NCT06032351

Brief Summary

This study will use the concept of competency-based education to develop an innovative integrated curriculum with EPAs to guide learning and assessment of competency performance to equip students with dementia care management competency and cultivate professionals to meet the social trends and practical needs.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
190

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 21, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 13, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 27, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 5, 2024

Status Verified

July 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

August 21, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 3, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Teaching MethodMedical Practice ManagementCompetenceCompetency-Based Education

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Demographic data of student

    Include age, gender, education level, areas of studying, etc.

    The investigators will collect demographic data of students on the day before the start date of the intervention.

  • Dementia Care Professional Competency Assessment Scale

    1. The scale was developed by our past research that was supported by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant Number 106-2511-S-255-002-MY3). The scale is used to evaluate dementia care competency in students (Huang et al., 2018). 2. This Scale contains nine subscales (74 items), using Likert 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5. A higher score means better competencies. 3. This scale is used to evaluate the competence of students.

    T0(Baseline), T1(Immediately after the intervention), T2(3 months after the intervention).

  • Problem solving, Teamwork Competency Assessment Scale

    1. The scale was developed by our past research that was supported by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant Number 106-2511-S-255-002-MY3). There are 22 questions on this scale. The scale is used to evaluate the problem-solving and teamwork competency of students. (Huang et al. 2018). 2. This scale contains 22 items.10 items were used to evaluate problem-solving competencies, 12 items were used to evaluate teamwork competencies. A higher score means better competencies. 3. This scale is used to evaluate the competence of students. Change from Baseline problem-solving and teamwork competency at the end of the semester, and after students finish the clinical practice course.

    T0(Baseline), T1(Immediately after the intervention), T2(3 months after the intervention).

  • Learning Satisfaction Scale

    1. The scale was developed by our past research that was supported by the Taiwan Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant Number 106-2511-S-255-002-MY3). There are 9 questions on this scale. The scale is used to evaluate the learning satisfaction of students. (Huang et al. 2018). 2. This Scale contains 9 items, using Likert 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5. A higher score means high learning satisfaction. 3. This scale is used to evaluate the learning satisfaction of students.

    Immediately after the intervention.

  • Performance in a summative OSCE test (OSCE scores)

    1. Conduct Objective Structured Clinical Examination 2. After the intervention, the study sample participated in the final OSCE exam. Their scores were compared. The minimum value was 0 while the maximum value was 100. The higher the score the better students had performed.

    Immediately after the intervention.

  • Qualitative interview

    Conduct qualitative interviews with the curriculum integration group students, focusing on the effectiveness of the curriculum integration.

    The investigators will conduct qualitative interviews using focus groups 3 months after the intervention.

Study Arms (2)

conventional teaching group

OTHER

conventional teaching methods

Other: Traditional classroom teaching course programs

curriculum integration Group

EXPERIMENTAL

The curriculum integration group will receive two intervention phases, including an innovation-integrated curriculum for dementia care and an innovation-integrated curriculum for care management with Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) to guide learning and assessment of competency performance to equip students with dementia care management competency.

Other: Innovation-integrated curriculum for dementia care and care management

Interventions

The curriculum integration group will receive two intervention phases, including an innovation-integrated curriculum for dementia care and an innovation-integrated curriculum for care management with Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs), lectures, Situated Simulation Learning, Team-based learning, and Objective Structured Clinical Examination(OSCE).

Also known as: experimental group
curriculum integration Group

The conventional teaching group will receive only traditional classroom teaching course programs.

Also known as: Control Group
conventional teaching group

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • (1)Be at least 20 years old.
  • (2)The students are freshmen majoring in the Department of Gerontology and Health Care Management, and taking the course on Dementia care.
  • (3)Before taking the course on Dementia care, have taken courses on basic geriatric nursing.
  • (4)voluntary participation

You may not qualify if:

  • The students who suspension of schooling.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chang Gung University of Science and Technology

Taoyuan District, 333, Taiwan

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dementia

Interventions

Control Groups

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Epidemiologic Research DesignEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesResearch DesignMethods

Study Officials

  • Huei-Ling Huang, PhD

    Chang Gung University of Science and Technology

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Huei-Ling Huang, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor, PhD, RN, Department of Gerontology and Health Care Management, College of Nursing, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Taoyuan, Taiwan, R.O.C

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2023

First Posted

September 13, 2023

Study Start

February 27, 2024

Primary Completion

July 31, 2025

Study Completion

July 31, 2025

Last Updated

July 5, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-07

Locations