NCT06026293

Brief Summary

Physical inactivity and poor dietary habits are associated with an increased risk of obesity and chronic disease (World Health Organization, 2019; Glanz and Bishop, 2010). Conversely, higher levels of total physical activity result in a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, breast and colon cancer, and diabetes (Kyu et al., 2016). Similarly, consumption of the minimum recommended level (600 g per day) of fruit and vegetables is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer (Ezzati et al., 2004). However, despite these recognized benefits, unhealthy diet and physical inactivity are still major contributors to poor health and rising health care costs. Worldwide, physical inactivity accounted for 13.4 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in 2013 and cost $53.8 billion to health systems and an additional $13.7 billion in productivity due to deaths attributable to physical inactivity (Ding et al., 2016). Pharmacoeconomics, or the economic evaluation of treatments aimed at maintaining the health of the population, is a set of evaluation models used to identify the value (convenience) and the overall economic impact of a possible treatment. The results of economic evaluations help decision makers inform their choice. Their advantage is that the result is obtained by applying known and validated models, and everyone can know the basis of the decision (evidence-based decision making). The clinical-economic value and the overall financial impact must be compared with the willingness to pay the related costs. Economic evaluations are a tool for defining the value of a medicine in terms of cost-opportunity, from the point of view of the patient, the NHS and society as a whole. The definition of "value" is very broad, multidimensional and includes concepts from many disciplines, beyond economics. Specifically, economic evaluations that take into consideration new medicines, innovative or not, the value is given by the marginal utility that the patient, the NHS and/or society can obtain from its acquisition. In this regard, the measurement of years of life gained in full quality of life (QALY - quality-adjusted life years) is widely applied to medicines in various regulatory contexts, albeit with the awareness that it is not able to capture all the elements that contribute to value (Carletto, A et al.; Drummond, M. F)

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
58

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 20, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 30, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 7, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2023

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 2, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

October 9, 2024

Status Verified

October 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

August 30, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 5, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Non-alcoholic fatty liver deseaseCost/effectivnessPhysical activity

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Cost/effectiveness Ratio

    to define the economic value in terms of CER (Cost/Effectiveness Ratio) and ICER (Incremental Cost/Effectivness Ratio) of physical exercise in the treatment of NAFLD in patients who already have comorbidities for metabolic/cardiometabolic diseases.

    3 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • long term foresight of an healthy policy

    3 years

Study Arms (1)

subjects that participates to a previous clinical trial

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The population was affected by NAFLD in the observation period (2018-2020), participating in health promotion activities by performing physical exercise under the supervision of the institution's kinesiologists

You may qualify if:

  • Being affected by NAFLD in the observation period (2018-2020)
  • Participating in health promotion activities by performing physical exercise under the supervision of the institution's kinesiologists

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient deceased
  • Patient who does not agree to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Irccs Saverio de Bellis

Castellana Grotte, Bari, 70013, Italy

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Polignano M, Bianco A, Guido D, Trisolini P, Franco I, Bonfiglio C, Giannelli G. Economic value and clinical association of a supervised lifestyle-improving program for MASLD. Front Pharmacol. 2026 Jan 16;16:1708451. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1708451. eCollection 2025.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseMotor Activity

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Fatty LiverLiver DiseasesDigestive System DiseasesBehavior

Study Officials

  • Maurizio Gaetano Polignano

    IRCCS "Saverio de Bellis"

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 30, 2023

First Posted

September 7, 2023

Study Start

July 20, 2023

Primary Completion

September 30, 2023

Study Completion

October 2, 2024

Last Updated

October 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-10

Locations