NCT06050538

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare between laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair of inguinal hernia in recurrent inguinal hernia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
44

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2021

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2021

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2023

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 21, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 22, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

August 21, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 21, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

TAPPTEPLaparoscopic Inguinal HerniaRecurrent hernia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative pain

    by use of visual analog scale (VAS) where (0) refereed to no pain and (10) refereed to the severest pain.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • operative time

    6 months

  • complications

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

patients with recurrent inguinal hernia who had Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach

Procedure: Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) using polyprolene mesh

Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

patients with recurrent inguinal hernia who had Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach

Procedure: Total extraperitoneal (TEP) hernioplasty using polyprolene mesh

Interventions

Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach for recurrent inguinal hernia using polyprolene mesh

Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP)

Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach for recurrent inguinal hernia using polyprolene mesh

Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients diagnosed with unilateral or bilateral recurrent inguinal hernias.
  • Patients between 18 and 70 years old
  • Fit for anesthesia.
  • Agree to participate in the study
  • Both genders were included.

You may not qualify if:

  • Unfitness for general anesthesia and operation.
  • Age \< 18 years or \>70 years.
  • Complicated hernias (acute irreducible, obstruction or strangulation).
  • The presence of mental or psychological disorders.
  • Refusal to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mansoura University Hospitl

Al Mansurah, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hernia, InguinalHernia

Interventions

tetra-4-amidinophenoxypropanetetraethylpyrazine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hernia, AbdominalPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Islam Hisham, MSc

    Mansoura University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Masking Details
Each patient was randomly allocated to the TAPP group or the TEP group by sequentially numbered, opaque , sealed envelope (SNOSE) technique on the day of surgery. An independent statistician , who was not involved in patient care, generated the randomization sequence via a computer generated random number. The randomization code was contained in opaque sealed envelopes. A junior resident , who opened the envelope , was not actively involved in outcome measurements .Before randomization and during the consent, all patients received an explanation of the objectives of the study, techniques and complications associated with both procedures.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: patients diagnosed with recurrent inguinal hernia. The study population were randomly distributed into 2 groups by computer generating program; group (1) included patients who had Transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approach while group (2) included patients who had Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2023

First Posted

September 22, 2023

Study Start

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion

February 1, 2023

Study Completion

August 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Locations