Recurrent Inguinal Hernia Treatment - Lichtenstein Versus Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Preperitoneal Hernioplasty
Lichtenstein Hernioplasty Versus Totally Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Hernioplasty in Treatment of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia - A Prospective Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study aims at detecting possible differences between an open (Lichtenstein) and a video-assisted (TEP) technique in treating recurrent inguinal hernia. The differences monitored are further recurrence and chronic pain as well as primary complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 1997
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 1997
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2002
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2007
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 18, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 24, 2008
CompletedMay 22, 2008
May 1, 2008
5.1 years
March 18, 2008
May 20, 2008
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
further recurrence
3 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Secondary Outcomes (1)
chronic pain or discomfort
3 weeks, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years
Study Arms (2)
1
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive Lichtenstein hernioplasty as a treatment for recurrent inguinal hernia.
2
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive laparoscopic TEP as a treatment for recurrent inguinal hernia.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- recurrent inguinal hernia
- willing to participate
You may not qualify if:
- unwilling to participate
- bilateral hernia
- preference towards either treatment arm
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
North Karelia Central Hospital - Clinic of Surgery
Joensuu, Pohjois-Karjala, FI-80210, Finland
Related Publications (1)
Kouhia ST, Huttunen R, Silvasti SO, Heiskanen JT, Ahtola H, Uotila-Nieminen M, Kiviniemi VV, Hakala T. Lichtenstein hernioplasty versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia--a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2009 Mar;249(3):384-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318196d0b0.
PMID: 19247022DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 18, 2008
First Posted
March 24, 2008
Study Start
January 1, 1997
Primary Completion
February 1, 2002
Study Completion
April 1, 2007
Last Updated
May 22, 2008
Record last verified: 2008-05