Fatal Overdose Review Teams - Research to Enhance Surveillance Systems

NCT06084221 | Enrolling By Invitation

• 3 other identifiers: 159221R61DA057660-014R33DA057660-02
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 400
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This project seeks to address the overdose epidemic by working with overdose fatality review (OFR) teams. Current OFR practices rely on a case review model where OFR teams assess one or two overdose cases to make policy and program recommendations. However, the continued rise in overdose rates and number of preventable overdose deaths suggest a need to shift OFR teams away from case review and toward using timely population-level data to better inform their recommendations and actions. The goal of this project, Fatal Overdose Review Teams - Research to Enhance Surveillance Systems (FORTRESS), is to improve standard OFR practices by equipping OFRs with a data dashboard built on near real-time aggregate data, linked across multiple sources and presented in a way that helps identify common "overdose touchpoints," or opportunities to connect individuals at risk for overdose with evidence-based treatment. During the first project phase, the FORTRESS team will design the "Overdose Touchpoints Dashboard'' (Aim 1). The FORTRESS team will also train OFR team members in "Data-Driven Decision Making" (DDDM) to effectively use the dashboard. The FORTRESS team also includes individuals involved in developing the CDC's OFR best practice guidelines and a pilot study of OFR adherence to these guidelines, which will inform the FORTRESS team's development of an "OFR Fidelity Tool'' (Aim 2). This tool will be the first of its kind. For the second project phase, the FORTRESS team will conduct a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge trial comparing the impact of the intervention (dashboard + DDDM training) versus standard OFR practices on both implementation (Aim 3) and effectiveness outcomes (Aim 4). Implementation outcomes include implementation process fidelity (Stages of Implementation Completion), staff acceptance of harm reduction philosophies (qualitative interviews), OFR fidelity to CDC best practices (FORTRESS OFR Fidelity Tool), and usability of the Overdose Touchpoint Dashboard, (Systems Usability Scale). A statewide OFR data repository serves as a rich source of data on effectiveness outcomes, including OFR team recommendation quality and local actions to implement recommended overdose prevention strategies. The FORTRESS team will also survey OFR team members to assess changes in their attitudes toward evidence-based overdose prevention strategies. In sum, the FORTRESS team is uniquely qualified to help OFRs use more comprehensive available data to inform quality, action-oriented recommendations to reduce overdose. Funding for this project comes from the HEAL Initiative (https://heal.nih.gov/).

Conditions

Substance-Related Disorders; Opioid-Related Disorders

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (11)

• Organizational readiness to implement change

  12-items that assess perceived readiness to implement new innovations that will be administered to 15 OFR team members and 5 system leaders per each of 18 counties.

  Months 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, & 60

• Cultural Exchange Inventory (adapted to evaluate OFR team alliance)

  15-items that measure knowledge and attitudes between organizations that will be administered to 15 OFR team members and 5 system leaders per each of 18 counties.

  Months 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, & 60

• Harm reduction acceptability scale

  25-items that measures the adoption of a harm reduction approach in responding to people who use substances that will be administered to 15 OFR team members and 5 system leaders per each of 18 counties.

  Months 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, & 60

• Systems Usability Scale

  10-items that assesses the usability of dashboard for OFRs that will be administered to 15 OFR team members and 5 system leaders per each of 18 counties.

  Months 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, & 60

• Stages of Implementation Completion (SIC)

  The SIC is a measure of implementation process fidelity and allows for continuous measurement of implementation success. The SIC is an observation-based assessment tool that qualitatively measures intervention implementation process and fidelity. Assessment of the SIC results will be ongoing across the intervention time period and into sustainment.

  Baseline through study completion, an average of 5 years

• OFR Fidelity Tool

  To be developed fidelity assessment tool that will be completed by each OFR facilitator after a monthly meeting.

  Months 18-54

• Dashboard Aggregate Usage

  Web Cookies and anonymized IDs for each unique user to track dashboard usage that will be tracked on an on-going basis. Dr. Reda will review results monthly.

  Months 14-54

• Organization's implementation climate (adapted to evaluate overdose prevention strategies)

  18-items that assesses the degree to which the climate is supportive of adopting new innovations that will be administered to 15 OFR team members and 5 system leaders per each of 18 counties.

  Months 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48, 54, & 60

• Quality OFR Recommendations

  OFR team recommendations will be gathered monthly. We will be coding the quality of OFR team recommendations using the coding system that we developed in phase 1 of our FORTRESS project. This measure involves qualitative assessments of whether a recommendation meets certain standards of quality. The qualitative coding will be conducted by research staff in a digital spreadsheet.

  Months 14-54

• Uptake of OFR Interventions

  OFR team recommendations will be gathered monthly. Uptake of an intervention will be defined as implementation of the recommendation. OFR team overdose prevention recommendations will be coded for uptake (whether or not they were implemented). This measure involves quantitative assessment of the incidence of uptake.

  Months 14-54

• Overdose

  Mortality data is collected via death certificates that are submitted by county coroners to the IDOH Division of Vital Records, which include information on underlying cause of Death. Data will include all fatal accidental drug overdose deaths (X40-X44).

  Month 35-40 (interim) and month 53-57 (final)

Study Arms (2)

OFR Team Practice as Usual

NO INTERVENTION

Data are collected regarding standard OFR Team practice and outcomes before implementation of the FORTRESS Intervention

FORTRESS

EXPERIMENTAL

Participating counties receive both training in data-driven decision making and inventory of overdose-prevention strategies

Behavioral: Data-Driven Decision Making (DDDM); Behavioral: Overdose-prevention strategies inventory

Interventions

Data-Driven Decision Making (DDDM) BEHAVIORAL

The intervention consists of providing real-time data on overdose touchpoints to OFRs and training in DDDM for continuous quality improvement cycles, leading to improved OFR recommendations and implementation of overdose prevention strategies.

FORTRESS

Overdose-prevention strategies inventory BEHAVIORAL

A list of overdose prevention and harm reduction strategies will be provided to OFRs for possible implementation, depending on local needs and final dashboard development.

FORTRESS

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• \) member of local overdose fatality review (OFR) team; OR 2) local county leader of organizations represented by OFR (OFR facilitator, public jail administrators, chief of police, judge, addiction treatment CEO/CFO, public health director, etc.).
• all residents of Indiana that have experienced fatal and/or non-fatal overdose as identified by administrative data sources.

You may not qualify if:

• N/A

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Indiana University: lead
• National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA): collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Indiana University School of Medicine

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Substance-Related Disorders; Opioid-Related Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Chemically-Induced Disorders; Mental Disorders; Narcotic-Related Disorders

Study Officials

• Matthew C Aalsma, PhD

  Indiana University School of Medicine

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Professor of Pediatrics

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 25, 2023
• First Posted: October 16, 2023
• Study Start: September 21, 2023
• Primary Completion (Estimated): September 30, 2027
• Study Completion (Estimated): September 30, 2027
• Last Updated: February 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Locations

US (1)