NCT06028100

Brief Summary

Several studies have shown that sacral espb blocks the dorsal ramus of spinal nerves. In lumbar discectomy operations, innervation of all tissues where pain occurs is provided by the dorsal ramus of the nerves. Based on this information, it was thought that sacral espb would be effective in lumbar discectomies. The investigators wanted to look at the effects of sacral erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in lumbar discectomy operations. There is no randomised controlled study on sacral espb in the literature. The researchers think that the results of the study are promising. Sacral espb is an easy-to-administer block with a low risk of complications and can be used effectively in lumbar discectomy analgesia.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 30, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 30, 2023

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 31, 2023

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 7, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 11, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 31, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 7, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

regional blockerector spinae plane blockpain management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient pain scores

    Visual Analog Scala (0:No pain 10: Worst pain possible)

    24 hours

  • Patient total opioid consumption

    The number of patient controlled analgesia device boluses doses

    24 hours

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Nausea-vomiting

    24 hours

  • Patient satisfaction

    24. hours

Study Arms (2)

espb group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The first group underwent sacral espb at the end of surgery. The lumbosacral region was sterilised with povidine iodine and then draped with the patient in prone position. The linear ultrasound probe was placed in the midline on the spinous process of the 5th lumbar vertebra after the sterile covering had been applied. After observation of the sacrum, the level of the 2nd median crest was determined and the ultrasound probe was moved 1.5-2 cm laterally and the 2nd intermediate crest and the erector spinae muscle between the two were observed. 22 G 50 mm needle was advanced from caudal to cranial direction to the sacral crest using in-plane technique, after confirming the needle position with 1-2 ml saline, 0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml was administered, local anaesthesia was observed to spread cauda-cranially separating the erector spinae muscle from the sacral crest, the same procedure was performed on the opposite side

Procedure: sacral erector spinae plane block

control group

NO INTERVENTION

The second group had no any block

Interventions

espb from bilateral sacral level 2 with 20 ml %0,25 bupivacaine

espb group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • patients over 18 years of age,
  • American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA) status 1-3 group

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who refused to participate in the study
  • Patients with known neuromuscular and haematological diseases
  • Allergy to local anaesthetics
  • Contraindications to regional anaesthesia
  • Anatomical changes in the lumbo-sacral region

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Giresun Research and Training Hospital

Merkez, Giresun, 28100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Yayik AM, Cesur S, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A, Ay AN, Celik EC, Karaavci NC. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e779-e785. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.149. Epub 2019 Mar 8.

  • Bajwa SJ, Haldar R. Pain management following spinal surgeries: An appraisal of the available options. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):105-10. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.161589.

  • Kilicaslan A, Aydin A, Kekec AF, Ahiskalioglu A. Sacral erector spinae plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia for pelvic and sacral fracture surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109674. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109674. Epub 2019 Dec 4. No abstract available.

  • Chakraborty A, Chakraborty S, Sen S, Bhatacharya T, Khemka R. Modification of the sacral erector spinae plane block using an ultrasound-guided sacral foramen injection: dermatomal distribution and radiocontrast study. Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1538-1539. doi: 10.1111/anae.15549. Epub 2021 Jul 26. No abstract available.

  • Mistry T, Sonawane K, Balasubramanian S, Balavenkatasubramanian J, Goel VK. Ultrasound-guided sacral multifidus plane block for sacral spine surgery: A case report. Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Apr-Jun;16(2):236-239. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_723_21. Epub 2022 Mar 17.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Bilge Olgun Keleş, M.D.

    Giresun University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The patient did not know what was done to him/her because the block was performed before the patient woke up. The investigator who questioned postoperative pain and opioid consumption did not know to whom the block was performed.
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: 54 patients were included in the study, divided into two groups of 27 patients as esp block (group 1) and control group (group 2), both groups underwent standard general anaesthesia. The blocks were performed in the operating theatre at the end of the operation, before the patient woke up.A patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device was given to both groups by another doctor blinded to the group, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores assessed for 24 hours.And total consumption of analgesic and rescue analgesics were recorded.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2023

First Posted

September 7, 2023

Study Start

June 1, 2023

Primary Completion

July 30, 2023

Study Completion

August 30, 2023

Last Updated

September 11, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Since it is the first study on this subject in the literature

Locations