Transpulmonary Pressure - Guided Mechanical Ventilation in Morbidly Obese ARDS Patients: a Feasibility Study.
TGV-MOA
4 other identifiers
interventional
40
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to test a personalized intervention aiming to optimize the mechanical ventilator settings in morbidly obese patients suffering from moderate to severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). The intervention consists of personalized measurements and calculations of the different pressures inside the thorax. The main question to answer is: • Will the evaluated esophageal pressure-guided strategy lead to different mechanical ventilator settings than suggested by a strategy largely used in ARDS patients in France? A specific nasogastric probe permitting to measure esophageal pressure will monitor participants. Esophageal pressure will act as an indicator of the pleural pressure. Other respiratory signals displayed by the mechanical ventilators will also be acquired. Further, ventilator settings will be adjusted to the evaluated esophageal pressure-guided strategy, with possible benefit of this personalized approach.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 4, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 4, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 4, 2027
April 21, 2026
April 1, 2026
3 years
October 12, 2023
April 20, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The absolute value of the difference between the PEEP levels determined by esophageal pressure-guided strategy and by the PEEP level indicated by the maximal recruitment arm of the ExPress trial
To demonstrate that the evaluated esophageal pressure-guided strategy leads to significantly and clinically different mechanical ventilator settings (mainly PEEP setting) than the reference strategy.
during the first 24 hours after inclusion
Secondary Outcomes (6)
The ratio between the arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) on the inspired fraction of oxygenFiO2): PaO2/FiO2 ratio
during the intervention
The mortality rate of included patients.
Mortality rate will be determined at end of ICU stay, at Day 28 and at Day 90.
Number of days alive and free for invasive mechanical ventilation
The numbers of days alive and free for invasive mechanical ventilationwill be determined at Day-28 and Day-90
Occurrence of pneumothorax
during the intervention
Occurence of severe hemodynamic compromise defined by the need of vasoactive treatment
during the intervention
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Esophageal pressure-guided strategy,
EXPERIMENTALThe second generation esogastric multifunction Nutrivent catheter (SIDAM, Mirandola, Italy) will be used to monitor esophageal and gastric pressures during several days. Ventilator settings will be adjusted to the evaluated esophageal pressure-guided strategy, aiming to obtain a slightly positive transpulmonary pressure at the end of expiration.
Interventions
A catheter-balloon system will be positioned and calibrated in all included patients. The second generation esogastric multifunction Nutrivent catheter (SIDAM, Mirandola, Italy) will be used. It allows both enteral nutrition of the patients and monitoring of esophageal and gastric pressures during several days. A connection line will be inserted between the catheter (either esophageal or gastric balloon port) and the auxiliary pressure port of the mechanical ventilator (General Electric, R860, available in each center). Numeric recording of the respiratory signals will be achieved via the OhmedaCom Research Tool software, helping for centralization of the analyses, therefore ensuring reproducibility of the results.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patient (aged 18 years or older)
- Class III morbid obesity (BMI \> 40 kg/m2)
- Moderate or severe ARDS criteria (according to the Berlin definition)
- Tracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation
- Informed consent (patient, next of kin), with possibility of an emergency procedure with deferred consent
- Covid-19 and non-Covid-19 patients
You may not qualify if:
- Contra-indication to nasogastric tube (uncontrolled coagulopathy, severe thrombocytopenia, nasal trauma, esophageal varices)
- Order to limit life-sustaining therapy
- ExtraCorporal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in use
- Invasive mechanical ventilation \> 96 hours
- Elevated intracranial pressure
- Active air-leak: pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Patient on state medical aid
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (5)
CHU Angers
Angers, 49933, France
Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94270, France
Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, HCL
Lyon, 69004, France
AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, 75015, France
CHU la Milétrie
Poitiers, 86021, France
Related Publications (5)
Diehl JL, Talmor D. When could airway plateau pressure above 30 cmH2O be acceptable in ARDS patients? Intensive Care Med. 2021 Sep;47(9):1028-1031. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06472-5. Epub 2021 Jul 8. No abstract available.
PMID: 34236478BACKGROUNDCoudroy R, Vimpere D, Aissaoui N, Younan R, Bailleul C, Couteau-Chardon A, Lancelot A, Guerot E, Chen L, Brochard L, Diehl JL. Prevalence of Complete Airway Closure According to Body Mass Index in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Anesthesiology. 2020 Oct 1;133(4):867-878. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003444.
PMID: 32701573RESULTFlorio G, Ferrari M, Bittner EA, De Santis Santiago R, Pirrone M, Fumagalli J, Teggia Droghi M, Mietto C, Pinciroli R, Berg S, Bagchi A, Shelton K, Kuo A, Lai Y, Sonny A, Lai P, Hibbert K, Kwo J, Pino RM, Wiener-Kronish J, Amato MBP, Arora P, Kacmarek RM, Berra L; investigators of the lung rescue team. A lung rescue team improves survival in obesity with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2020 Jan 15;24(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2709-x.
PMID: 31937345RESULTRowley DD, Arrington SR, Enfield KB, Lamb KD, Kadl A, Davis JP, Theodore DJ. Transpulmonary Pressure-Guided Lung-Protective Ventilation Improves Pulmonary Mechanics and Oxygenation Among Obese Subjects on Mechanical Ventilation. Respir Care. 2021 Jul;66(7):1049-1058. doi: 10.4187/respcare.08686. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PMID: 33879565RESULTSarge T, Baedorf-Kassis E, Banner-Goodspeed V, Novack V, Loring SH, Gong MN, Cook D, Talmor D, Beitler JR; EPVent-2 Study Group. Effect of Esophageal Pressure-guided Positive End-Expiratory Pressure on Survival from Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Risk-based and Mechanistic Reanalysis of the EPVent-2 Trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 15;204(10):1153-1163. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202009-3539OC.
PMID: 34464237RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jean-Luc MD Diehl, PhD
AP-HP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2023
First Posted
November 7, 2023
Study Start
April 4, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 4, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 4, 2027
Last Updated
April 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, ICF
- Time Frame
- Two years after the last publication
- Access Criteria
- Data sharing must be accepted by the sponsor and the PI based on a scientific project and scientific involvement of the PI team. Collaboration will be fostered. The founder could be involved in the decision. Teams wishing obtain IPD must meet the sponsor and IP team to present scientifics (and commercial) purpose, IPD needed, format of data transmission, and timeframe. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contractualization. Processing of shared data must comply with European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared