Impact of Environmental Nudges on Dietary Quality
1 other identifier
interventional
2,132
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Purpose: The overall purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of a suite of environmentally focused nudges on the nutritional quality of consumers' food selections. Participants: \~2,000 US adults ages 18-25, at least 25% currently enrolled full-time in college, recruited from CloudResearch Prime Panels. Procedures: Participants will be randomly assigned to view food products with or without environmental nudges (eco-labels, peer comparison message, and swaps). They will be asked to select items that they most wish to purchase and will then be asked a series of questions about the products and nudges. Questions will also include standard socio-demographic variables.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 28, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 4, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 4, 2023
CompletedJanuary 3, 2024
October 1, 2023
6 days
October 24, 2023
January 2, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Nutri-Score Scores
Healthfulness of product selections (operationalized as products' Nutri-Score scores). Products' Nutri-Score scores are calculated using the updated 2022 algorithm released by the Scientific Committee of the Nutri-Score (ScC). Scores range from -15 (Nutri-Score of "A") to 40 (Nutri-Score of "E"), with lower scores indicating a more healthful product selection.
Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Carbon Footprint
Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit
Acceptability of Eco-Label Intervention
Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit
Acceptability of Swaps Intervention
Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit
Acceptability of Peer Comparison Message Intervention
Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit
Health Elaboration
Immediately after exposure to intervention and product selection task, assessed during 1-time online study visit
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONParticipants will conduct online shopping tasks without any environmental nudges. This includes no labels, peer comparison messages, or suggested product swaps.
Environmental
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in the experimental arm will shop and receive environmental nudges in the form of labels, peer comparisons messages, and suggested product swaps.
Interventions
Participants will view protein, frozen meal, and snack products with eco-labels applied. For each category, they will then be instructed to select 1 item from that category they wish most to purchase. Categories will be shown in random order. If a participant selects a product with a red eco-label, they will be shown a peer comparison message and will be given an opportunity to switch to a product with a yellow or green eco-label.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- to 25 years old
- Currently resides in the United States
You may not qualify if:
- Completion of the survey in \<1/3 of the median completion time
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hilllead
- Wellcome Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
UNC Carolina Population Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lindsey Smith Taillie, PhD
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anna H Grummon, PhD
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2023
First Posted
November 7, 2023
Study Start
November 28, 2023
Primary Completion
December 4, 2023
Study Completion
December 4, 2023
Last Updated
January 3, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- The deidentified dataset and corresponding survey codebook will be available upon publication of study results and will be available indefinitely.
- Access Criteria
- Anyone who wishes to access the data.
A deidentified dataset and the corresponding survey codebook will be published to a data repository. The study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form will be published alongside as supplementary material.