Dynamic Assessment of Phonological Disorders
1 other identifier
interventional
4
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn about (1) how speech skills can be measured and how various tests give speech therapists different types of information for children with speech sound disorder, and (2) whether changes occur in the amount of help children need when they work on easier sounds or harder sounds during treatment. The main questions this study aims to answer are: (1) what does one type of test (dynamic assessment) tell us about speech skills compared to another type of test (static assessment), and (2) does practice of easier or harder sounds show differences in progress. Participants will complete 16 sessions of speech treatment called "modified cycles treatment", and will complete several speech and language tests before, during, and after treatment by pointing to pictures, and saying sounds, words, and sentences.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2011
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 4, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 11, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 11, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 3, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 10, 2023
CompletedOctober 10, 2023
October 1, 2023
7 months
October 3, 2023
October 3, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Glaspey Dynamic Assessment of Phonology (GDAP)
The GDAP is an evaluation of speech sounds when given help while talking about pictures. The child is asked to say all sounds by themselves, in words, or in sentences. The child is given verbal modeling and instructions to help him/her say the sounds correctly to the highest level possible (i.e. sentences without any model).
Prior to treatment, after four weeks of treatment, and again after eight weeks.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Static Assessment of Single Words
Prior to treatment, after four weeks of treatment, and again after eight weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Easier Targets
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will participate in a modified Cycles approach where speech targets are worked on for a short period of time and switched within a cycle. During the Easier Targets arm, children will work on target sounds that are "easier" based on their pre-treatment scores of 8, 9, 10, or 11 on the Glaspey Dynamic Assessment of Phonology. Children will complete 8 sessions in this arm that are each 50-minutes long and occur two times per week with each target addressed for 2 sessions.
Harder Targets
EXPERIMENTALAll participants will participate in a modified Cycles approach where speech targets are worked on for a short period of time and switched within a cycle. During the Harder Targets arm, children will work on target sounds that are "harder" based on their pre-treatment scores of 15, 14, 13, or 12 on the Glaspey Dynamic Assessment of Phonology. Children will complete 8 sessions in this arm that are each 50-minutes long and occur two times per week with each target addressed for 2 sessions.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- monolingual English speakers;
- scores in the mild to profound range for phonological disorder based on the Hodson Assessment of Phonological Patterns (Hodson, 2004);
- scores above 9th percentile on receptive language and cognitive abilities based on measures from the Preschool Language Scale-4 (PLS-4) (Zimmerman, Steiner, \& Pond, 2002) and the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT) (Dunn \& Dunn, 1997);
- perform adequately on a structural-functional examination adapted from the Oral and Speech Motor Control Protocol (Robbins \& Klee, 1987) and Motor Speech Examination (Strand \& McCauley, 1999);
- exhibit voice and fluency skills within normal limits,
- pass a hearing screening adequate for understanding speech.
You may not qualify if:
- will not exhibit the prime characteristics of developmental apraxia of speech and/or dysarthria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Amy M Glaspey, Ph.D.
University of Montana
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- The participating children will not be aware of the targets identified as "easier" or "harder"
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 3, 2023
First Posted
October 10, 2023
Study Start
October 4, 2011
Primary Completion
May 11, 2012
Study Completion
May 11, 2012
Last Updated
October 10, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share