Study Stopped
Unfavourable opinion from NHS ethics. Due to low recruitment from NHS sources in another study, it was decided not to reapply but to withdraw the study.
Sharing Books With Children
How to Promote Children's Language Development Using Family-based Shared Book Reading: Study B; Examining the Effect of Training Shared Reading Practice, With Form-emphasising Books, on Children's Language and Phonological Awareness
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The promotion of language and communicative development in the early years is extremely important. Children who enter school with good language skills have better educational and economic success. This study is part of a large project across Liverpool, Manchester and Sheffield Universities to determine how shared reading promotes child language development, and use this knowledge to make it an effective language boosting tool for children across the whole socio-economic spectrum. The overall project includes:
- observational studies to identify what language boosting behaviours are responsible for shared reading's effectiveness, and how parents from different socio-economic groups use these behaviours during shared reading;
- intervention studies to evaluate packages designed to train parents in the use of specific language boosting behaviours during reading;
- a qualitative exploration of the reasons people may not read with their children. This study will provide training to parents on how to develop their children's attention to the features of words while reading books with them. The research questions are: i) Is specific training focused on the sound properties of words during shared reading more effective at developing children's phonological awareness and language than general advice on the importance of reading with children? ii) Do children with speech sound disorder and typically developing children respond differently to intervention? iii) To what extent are differences in training implementation and effects explained by socio-economic status? Our participants will be parents and their children, aged 30-54 months, with a diagnosis of speech sound disorder. They will be recruited via speech and language therapy services in the North West. Data collection will be carried out by the research team in participants' homes, taking 3-4 hours in total over 2-3 appointments. The sessions will be audio-recorded; parents will complete questionnaires, and children's language and speech will be assessed with standardised and in-house tests.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 20, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 14, 2017
CompletedJanuary 11, 2019
January 1, 2019
13 days
December 20, 2016
January 9, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in standardised Preschool Inventory of Phonological Awareness: Rhyme awareness subtest score
Change in score from the baseline to the post-training rhyme awareness PIPA subtest, which measures the ability of a child to identify a non-rhyming word embedded in a set of three rhyming words.
6 weeks
Change in standardised Preschool Inventory of Phonological Awareness: Alliteration awareness subtest score
Change in score from the baseline to the post-training alliteration awareness PIPA subtest, which measures the ability of a child to identify a non-alliterative word embedded in a set of three alliterative words.
6 weeks
Change in standardised Preschool Inventory of Phonological Awareness: Phoneme isolation subtest score
Change in score from the baseline to the post-training phoneme isolation PIPA subtest, which measures the ability of child to identify the first phoneme of a spoken word that is presented with visual aid.
6 weeks
Change in custom designed Syllable segmentation test score.
Change in score from the baseline to the post-training syllable segmentation score, which is a custom designed test which measures a child's ability to segment words into their constituent syllables.
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Phonological awareness training
EXPERIMENTALParents will be given specific training on how to improve phonological awareness using books provided by the investigator. Parents watch a video with examples of how to improve phonological awareness. Suggestions include placing emphasis on rhyme and alliteration, segmenting long words into syllables and talking about how words sound and what they mean.
Reading enjoyment training
PLACEBO COMPARATORParents will be given general training on how to make reading fun. Parents watch a video with examples of how they can bring books to life with funny voices, actions, and so on. The training is of a similar duration to the intervention arm.
Interventions
Training on specific ways to improve children's phonological awareness by making them more aware of the sound structure of words.
Training on how to make reading enjoyable for children.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- known to speech and language therapists with a diagnosis of speech sound disorder OR recognised by parents as having less mature speech production than their peers AND perform below criterion on a brief speech sound production screening assessment
You may not qualify if:
- a known neurological diagnosis (such as Down Syndrome, Autism, Cerebral Palsy)
- born before 37 weeks gestation (premature)
- weighed less than 5lb 9oz at birth (low birth weight)
- a permanent impairment of vision (unless remediated by visual aids) or hearing
- parents have a learning disability which puts their children at risk of language delay and excludes the parents from giving informed consent on their own and on their children's behalf.
- exposure to another language (not English) for 1 day or more in a typical week (please note that this also excludes children of parents who do not speak English)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Manchesterlead
- Economic and Social Research Council, United Kingdomcollaborator
- University of Liverpoolcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
The University of Manchester
Manchester, Greater Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
Related Publications (8)
Blanden, J. Bucking the trend: What enables those who are disadvantaged in childhood to succeed later in life? London: Department of Work and Pensions. 2006
BACKGROUNDBus AG, van Ijzendoorn MH, Pellegrini AD, Bus AG, van Ijzendoorn MH, Pellegrini AD. Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65(1): 1, 1995
BACKGROUNDHoff E. The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;74(5):1368-78. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00612.
PMID: 14552403BACKGROUNDJordan GE, Snow CE, Porche MV. Project EASE: The effect of a family literacy project on kindergarten students' early literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(4): 524-546, 2000
BACKGROUNDLocke A, Ginsborg J, Peers I. Development and disadvantage: implications for the early years and beyond. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2002 Jan-Mar;37(1):3-15. doi: 10.1080/13682820110089911.
PMID: 11852457BACKGROUNDManz PH, Hughes C, Barnabas E, Bracaliello C, Ginsburg-Block M. A descriptive review and meta-analysis of family-based emergent literacy interventions: To what extent is the research applicable to low-income, ethnic-minority or linguistically-diverse young children? Early Childhood Research Quarterly 25: 409-431, 2010
BACKGROUNDMol SE, Bus AG, De Jong MT, Smeets DJM, Mol S, Bus A et al. Added value of dialogic Parent-Child book readings: A meta-analysis. Early Education and Development, 19(1): 7, 2008
BACKGROUNDSutton Trust (2012). Social mobility and education gaps in the four major Anglophone countries. Report of The Sutton Trust/Carnegie Social Mobility Summit held at the Royal Society.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anne Hesketh, PhD
The University of Manchester
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 20, 2016
First Posted
December 30, 2016
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 14, 2017
Study Completion
March 14, 2017
Last Updated
January 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share