Feasibility of Re-TREPP in Patients With a Recurrent Inguinal Hernia After Previous TREPP Repair
re-TREPP
Management of Recurrent Inguinal Hernia After Previous Open Preperitoneal Repair: Is Re-TREPP Feasible?
1 other identifier
observational
19
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The Trans REctussheath PrePeritoneal (TREPP) mesh repair was introduced in 2006 to decrease the risk of postoperative inguinal pain in hernia surgery. For the repair of a recurrent inguinal hernia after a primary TREPP an alternative open anterior route (Lichtenstein) may seem the most logical option, but coincides with an increased risk of chronic postoperative inguinal pain. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a second TREPP procedure to repair a recurrent inguinal hernia after an initial TREPP repair. The hypothesis was that the technique is possible and does not lead to an increased risk of postoperative pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Nov 2015
Shorter than P25 for all trials
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 27, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 10, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 4, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 26, 2018
CompletedJanuary 29, 2018
January 1, 2018
13 days
January 4, 2018
January 25, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Chronic postoperative inguinal pain according to Visual Analogue Scale.
All patients who reported chronic pain (\>30 days postoperative) were asked to fill out the Visual Analogue Scale. This was a horizontal line of 100 millimeters long. Patients were asked to mark the point that indicated the amount of pain that they experienced. The length between the left anchor 'no pain' and the patients mark was measured, providing a range of 0 to 100. A greater score indicated greater pain intensity.
This was assessed between >30 days postoperative and the moment of evaluation (up to 95 months postoperative).
Chronic postoperative pain according to Pain Disability Index
All patients who reported chronic pain (\>30 days postoperative) were asked to fill out the Pain Disability Index questionnaire.
This was assessed between >30 days postoperative and the moment of evaluation (up to 95 months postoperative).
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Re-recurrence rate
This was assessed by reviewing the electronic patient files and via a physical examination at the long term follow-up (ranging from >30 days postoperative, up to 95 months postoperative).
Short term complications
Complications occuring from the start of the operation up to 30 days postoperative.
Sexual complaints related to re-TREPP
This was assessed between >30 days postoperative and the moment of evaluation (up to 95 months postoperative).
Study Arms (1)
re-TREPP
Patients who presented with a recurrent inguinal hernia after previous TREPP repair.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
From all re-TREPP patients (n=19), the mean age at time of the re-operation was 68 years (range 56-86 years). All included patients, 18 males and 1 female, were classified with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification ≤3.
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients who had developed a recurrent inguinal hernia and had undergone a re-TREPP.
You may not qualify if:
- Children (age \<18 years)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Giel G Koning, MSc, PhD
St Jansdal Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Drs. A.M. Persoon
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 4, 2018
First Posted
January 26, 2018
Study Start
November 27, 2015
Primary Completion
December 10, 2015
Study Completion
January 31, 2016
Last Updated
January 29, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share