Assessment of the AB HiFocusTM Mid Scala Electrode Movement Using Cone Beam Imaging Following Cochlea Implantation

NCT01940783 | Unknown DMC

• 1 other identifier: NL44381.068.13/METC 13-1-054
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 14
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

One of the contributing factors to the variability in outcomes amongst Cochlear Implant (CI) recipients was reported to be the placement of the electrode array in the scala tympani. It seems that the correct placement of the electrode initially into the scala tympani and subsequent avoidance of dislocation into the scala vestibuli as the insertion progresses, is a key factor in achieving good speech perception outcomes. Another important aspect related to the performance is the achievement of consistent electrical coverage with the electrode. Data reported for electrodes of different manufacturers give depths ranging from 240 - 600 degrees showing the considerable variation across subjects. The HiFocus mid scala electrode was developed to cover one and a quarter turn and with the pre-curved design to be less susceptible to variations in individual cochlea dimensions and insertion techniques. A further mechanical feature of the pre-curved design is the avoidance of forces against the cochlear lateral wall and associated lower susceptibility of the electrode for moving out of the cochlea following insertion. Recently, a cone beam CT (CBCT) technique is being explored in the field of ENT with the potential to overcome some of the issues associated with the conventional CT techniques such as scattering, radiation and low isometric resolution. Images with comparable details to those of e.g. micro CTs are possible with much lower radiation dose. Modern imaging software i.e. 3D Slicer (www.slicer.org) may be used for 3D reconstruction, post processing and Brainsfit for registration. Registration is the alignment of two scans in the same coordinate system. This enables the identification of differences between two images recorded at time x and y. Once accurately superimposed any difference between the two images may be identified with an accuracy of 0.2 mm. Using these methods, one can assess the stability and the position of the electrode in the cochlea. Objective: The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the feasibility of using cone beam CT technique in combination with (high resolution) MRI to identify electrode movements following cochlear implant surgery and identify the inter-scalar position of the HFms electrode. The secondary objective is to quantify the average insertion depth and variations of the HFms electrode

Conditions

Cochlear Implantation; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• movement of the electrode post-operatively in millimetres

  3 months

Study Arms (1)

Intervention

OTHER

All participants in the study will receive one pre-operative MRI, prior to cochlear implantation, and two cone-beam computed tomography scans, after cochlear implantation

Radiation: Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT); Device: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Interventions

Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) RADIATION

Two postoperative CBCT scans, the first one on the day after cochlear implantation and the second after 3 months.

Intervention

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) DEVICE

One pre-operative (before cochlear implantation) MRI scan of the cochlea.

Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years+
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Adults 18y or older meeting the conventional Dutch CI criteria
• The patient will receives the HiFocus Mid Scala electrode
• No cochlear or neural abnormalities that could compromise the placement of the electrode as assessed by the CI surgeon

You may not qualify if:

• Physical or non-physical contraindications for MRI or CT imaging
• No additional disabilities that may prevent active participation and testing as per protocol

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Maastricht University Medical Center: lead
• Advanced Bionics: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Maastricht University Medical Center

Maastricht, Limburg, 6202 AZ, Netherlands

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tomography; Diagnostic Imaging; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Diagnosis

Study Officials

• Robert Stokroos, MD PhD

  Maastricht University Medical Center

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Marc van Hoof, MD

CONTACT

+31433876543; marc.hoofvan@mumc.nl

Guido Dees, MD, MSc

CONTACT

+31433876543; guido.dees@mumc.nl

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: NA
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
• Intervention Model: SINGLE GROUP
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: MD, MSc

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 9, 2013
• First Posted: September 12, 2013
• Study Start: September 1, 2013
• Primary Completion: September 1, 2014
• Study Completion: September 1, 2014
• Last Updated: September 12, 2013

Record last verified: 2013-09

Locations

NL (1)