Effects of Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Neck and Low Back Pain
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (pPNS) is a physical therapy technique, whose main objective is to treat neuro-musculo-skeletal signs and symptoms by applying a current to a peripheric nerve with a blunt dry needle. Despite its clinical use being already stablished, its use in pathologic subjects is still unknown and, thus, so is its optimal parameterization. The present study proposes to perform two different protocols of peripheral nerve stimulation on neck and low back pain subjects to answer those questions and compared it towards a control group receiving a standard intervention.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 23, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 22, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 5, 2024
CompletedApril 25, 2024
April 1, 2024
2 months
November 23, 2023
April 24, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain
The subject will verbally report the pain intensity suffered along the last week according to the Numeric rate scale (NRS): 0 will be any pain and 10 will be the maximal perception of pain.
Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Demographic questionnaire
Pre-intervention
Change in pain
Pre-intervention and one week after the intervention
Change in pain evoked with movement
Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Change in maximum strength during muscle contraction with dynamometer
Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
Change in surface electromyography signal during muscle contraction
Pre-intervention and immediately after the intervention
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Sensory Threshold, Burst High Frequency
EXPERIMENTALThe technique consists of percutaneous peripheral electrical stimulation on the Spinal or Inferior Gluteal and Tibial Nerve through a ultrasound-guided needle.
Theta-Burst Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALThe technique consists of percutaneous peripheral electrical stimulation on the Spinal or Inferior Gluteal and Tibial Nerve through a ultrasound-guided needle.
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe technique consists of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on the trapezius or low back and internal calf muscles through surface electrodes.
Interventions
The ultrasound guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation will be applied to the Spinal or Inferior Gluteal and Tibial Nerve. The parameters will be 5 trains of 5 seconds, 55 seconds apart, at a frequency of 100Hz, making 5 minutes of total treatment. The intensity will be set 200 microamperes (μA) above the detection threshold for each patient, guaranteeing a sensitive but not painful perception.
The ultrasound guided percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation will be applied to the Spinal or Inferior Gluteal and Tibial Nerve. The parameters will be 40 trains separated by 7 seconds from each other, where each train contains 5 trains separated by 200ms, at a frequency of 5Hz, resulting in 6 minutes and 45 seconds of total treatment. The intensity will be set at the motor threshold of the patient, ensuring a non-painful stimulation.
The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation will be applied on the trapezius or low back and internal calf muscles at a frequency of 80Hz and a pulse width of 250 microseconds, for 15 minutes. The intensity will be set at the detection threshold of each patient generating a sensitive but non-painful perception.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults (+18 years)
- Patients with non-specific/mechanical/articular neck pain.
- Patients with non-specific/mechanical/articular low back pain and/or low back pain accompanied by radicular symptomatology or sciatica.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy.
- Severe illnesses: diabetes, cancer, neurological diseases, depression, etc...
- Balanophora (needle phobia).
- Professional athlete.
- Other concomitant physiotherapy treatment for this pathology.
- Patients with neck or low back pain associated with severe bone damage such as fractures or vertebral fissures.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ionclinics & DEIONICS
Valencia, Spain
Related Publications (34)
Abejon D, Perez-Cajaraville J. Peripheral nerve stimulation: definition. Prog Neurol Surg. 2011;24:203-209. doi: 10.1159/000323052. Epub 2011 Mar 21.
PMID: 21422790BACKGROUNDBear MF, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity: LTP and LTD. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994 Jun;4(3):389-99. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(94)90101-5.
PMID: 7919934BACKGROUNDBevan S. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015 Jun;29(3):356-73. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
PMID: 26612235BACKGROUNDBorghouts JAJ, Koes BW, Bouter LM. The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review. Pain. 1998 Jul;77(1):1-13. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00058-X.
PMID: 9755013BACKGROUNDCorp N, Mansell G, Stynes S, Wynne-Jones G, Morso L, Hill JC, van der Windt DA. Evidence-based treatment recommendations for neck and low back pain across Europe: A systematic review of guidelines. Eur J Pain. 2021 Feb;25(2):275-295. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1679. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
PMID: 33064878BACKGROUNDDelgado Conforme, W. A., Abarca López, J. J., Boada Rodríguez, L. E., & Salazar Trujillo, S. E. (2019). Lumbalgia inespecífica. Dolencia más común de lo que se cree. RECIMUNDO, 3(2), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/3.(2).abril.2019.3-25
BACKGROUNDGhoname EA, Craig WF, White PF, Ahmed HE, Hamza MA, Henderson BN, Gajraj NM, Huber PJ, Gatchel RJ. Percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for low back pain: a randomized crossover study. JAMA. 1999 Mar 3;281(9):818-23. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.9.818.
PMID: 10071003BACKGROUNDGutierrez-Muto AM, Castilla J, Freire M, Oliviero A, Tornero J. Theta burst stimulation: Technical aspects about TMS devices. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):562-564. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 9. No abstract available.
PMID: 32289677BACKGROUNDHjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S; European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC). Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jun;41(6):1073-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016.
PMID: 21621130BACKGROUNDHjornevik T, Jacobsen LM, Qu H, Bjaalie JG, Gjerstad J, Willoch F. Metabolic plasticity in the supraspinal pain modulating circuitry after noxious stimulus-induced spinal cord LTP. Pain. 2008 Dec;140(3):456-464. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.09.029. Epub 2008 Nov 11.
PMID: 19004552BACKGROUNDHuang Y, Chen SR, Chen H, Zhou JJ, Jin D, Pan HL. Theta-Burst Stimulation of Primary Afferents Drives Long-Term Potentiation in the Spinal Cord and Persistent Pain via alpha2delta-1-Bound NMDA Receptors. J Neurosci. 2022 Jan 19;42(3):513-527. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1968-21.2021. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
PMID: 34880118BACKGROUNDJauregui JJ, Cherian JJ, Gwam CU, Chughtai M, Mistry JB, Elmallah RK, Harwin SF, Bhave A, Mont MA. A Meta-Analysis of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain. Surg Technol Int. 2016 Apr;28:296-302.
PMID: 27042787BACKGROUNDJimenez S, Mordillo-Mateos L, Dileone M, Campolo M, Carrasco-Lopez C, Moitinho-Ferreira F, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Siebner HR, Valls-Sole J, Aguilar J, Oliviero A. Effects of patterned peripheral nerve stimulation on soleus spinal motor neuron excitability. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 16;13(2):e0192471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192471. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29451889BACKGROUNDJohnson MI, Paley CA, Jones G, Mulvey MR, Wittkopf PG. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study). BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 10;12(2):e051073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051073.
PMID: 35144946BACKGROUNDKazeminasab S, Nejadghaderi SA, Amiri P, Pourfathi H, Araj-Khodaei M, Sullman MJM, Kolahi AA, Safiri S. Neck pain: global epidemiology, trends and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04957-4.
PMID: 34980079BACKGROUNDKnezevic NN, Candido KD, Vlaeyen JWS, Van Zundert J, Cohen SP. Low back pain. Lancet. 2021 Jul 3;398(10294):78-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00733-9. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
PMID: 34115979BACKGROUNDLall MP, Restrepo E. The Biopsychosocial Model of Low Back Pain and Patient-Centered Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion. Orthop Nurs. 2017 May/Jun;36(3):213-221. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000350.
PMID: 28538537BACKGROUNDLarson J, Munkacsy E. Theta-burst LTP. Brain Res. 2015 Sep 24;1621:38-50. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.034. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
PMID: 25452022BACKGROUNDLarson J, Wong D, Lynch G. Patterned stimulation at the theta frequency is optimal for the induction of hippocampal long-term potentiation. Brain Res. 1986 Mar 19;368(2):347-50. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(86)90579-2.
PMID: 3697730BACKGROUNDLin T, Gargya A, Singh H, Sivanesan E, Gulati A. Mechanism of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in Chronic Pain. Pain Med. 2020 Aug 1;21(Suppl 1):S6-S12. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa164.
PMID: 32804230BACKGROUNDLuo C, Kuner T, Kuner R. Synaptic plasticity in pathological pain. Trends Neurosci. 2014 Jun;37(6):343-55. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 May 12.
PMID: 24833289BACKGROUNDMaffiuletti NA, Aagaard P, Blazevich AJ, Folland J, Tillin N, Duchateau J. Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2016 Jun;116(6):1091-116. doi: 10.1007/s00421-016-3346-6. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
PMID: 26941023BACKGROUNDMartimbianco ALC, Porfirio GJ, Pacheco RL, Torloni MR, Riera R. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 12;12(12):CD011927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011927.pub2.
PMID: 31830313BACKGROUNDPlaza-Manzano G, Gomez-Chiguano GF, Cleland JA, Arias-Buria JL, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Navarro-Santana MJ. Effectiveness of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2020 Jul;24(6):1023-1044. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1559. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
PMID: 32171035BACKGROUNDPopescu A, Lee H. Neck Pain and Lower Back Pain. Med Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;104(2):279-292. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
PMID: 32035569BACKGROUNDRampazo EP, Martignago CCS, de Noronha M, Liebano RE. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation in neck pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Pain. 2022 Jan;26(1):18-42. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1845. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
PMID: 34288255BACKGROUNDRanck JB Jr. Studies on single neurons in dorsal hippocampal formation and septum in unrestrained rats. I. Behavioral correlates and firing repertoires. Exp Neurol. 1973 Nov;41(2):461-531. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(73)90290-2. No abstract available.
PMID: 4355646BACKGROUNDRudell AP, Fox SE, Ranck JB Jr. Hippocampal excitability phase-locked to the theta rhythm in walking rats. Exp Neurol. 1980 Apr;68(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/0014-4886(80)90068-0. No abstract available.
PMID: 7363990BACKGROUNDSvendsen F, Tjolsen A, Hole K. LTP of spinal A beta and C-fibre evoked responses after electrical sciatic nerve stimulation. Neuroreport. 1997 Nov 10;8(16):3427-30. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199711100-00002.
PMID: 9427300BACKGROUNDVan Breukelen GJ. ANCOVA versus change from baseline: more power in randomized studies, more bias in nonrandomized studies [corrected]. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Sep;59(9):920-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.02.007. Epub 2006 Jun 23.
PMID: 16895814BACKGROUNDWall PD, Sweet WH. Temporary abolition of pain in man. Science. 1967 Jan 6;155(3758):108-9. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3758.108.
PMID: 6015561BACKGROUNDWu J, Hu Q, Huang D, Chen X, Chen J. Effect of electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve on synaptic plasticity of spinal dorsal horn and spinal c-fos expression in neonatal, juvenile and adult rats. Brain Res. 2012 Apr 11;1448:11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.002. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
PMID: 22377455BACKGROUNDYang F, Guo J, Sun WL, Liu FY, Cai J, Xing GG, Wan Y. The induction of long-term potentiation in spinal dorsal horn after peripheral nociceptive stimulation and contribution of spinal TRPV1 in rats. Neuroscience. 2014 Jun 6;269:59-66. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.03.037. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
PMID: 24680883BACKGROUNDOrtega FJ, Giner MJ, Perez-Cervera L, Tomas E, Valdesuso R, Navarro I, Delicado-Miralles M, Velasco E. Plasticity-Inducing Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Treating Neck Pain: A Blinded, Randomised Clinical Trial. Eur J Pain. 2026 Jan;30(1):e70207. doi: 10.1002/ejp.70207.
PMID: 41555668DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Enrique Velasco Serna, PhD
VIB-KULeuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The order of the interventions will be randomized by a third person not involved in the treatment, assessment or statistical analysis. Once the care provider has inserted the needle in each subject, another third person will choose the protocol assigned on the stimulator, previously programmed and codified. Another investigator will take measurements of the variables of interest. Thus, nobody (participant, care provider, investigator and the outcome assessor) will know what intervention is applied.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 23, 2023
First Posted
December 1, 2023
Study Start
December 22, 2023
Primary Completion
February 5, 2024
Study Completion
February 5, 2024
Last Updated
April 25, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04