PENG Block and Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block For Hip Replacement Surgery
Postoperative Analgesia Outcomes Of Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) Combined With Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block After Hip Replacement Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: this study aimed to describe the pain relief outcomes after hip replacement surgery by continuous Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) in combination with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block under the guidance of ultrasound. Methods: patients who had hip surgery at E University hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam from August 2021 to August 2022 belonged to two groups: group of patients with pain relief with PENG block in combination with LFCN block (PENG BLOCK group) and group of patients with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA group). Outcomes regarding clinical and pain score from initiation of insertion or PCA insertion (H0) to after 72 hours (H72) were recorded.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 3, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2023
CompletedSeptember 18, 2023
September 1, 2023
1.1 years
September 7, 2023
September 14, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
VAS score at rest and on movement
the average VAS score (Visual Analogue Scale) at rest and on movement of both groups. The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) measures pain intensity. The VAS consists of a 10cm line, with two end points representing 0 ('no pain') and 10 ('pain as bad as it could possibly be'). Ask the patient to rate their current level of pain by placing a mark on the line. Use a ruler to measure the distance in centimetres from the 'no pain marker' (or zero) to the current pain mark.
Time was recorded from initiation of catheterization or PCA insertion (H0) to after 72 hours (H72)
Side effects
Rate of vomitting/nausea, itchy, urinary retention, respiratory failure postoperative of both groups.
Time was recorded from initiation of catheterization or PCA insertion (H0) to after 72 hours (H72)
Study Arms (2)
PENG BLOCK
EXPERIMENTALreceiving pain relief through PENG and LFCN block
PCA
ACTIVE COMPARATORreceiving morphine PCA analgesia
Interventions
During and after the surgery, a group of patients received intravenous morphine analgesia via PCA (concentration 1mg/ml, bolus dose of 1mg, lock time 10 minutes, maximum dose 10mg/4 hours). The remaining group of patients receive pain relief by PENG block and LFCN block. In this group, the ultrasound probe was placed horizontally from the anterior superior iliac spine, and was moved along the femoral arc defining the pubic spine. Then, the transducer was rotated 45 degrees, moved parallel to the femoral arch identifying the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS), iliopubic eminence (IPE) and inferior lumbosacral head. The ultrasound probe was moved lightly until the upper end of the femoral head was identified. Next, a 120 mm Tuohy 18G anesthetic needle was used under ultrasound guidance, which was moved lateral to medial in the plane between the ultrasound transducer and the superior tip of the femoral head. Then, 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.25% was injected through the anesthetic needle tip
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III.
- Patients had hip replacement surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- infection of the anesthetized area.
- coagulation disorders
- organs dysfunction
- allergy to anesthetics
- did not cooperate with physicians
- history of opioid dependence
- inability to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hanoi Medical University
Hanoi, Vietnam
Related Publications (9)
Ferguson RJ, Palmer AJ, Taylor A, Porter ML, Malchau H, Glyn-Jones S. Hip replacement. Lancet. 2018 Nov 3;392(10158):1662-1671. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31777-X.
PMID: 30496081RESULTFerrata P, Carta S, Fortina M, Scipio D, Riva A, Di Giacinto S. Painful hip arthroplasty: definition. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2011 May;8(2):19-22.
PMID: 22461810RESULTYaDeau JT, Tedore T, Goytizolo EA, Kim DH, Green DS, Westrick A, Fan R, Rade MC, Ranawat AS, Coleman SH, Kelly BT. Lumbar plexus blockade reduces pain after hip arthroscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2012 Oct;115(4):968-72. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318265bacd. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
PMID: 22822195RESULTDuarte LT, Beraldo PS, Saraiva RA. [Effects of epidural analgesia and continuous lumbar plexus block on functional rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty]. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Sep-Oct;59(5):531-44. doi: 10.1016/s0034-7094(09)70078-9. Portuguese.
PMID: 19784509RESULTSingelyn FJ, Ferrant T, Malisse MF, Joris D. Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, continuous epidural analgesia, and continuous femoral nerve sheath block on rehabilitation after unilateral total-hip arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;30(5):452-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.05.008.
PMID: 16135349RESULTLin DY, Morrison C, Brown B, Saies AA, Pawar R, Vermeulen M, Anderson SR, Lee TS, Doornberg J, Kroon HM, Jaarsma RL. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block provides improved short-term analgesia compared with the femoral nerve block in hip fracture surgery: a single-center double-blinded randomized comparative trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 May;46(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102315. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
PMID: 33637625RESULTShafiq F, Hamid M, Samad K. Complications and interventions associated with epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief in a tertiary care hospital. Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Oct;20(6):827-32.
PMID: 21526668RESULTRasouli MR, Viscusi ER. Adductor Canal Block for Knee Surgeries: An Emerging Analgesic Technique. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2017 May;5(3):131-132. No abstract available.
PMID: 28656158RESULTKamel I, Ahmed MF, Sethi A. Regional anesthesia for orthopedic procedures: What orthopedic surgeons need to know. World J Orthop. 2022 Jan 18;13(1):11-35. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v13.i1.11. eCollection 2022 Jan 18.
PMID: 35096534RESULT
Related Links
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Tu Nguyen, Professor
Hanoi Medical University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2023
First Posted
September 18, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2021
Primary Completion
August 31, 2022
Study Completion
September 3, 2022
Last Updated
September 18, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
- Time Frame
- from September 2023 to the unidentified time
- Access Criteria
- anesthesiologists, surgeons all over the world
We agree that all results and conclusion of this research will be used fully for other researchers