Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block(ESPB) in Lumbar Discectomy
ESPB
The Effect of an Ultrasound-guided Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block on the Post-operative Pain of Lumbar Discectomy Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Several studies have shown that sacral espb blocks the dorsal ramus of spinal nerves. In lumbar discectomy operations, innervation of all tissues where pain occurs is provided by the dorsal ramus of the nerves. Based on this information, it was thought that sacral espb would be effective in lumbar discectomies. The investigators wanted to look at the effects of sacral erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain and opioid consumption in lumbar discectomy operations. There is no randomised controlled study on sacral espb in the literature. The researchers think that the results of the study are promising. Sacral espb is an easy-to-administer block with a low risk of complications and can be used effectively in lumbar discectomy analgesia.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 7, 2023
CompletedSeptember 11, 2023
September 1, 2023
2 months
August 31, 2023
September 7, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Patient pain scores
Visual Analog Scala (0:No pain 10: Worst pain possible)
24 hours
Patient total opioid consumption
The number of patient controlled analgesia device boluses doses
24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Nausea-vomiting
24 hours
Patient satisfaction
24. hours
Study Arms (2)
espb group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe first group underwent sacral espb at the end of surgery. The lumbosacral region was sterilised with povidine iodine and then draped with the patient in prone position. The linear ultrasound probe was placed in the midline on the spinous process of the 5th lumbar vertebra after the sterile covering had been applied. After observation of the sacrum, the level of the 2nd median crest was determined and the ultrasound probe was moved 1.5-2 cm laterally and the 2nd intermediate crest and the erector spinae muscle between the two were observed. 22 G 50 mm needle was advanced from caudal to cranial direction to the sacral crest using in-plane technique, after confirming the needle position with 1-2 ml saline, 0.25% bupivacaine 20 ml was administered, local anaesthesia was observed to spread cauda-cranially separating the erector spinae muscle from the sacral crest, the same procedure was performed on the opposite side
control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe second group had no any block
Interventions
espb from bilateral sacral level 2 with 20 ml %0,25 bupivacaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients over 18 years of age,
- American Society of Anesthesiology(ASA) status 1-3 group
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refused to participate in the study
- Patients with known neuromuscular and haematological diseases
- Allergy to local anaesthetics
- Contraindications to regional anaesthesia
- Anatomical changes in the lumbo-sacral region
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Giresun Research and Training Hospital
Merkez, Giresun, 28100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
Yayik AM, Cesur S, Ozturk F, Ahiskalioglu A, Ay AN, Celik EC, Karaavci NC. Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Study. World Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;126:e779-e785. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.02.149. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
PMID: 30853517RESULTBajwa SJ, Haldar R. Pain management following spinal surgeries: An appraisal of the available options. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2015 Jul-Sep;6(3):105-10. doi: 10.4103/0974-8237.161589.
PMID: 26288544RESULTKilicaslan A, Aydin A, Kekec AF, Ahiskalioglu A. Sacral erector spinae plane block provides effective postoperative analgesia for pelvic and sacral fracture surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2020 May;61:109674. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.109674. Epub 2019 Dec 4. No abstract available.
PMID: 31812367RESULTChakraborty A, Chakraborty S, Sen S, Bhatacharya T, Khemka R. Modification of the sacral erector spinae plane block using an ultrasound-guided sacral foramen injection: dermatomal distribution and radiocontrast study. Anaesthesia. 2021 Nov;76(11):1538-1539. doi: 10.1111/anae.15549. Epub 2021 Jul 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 34309009RESULTMistry T, Sonawane K, Balasubramanian S, Balavenkatasubramanian J, Goel VK. Ultrasound-guided sacral multifidus plane block for sacral spine surgery: A case report. Saudi J Anaesth. 2022 Apr-Jun;16(2):236-239. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_723_21. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
PMID: 35431750RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bilge Olgun Keleş, M.D.
Giresun University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The patient did not know what was done to him/her because the block was performed before the patient woke up. The investigator who questioned postoperative pain and opioid consumption did not know to whom the block was performed.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2023
First Posted
September 7, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2023
Primary Completion
July 30, 2023
Study Completion
August 30, 2023
Last Updated
September 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Since it is the first study on this subject in the literature