but is an important area of study in order to justify wider spread implementation and use of this technology, particularly in light of reports of significantly higher radiation exposure with UHR-CT, as well as longer scan times. The availability of technology to reconstruct conventional resolution (CR) simulation images from the raw CT acquisition data acquired on the UHR-CT scanner offers a unique platform to study this question without subjecting individuals to two different scans. The primary objective of this study is to generate preliminary data in support of the hypothesis that noninvasive UHR-CT is superior to conventional resolution CT for identifying patients with obstructive CHD.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 5, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
5.7 years
March 24, 2021
April 8, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
agreement between the number of patients with >70% stenosis detected by ultra-high-resolution tomography compared to conventional tomography, with catheterization considered as the gold standard.
The ultra-high-resolution CT images (UHRCT) and the reconstructed conventional CT resolution images (CRCT) will be independently reviewed by two observers (with a 60-day washout period between both images). The stenoses will be classified according to the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT) classification system (\<25%, 25-49%, 50-69%, 70-99%, and occluded). Patients with stenosis greater than 70% will be flagged. The primary outcome will be assessed for patients that underwent a clinically indicated invasive angiography (ICA). To compare agreement between UHRCT and CRCT studies while using ICA as the gold-standard, a concordance meta-analysis will be employed. This involves evaluating the agreement measures from each study, standardizing the results, and then comparing the concordance results of the two studies with the third study, considered the gold standard.
Up to 24 Months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Segment-Based Analysis for Obstructive Stenosis:
Up to 24 Months
Diagnostic Confidence Assessment:
Up to 24 Months
Interobserver Variability Analysis:
Up to 24 Months
Assessment of vascular and plaque metrics:
Up to 24 Months
Pericoronary Adipose Tissue Analysis:
Up to 24 Months
Study Arms (2)
UHR-CT (Ultra-High-Resolution Computed Tomography-Aquilion Precision)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm undergo CT scans using the Ultra-High-Resolution CT imaging modality.
CR-CT (Conventional Resolution Computed Tomography)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants in this arm receive CT scans using the Conventional Resolution CT imaging modality.
Interventions
Ultra-High Resolution CT (UHR CT) capable of resolving anatomy as small as 150 microns, providing CT image quality with resolution typically seen only in cath labs. The UHR detector is newly designed to provide more than twice the resolution when compared with today's CT technology, with an all-new detector as well as tube, gantry and reconstruction technologies.
Conventional reconstruction Computed Tomography (CT) represents a pivotal approach in medical imaging.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 21-85 years
- Clinical history suggestive of CHD who are referred by their primary cardiologist for further evaluation via Computed tomography angiography (CTA) will be asked to participate.
- Women of child bearing potential must demonstrate a negative pregnancy test within 24 hours of the study CTA.
- Ability to understand and willingness to sign the Informed Consent Form.
You may not qualify if:
- Known allergy to iodinated contrast media.
- History of multiple myeloma or previous organ transplantation
- Elevated serum creatinine (\> 1.5mg/dl) OR calculated creatinine clearance of \< 60 ml/min (using the Cockcroft-Gault formula
- Atrial fibrillation or uncontrolled tachyarrhythmia, or advanced atrioventricular block (second or third degree heart block)
- Evidence of severe symptomatic heart failure (NYHA Class III or IV);
- Known or suspected moderate or severe aortic stenosis
- History of prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in one or more vessel or history of coronary arterial bypass grafting (CABG)
- Suspected acute coronary syndrome
- Presence of any other history or condition that the investigator feels would be problematic
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johns Hopkins Universitylead
- Canon Medical Systems, USAcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Joao Lima, Professor
MD
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2021
First Posted
December 14, 2023
Study Start
April 5, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- Data requests can be submitted starting 12 months after article publication. Data will be made accessible up to 24 months with extensions considered as needed.
- Access Criteria
- Access provided upon request.