Project Looking-Glass Evaluation
Evaluation of Novel CT Imaging for Simulation on a Linear Accelerator
2 other identifiers
interventional
27
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pilot study to validate the new design and workflow of Cone-Beam CT imaging for radiation therapy treatment simulation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 19, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 11, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2026
ExpectedSeptember 15, 2025
September 1, 2025
11 months
August 28, 2023
September 12, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Acceptability of image quality of the novel cone-beam CT imaging system compared to that of standard cone-beam CT imaging and that of conventional fan beam CT imaging used for radiotherapy planning purposes
Qualitative results (Yes is acceptable/No is not acceptable) will be reported as tabulated data to demonstrate the differences from the standard practice
1 year
Ease of use of the novel cone-beam CT imaging system compared to standard practice
Ease of use of the novel cone-beam CT imaging system on a scale of 1 (very easy to use, no difficulty) to 5 (unable to use due to difficulty)
1 year
Quantitative comparison of the image quality of the novel cone-beam CT imaging system to that of standard cone-beam CT imaging and that of conventional fan beam CT imaging used for radiotherapy planning purposes
A scale of Better/Worse/Equal will be used for metrics such as CBCT image artifact, CBCT image quality for OAR contouring, CBCT image quality for GTV contouring, motion artifacts, auto-segmentation ability, electron density similarity
1 year
Statistical significance of quantitative comparison of the image quality of the novel cone-beam CT imaging system and standard practice
For situations that the quantitative results will be measured, such as the structure volume or predicted electron densities etc., statistical significance will be calculated.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Evaluation of the suitability and workflow of the novel CBCT images for radiation treatment planning and dose calculation.
1 year
Study Arms (1)
Evaluate the Halcyon 4.0 obtained CBCT in comparison to a CT SIM for radiotherapy dose planning
EXPERIMENTALTo evaluate the Halcyon 4.0 as a machine that will obtain CBCT that will be comparable to a CT simulator for radiotherapy treatment planning dose calculation. The novel CBCT images of subjects with malignancies from six disease sites obtained during the course of treatment for evaluation in place of the standard evaluation CBCT will be compared to their initial standard conventional CT simulation images used for treatment planning.
Interventions
This Halcyon 4.0 is a new imaging hardware recently developed by Varian and approved by the FDA.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects will be treated with external beam radiotherapy at the Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine for any of the following malignancies: head-and-neck, thoracic, breast, gastrointestinal, gynecologic, or genitourinary.
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Ability to understand the requirements of the study and to give written informed consent, as determined by the treating physician
- Availability of a complete set of treatment plans, including CT simulation images, target and normal structure contours, and radiation treatment prescriptions
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who are pregnant or have plans for pregnancy during the period of treatment.
- Any malignancy not stated above.
- Those unable to be treated on any linear accelerator (whether Truebeam™ or Halcyon™) unit either due to subject anatomy or treatment plan.
- Those undergoing proton therapy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Medicinelead
- Varian Medical Systemscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michelle Alonso-Basanta, MD, PhD
University of Pennsylvania
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 28, 2023
First Posted
September 28, 2023
Study Start
November 19, 2023
Primary Completion
October 11, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Last Updated
September 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share