NCT03006744

Brief Summary

The promotion of language and communicative development in the early years is extremely important. Children who enter school with good language skills have better educational and economic success. This study is part of a large project across Liverpool, Manchester and Sheffield Universities to determine how shared reading promotes child language development, and use this knowledge to make it an effective language boosting tool for children across the whole socio-economic spectrum. The overall project includes:

  • observational studies to identify what language boosting behaviours are responsible for shared reading's effectiveness, and how parents from different socio-economic groups use these behaviours during shared reading;
  • intervention studies to evaluate packages designed to train parents in the use of specific language boosting behaviours during reading;
  • a qualitative exploration of the reasons people may not read with their children. This study will provide training to parents on how to develop their children's attention to the features of words while reading books with them. The research questions are: i) Is specific training focused on the sound properties of words during shared reading more effective at developing children's phonological awareness and language than general advice on the importance of reading with children? ii) Do children with speech sound disorder and typically developing children respond differently to intervention? iii) To what extent are differences in training implementation and effects explained by socio-economic status? Our participants will be parents and their children, aged 30-54 months, with a diagnosis of speech sound disorder. They will be recruited via speech and language therapy services in the North West. Data collection will be carried out by the research team in participants' homes, taking 3-4 hours in total over 2-3 appointments. The sessions will be audio-recorded; parents will complete questionnaires, and children's language and speech will be assessed with standardised and in-house tests.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 20, 2016

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 30, 2016

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2017

Completed
13 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 14, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 14, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

January 11, 2019

Status Verified

January 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

13 days

First QC Date

December 20, 2016

Last Update Submit

January 9, 2019

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in standardised Preschool Inventory of Phonological Awareness: Rhyme awareness subtest score

    Change in score from the baseline to the post-training rhyme awareness PIPA subtest, which measures the ability of a child to identify a non-rhyming word embedded in a set of three rhyming words.

    6 weeks

  • Change in standardised Preschool Inventory of Phonological Awareness: Alliteration awareness subtest score

    Change in score from the baseline to the post-training alliteration awareness PIPA subtest, which measures the ability of a child to identify a non-alliterative word embedded in a set of three alliterative words.

    6 weeks

  • Change in standardised Preschool Inventory of Phonological Awareness: Phoneme isolation subtest score

    Change in score from the baseline to the post-training phoneme isolation PIPA subtest, which measures the ability of child to identify the first phoneme of a spoken word that is presented with visual aid.

    6 weeks

  • Change in custom designed Syllable segmentation test score.

    Change in score from the baseline to the post-training syllable segmentation score, which is a custom designed test which measures a child's ability to segment words into their constituent syllables.

    6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Phonological awareness training

EXPERIMENTAL

Parents will be given specific training on how to improve phonological awareness using books provided by the investigator. Parents watch a video with examples of how to improve phonological awareness. Suggestions include placing emphasis on rhyme and alliteration, segmenting long words into syllables and talking about how words sound and what they mean.

Behavioral: Phonological awareness training

Reading enjoyment training

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Parents will be given general training on how to make reading fun. Parents watch a video with examples of how they can bring books to life with funny voices, actions, and so on. The training is of a similar duration to the intervention arm.

Behavioral: Reading enjoyment training

Interventions

Training on specific ways to improve children's phonological awareness by making them more aware of the sound structure of words.

Phonological awareness training

Training on how to make reading enjoyable for children.

Reading enjoyment training

Eligibility Criteria

Age42 Months - 54 Months
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • known to speech and language therapists with a diagnosis of speech sound disorder OR recognised by parents as having less mature speech production than their peers AND perform below criterion on a brief speech sound production screening assessment

You may not qualify if:

  • a known neurological diagnosis (such as Down Syndrome, Autism, Cerebral Palsy)
  • born before 37 weeks gestation (premature)
  • weighed less than 5lb 9oz at birth (low birth weight)
  • a permanent impairment of vision (unless remediated by visual aids) or hearing
  • parents have a learning disability which puts their children at risk of language delay and excludes the parents from giving informed consent on their own and on their children's behalf.
  • exposure to another language (not English) for 1 day or more in a typical week (please note that this also excludes children of parents who do not speak English)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The University of Manchester

Manchester, Greater Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (8)

  • Blanden, J. Bucking the trend: What enables those who are disadvantaged in childhood to succeed later in life? London: Department of Work and Pensions. 2006

    BACKGROUND
  • Bus AG, van Ijzendoorn MH, Pellegrini AD, Bus AG, van Ijzendoorn MH, Pellegrini AD. Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65(1): 1, 1995

    BACKGROUND
  • Hoff E. The specificity of environmental influence: socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;74(5):1368-78. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00612.

    PMID: 14552403BACKGROUND
  • Jordan GE, Snow CE, Porche MV. Project EASE: The effect of a family literacy project on kindergarten students' early literacy skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(4): 524-546, 2000

    BACKGROUND
  • Locke A, Ginsborg J, Peers I. Development and disadvantage: implications for the early years and beyond. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2002 Jan-Mar;37(1):3-15. doi: 10.1080/13682820110089911.

    PMID: 11852457BACKGROUND
  • Manz PH, Hughes C, Barnabas E, Bracaliello C, Ginsburg-Block M. A descriptive review and meta-analysis of family-based emergent literacy interventions: To what extent is the research applicable to low-income, ethnic-minority or linguistically-diverse young children? Early Childhood Research Quarterly 25: 409-431, 2010

    BACKGROUND
  • Mol SE, Bus AG, De Jong MT, Smeets DJM, Mol S, Bus A et al. Added value of dialogic Parent-Child book readings: A meta-analysis. Early Education and Development, 19(1): 7, 2008

    BACKGROUND
  • Sutton Trust (2012). Social mobility and education gaps in the four major Anglophone countries. Report of The Sutton Trust/Carnegie Social Mobility Summit held at the Royal Society.

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Speech Sound Disorder

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Communication DisordersNeurodevelopmental DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Anne Hesketh, PhD

    The University of Manchester

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 20, 2016

First Posted

December 30, 2016

Study Start

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion

March 14, 2017

Study Completion

March 14, 2017

Last Updated

January 11, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations