NCT06079658

Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study examines fat mass loss using a continuous calorie reduction protocol versus continuous caloric restriction interspersed with "diet refeeds" and "diet breaks" over 12 weeks.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable obesity

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2022

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable obesity

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2022

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 15, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 15, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 6, 2023

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 12, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 12, 2023

Status Verified

October 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

October 6, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 6, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Weight Loss, Telehealth, health Coaching, Diet Breaks

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Fat Loss

    Investigators examined body composition fat loss between groups baseline (week 0) and post intervention (week 12).

    Change in fat mass between baseline (week 0) and post intervention (week 12)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • % Weight Loss

    Change in % weightloss between baseline (week 0) and post intervention (week 12)

Study Arms (2)

Continuous Caloric Restriction (CCR) group:

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will be placed on a diet that is prescribed a 25% reduction from maintenance calories (calories to maintain current body weight) with a dietary protein intake of 1.2 g of protein/kg body mass and remaining calories split evenly between fat and carbohydrate. In this group they will adhere to a 25% caloric reduction daily for 12 weeks.

Behavioral: Continuous Caloric Restriction versus Intermittent Caloric Restriction on Fat Loss

Intermittent Caloric Restriction (ICR) group:

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will be placed on a diet that is prescribed a 25% reduction from maintenance calories (calories to maintain current body weight) with a dietary protein intake of 1.2 g of protein/kg body mass and remaining calories split evenly between fat and carbohydrate. Participants will adhere to a 25% caloric deficit daily and on every 7th day they will eat their maintenance calories known as a "diet refeed" and then on the 3rd week they will take a "diet break" of eating their Maintenance calories for 7 days.

Behavioral: Continuous Caloric Restriction versus Intermittent Caloric Restriction on Fat Loss

Interventions

This intervention seeks to investigate two different caloric restriction protocol on fat mass.

Continuous Caloric Restriction (CCR) group:Intermittent Caloric Restriction (ICR) group:

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18-65 years of age, 2) Females only, 3) All ethnicities 4). Must reside in Horry County, South Carolina, 5) have a BMI of \> 30-45 kg/m2 6) weight stable for the last 3 months 7). Exercise less than 150 minutes of physical activity per week) 8. Have access to an Apple® iPhone or Android® smart phone.

You may not qualify if:

  • Adults who are physically active greater than 150 minutes per week, participants who were unwilling or unable to attend testing sessions between 6 am and 12 pm, participants planning to take holidays and/or work-related travel during the study period (challenges adherence to the diet, and interferes with testing session scheduling, participants who have lost greater than 10 pounds in the last 3 months, participants has stated an immunodeficiency disorder, kidney disease, heart attack within the last 3 months, has known dementia, brain cancer, current eating disorders, history of significant neurological or psychiatric disorder or any other psychological condition impacting their decision making, currently taking dietary supplements that could profoundly modify metabolism or body weight, has undergone major surgery, less than 4 weeks prior to enrollment in the study, undergone bariatric surgery \<12 months prior to starting the study, or diagnosis of type 1 diabetes. Although not anticipated for this study population, women cannot be or suspect they may be pregnant.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Williams Brice Building

Conway, South Carolina, 29526, United States

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Trexler ET, Smith-Ryan AE, Norton LE. Metabolic adaptation to weight loss: implications for the athlete. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2014 Feb 27;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1550-2783-11-7.

  • Fothergill E, Guo J, Howard L, Kerns JC, Knuth ND, Brychta R, Chen KY, Skarulis MC, Walter M, Walter PJ, Hall KD. Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after "The Biggest Loser" competition. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Aug;24(8):1612-9. doi: 10.1002/oby.21538. Epub 2016 May 2.

  • Arguin H, Dionne IJ, Senechal M, Bouchard DR, Carpentier AC, Ardilouze JL, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, Brochu M. Short- and long-term effects of continuous versus intermittent restrictive diet approaches on body composition and the metabolic profile in overweight and obese postmenopausal women: a pilot study. Menopause. 2012 Aug;19(8):870-6. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318250a287.

  • Byrne NM, Sainsbury A, King NA, Hills AP, Wood RE. Intermittent energy restriction improves weight loss efficiency in obese men: the MATADOR study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2018 Feb;42(2):129-138. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.206. Epub 2017 Aug 17.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

ObesityWeight Loss

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OverweightOvernutritionNutrition DisordersNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBody Weight Changes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: All participants were randomized in a balanced fashion and stratified by body fat percentage into either one of the two intervention groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor Exercise Science

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 6, 2023

First Posted

October 12, 2023

Study Start

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion

August 15, 2023

Study Completion

August 15, 2023

Last Updated

October 12, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-10

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations