Study to Demonstrate That Muscle Pattern Recognition (MPR) is an Effective Evaluation Tool for Musculoskeletal Neck or Back Pain
Multi-Center, Multi-National Study to Demonstrate That Muscle Pattern Recognition is a Reliable and Valid Evaluation Tool for Patients Who Present With Acute, Sub-Acute, or Chronic Symptoms of Neck or Back Pain of a Musculoskeletal Origin
1 other identifier
interventional
480
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that non able-bodied participants with reported acute, sub-acute, or chronic symptoms of neck or back pain of a musculoskeletal origin will have magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray and blood parameters that do not demonstrate a statistical difference between "normal" (able-bodied) volunteers. Muscle pattern recognition (MPR) testing will show statistically different results between these groups. This statistically significant finding in MPR results will enhance a clinician's determination of clinical normality or abnormality. If this hypothesis is demonstrated, the MPR modality will be the first quantitative tool developed for assisting in the diagnosis of the presence or absence of a musculoskeletal dysfunction in a patient population. The availability of such an evaluation tool to a healthcare provider for patients with soft tissue, non-surgical neck or back complaints will substantially improve the accuracy of diagnosis and case management decisions.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2005
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2005
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2005
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 24, 2005
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2006
CompletedOctober 26, 2005
August 1, 2005
August 22, 2005
October 25, 2005
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
This study will demonstrate differences in muscle recruitment patterns between individuals who are "normal" (asymptomatic, able-bodied) from those individuals ("not normal") with underlying biomechanical dysfunction of the neck and back
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals may participate in this study if they meet the following criteria:
- years of age; male or female.
- foot 10 inches to 6 foot 5 inches in height
- No prior back or neck surgery, or structural deformity of the spine
- No orthopedic injury/illness/surgery limiting range of motion of the shoulders
- No ongoing treatments for back or neck pain/injury from a health professional in the last two years.
- No prior loss of work time due to a neck or back injury/illness
- Laboratory studies: complete blood count (CBC); sedimentation rate; creatinine phosphokinase (CPK); calcium; phosphorus; pregnancy test if female; and drug screen. Laboratory studies will be examined by a physician investigator to determine if the findings will exclude the participant from participating successfully in study activities. A positive pregnancy test or drug screen will automatically exclude the participant from the study.
- Clinical examination of the neck and back by two physicians in agreement that the participant may participate in the study.
- Absence of congenital or acquired neuromuscular disease or dysfunction
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals may not participate in this study if they meet the following criteria:
- Claustrophobia or anxiety associated with being enclosed in narrow spaces
- Muscle weakness or sensory feedback abnormalities that affect(s) gait
- Pregnancy
- Concurrent serious medical illness such as cancer; recent heart attack or stroke; heart rhythm disturbance requiring a pacemaker; diabetes that causes pain; numbness; or decreased circulation in the legs.
- Alcohol or illicit drug abuse.
- History of (or concurrent) psychiatric illness necessitating ongoing "talk" therapy and/or psychotropic medications
- History of back or neck pain lasting more than 3 days or requiring time off of work AND healthcare provider treatments within the last 2 years
- Involved in a lawsuit or receiving worker's compensation or disability payments
- Individuals with pacemakers or pacemaker wires; aneurysm clips; or metallic foreign bodies or metal shavings in the body.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Department of Neurology - UC Irvine
Irvine, California, 92697-4275, United States
Midwest Consultants for Clinical Trials LLC
Portage, Michigan, 49002, United States
Advance Clinical Research
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84102, United States
Institute de Rescherche in Physiatrie du Quebec
Montreal, Quebec, H2K 1C1, Canada
Related Publications (4)
VR Edgerton, SL Wolf, DJ Levendowski, RI Jenrich, RR Roy (1997). EMG activity in neck and back muscles during selected static postures in adult males and females. Physiology theory and practice. 13:179-195.
BACKGROUNDVR Edgerton, SL Wolf, DJ Levendowski, RL Roy (1996). Evaluating Patterns of EMG Amplitudes for Trunk and Neck Muscles of Patients and Controls. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Health, 2(1).
BACKGROUNDV.R. Edgerton, S.T. Wolf, D.J. Levendowski, and R.R. Roy (1996). Evaluating Patterns of EMG Amplitudes for Back and Trunk Muscles of Patients and Controls. International Journal of Rehabilitation and Health, 2(1).
RESULTEdgerton VR, Wolf SL, Levendowski DJ, Roy RR. Theoretical basis for patterning EMG amplitudes to assess muscle dysfunction. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1996 Jun;28(6):744-51. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199606000-00013.
PMID: 8784762RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Alan Goldman, MD
Impact Medical Solutions, Inc.
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2005
First Posted
August 24, 2005
Study Start
April 1, 2005
Study Completion
December 1, 2006
Last Updated
October 26, 2005
Record last verified: 2005-08