NCT06018272

Brief Summary

Background: Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is a serious mental disorder. Mentalization-based treatment (MBT) is one evidence-based treatment for individuals with BPD. Specifically, MBT has been highlighted for its effectiveness in reduction of suicidal and non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI). Yet, randomized-controlled trials (RCT) on MBT in outpatient settings compared with bona fide treatment (BFT) are still scarce and none has been conducted in Germany. The primary objective of this RCT is to investigate whether outpatient MBT is more effective in the reduction of crisis events (incidences of NSSI and suicide attempts) compared with BFT (namely psychodynamic or cognitive-behavioural psychotherapy) in Germany. Secondary, MBT's efficacy will be investigated with regard to cost-effectiveness, general and interpersonal functioning, BPD and general symptom severity, social adjustment, quality of life, reduction in psychotropic medication and therapy retention. Additionally, moderator as well as common and treatment specific mediator variables will be investigated. Study Design/ Study Population/ Methods: Across 5 study sites in Germany, 304 individuals of all genders from age 18 to 65 with a BPD diagnosis and NSSI or suicide attempts in the past will be asked to participate in the study for two years. In the first year, patients will receive either MBT or BFT (psychodynamic or cognitive behavioural psychotherapy) and will take part in continuous scientific assessments. Scientific assessments will continue after therapy completion up to a 12-moth follow up. As primary outcome, crisis events will be assessed via ecological momentary assessment (EMA) four times a week once per month during the first year and once every three months in the second year. Number of crisis events up to 2 years post randomization will be compared between treatment arms using a log-linear regression model following an intention-to-treat approach. Secondary outcomes, such as borderline and general symptom severity, will be assessed at several timepoints. A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) will be conducted with a societal perspective. Clinical Trial Rationale: This study investigates efficacy of MBT as BPD specific treatment in an outpatient setting compared with BFT in Germany. Results of this study can address a treatment gap in the German healthcare system, and inform about health economic aspects of BPD treatment as well as mechanisms of psychotherapeutic change.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
304

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
23mo left

Started Feb 2024

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress54%
Feb 2024Mar 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 17, 2023

Completed
13 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 28, 2024

Completed
3.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2027

Expected
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 31, 2028

Last Updated

May 10, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

3.6 years

First QC Date

August 17, 2023

Last Update Submit

May 8, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • change in crisis events assessed with Ecological Momentary Assessment with items based on the SHBQ (Gutierrez et al., 2001)

    composite score (non)suicidal self injury

    every second day during one week per month in the first year, and during one week every three months in the second year

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder assessed with the IPDE (Loranger et al., 1997) and BSL-23 (Wolf et al., 2009)

    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24; IPDE only at Month 24

  • Change in psychiatric symptom severity assessed with the DASS- 21 (Lovibond & Lovibond, 1995)

    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24

  • Change in health and disability assessed with WHODAS 2.0 Short Form (Üstün et al., 2010)

    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24

  • Change in personality funcitioning assessed with LPFS-BF (Hutsebaut et al., 2016)

    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24

  • Change in personality traits assessed with PID5BF+M (Bach et al., 2020)

    Day 0, Month 6, Month 12, Month 24

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (20)

  • Mentalizing as mediator of change assessed with the Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ; Müller et al., 2021)

    Month 6, Month 12

  • Therapeutic Agency Inventory (TAI; Huber et al., 2019)

    once a week in the first year and at Month 6 and Month 12

  • Group Questionnaire - short (GQ; Jensen, 2016)

    once a week in the first year and at Month 6 and Month 12

  • +17 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT)

EXPERIMENTAL
Behavioral: Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT)

Bona-Fide Treatment in Germany (BFT)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Behavioral: Bona-Fide Treatment in Germany (BFT)

Interventions

Patients in MBT will receive a maximum of 58 sessions in total. Of those, 30 are weekly individual sessions. 28 sessions are weekly group sessions conducted by two therapists, and consisting of 8 introductory sessions of group psychoeducation followed by 20 group therapy sessions. The duration of MBT is 12 months. MBT is manualized and relies on validating the emotional experience of patients that aims to promote mentalizing. The proposed mechanism of change in MBT is to stabilize mentalizing in certain focus areas in order to create a psychic buffer between affect and behaviour to foster affect regulation, reduce impulsivity and promote functional supportive relationships.

Mentalization-Based Treatment (MBT)

Patients in BFT will receive one to two weekly sessions of Bona-Fide-Treatment (Psychodynamic Therapy, PT, or Cognitive Behavioural Therapy, CBT) conducted by community experts delivered as short-term psychotherapy (\<24 sessions) or long-term psychotherapy (\>24 sessions). BFT can be delivered as individual, group or a combination of individual and group treatment as stated in the German psychotherapy regulations.

Bona-Fide Treatment in Germany (BFT)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Borderline Personality Disorder
  • non-suicidal self injury or suicide attempts in the past two years as indicated by the IPDE item "repeated suicidal behaviours, gestures, threats or self-harm", one of which has occurred in the past six months

You may not qualify if:

  • acute substance use disorder (exception: cannabis dependency)
  • diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizotypal personality disorder
  • bipolar I disorder (DSM-5)
  • cognitive impairment (IQ\<80) or evidence of organic brain disorder
  • BMI\<16.5
  • serious medical condition that will require hospitalization within the next year (e.g. cancer)
  • no sufficient German language abilities

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Psychologische Hochschule Berlin

Berlin, Germany

RECRUITING

Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Düsseldorf

Düsseldorf, Germany

NOT YET RECRUITING

Heidelberg University

Heidelberg, 69115, Germany

RECRUITING

Institute for Psychosocial Medicine, Psychotherapy and Psychooncology

Jena, Germany

NOT YET RECRUITING

Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Ulm

Ulm, Germany

NOT YET RECRUITING

Related Publications (46)

  • Bateman A, Fonagy P. Mentalization based treatment for borderline personality disorder. World Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;9(1):11-5. doi: 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2010.tb00255.x.

    PMID: 20148147BACKGROUND
  • Bateman A, Fonagy P. Effectiveness of partial hospitalization in the treatment of borderline personality disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Oct;156(10):1563-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.10.1563.

    PMID: 10518167BACKGROUND
  • Bateman A, Fonagy P. Randomized controlled trial of outpatient mentalization-based treatment versus structured clinical management for borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 2009 Dec;166(12):1355-64. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09040539. Epub 2009 Oct 15.

    PMID: 19833787BACKGROUND
  • Jorgensen CR, Freund C, Boye R, Jordet H, Andersen D, Kjolbye M. Outcome of mentalization-based and supportive psychotherapy in patients with borderline personality disorder: a randomized trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2013 Apr;127(4):305-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2012.01923.x. Epub 2012 Aug 17.

    PMID: 22897123BACKGROUND
  • Laurenssen EMP, Luyten P, Kikkert MJ, Westra D, Peen J, Soons MBJ, van Dam AM, van Broekhuyzen AJ, Blankers M, Busschbach JJV, Dekker JJM. Day hospital mentalization-based treatment v. specialist treatment as usual in patients with borderline personality disorder: randomized controlled trial. Psychol Med. 2018 Nov;48(15):2522-2529. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718000132. Epub 2018 Feb 26.

    PMID: 29478425BACKGROUND
  • Rossouw TI, Fonagy P. Mentalization-based treatment for self-harm in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;51(12):1304-1313.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.09.018.

    PMID: 23200287BACKGROUND
  • Storebo OJ, Stoffers-Winterling JM, Vollm BA, Kongerslev MT, Mattivi JT, Jorgensen MS, Faltinsen E, Todorovac A, Sales CP, Callesen HE, Lieb K, Simonsen E. Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.

    PMID: 32368793BACKGROUND
  • Wittchen H-U, Zaudig M, Fydrich T. Strukturiertes Klinisches Interview für DSM-IV (SKID I und SKID II). Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1997. https://doi.org/10.1026//0084-5345.28.1.68.

    RESULT
  • Raven J. Raven´s Progressive Matrices 2, Clinical Edition. 1st ed. München: Pearson; 2019.

    RESULT
  • Gutierrez PM, Osman A, Barrios FX, Kopper BA. Development and initial validation of the Self-harm Behavior Questionnaire. J Pers Assess. 2001 Dec;77(3):475-90. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7703_08.

  • Wolf M, Limberger MF, Kleindienst N, Stieglitz RD, Domsalla M, Philipsen A, Steil R, Bohus M. [Short version of the borderline symptom list (BSL-23): development and psychometric evaluation]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2009 Aug;59(8):321-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1104598. Epub 2009 Mar 9. German.

  • Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the Depression Anxiety & Stress Scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.

    RESULT
  • Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, Kennedy C, Epping-Jordan J, Saxena S, von Korff M, Pull C; WHO/NIH Joint Project. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Nov 1;88(11):815-23. doi: 10.2471/BLT.09.067231. Epub 2010 May 20.

  • Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, Bonsel G, Badia X. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

  • EuroQol Research Foundation. EQ-5D-5L User Guide Version 3.0: Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Https://EuroqolOrg/Publications/User-Guides 2019.

    RESULT
  • Kuyken W, Hayes R, Barrett B, Byng R, Dalgleish T, Kessler D, Lewis G, Watkins E, Brejcha C, Cardy J, Causley A, Cowderoy S, Evans A, Gradinger F, Kaur S, Lanham P, Morant N, Richards J, Shah P, Sutton H, Vicary R, Weaver A, Wilks J, Williams M, Taylor RS, Byford S. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy compared with maintenance antidepressant treatment in the prevention of depressive relapse or recurrence (PREVENT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Jul 4;386(9988):63-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62222-4. Epub 2015 Apr 20.

  • Stiglmayr C, Schmahl C, Bremner JD, Bohus M, Ebner-Priemer U. Development and psychometric characteristics of the DSS-4 as a short instrument to assess dissociative experience during neuropsychological experiments. Psychopathology. 2009;42(6):370-4. doi: 10.1159/000236908. Epub 2009 Sep 15.

  • Marks IM. Behavioural psychotherapy: Maudsley pocket book of clinical management. Wright/IOP Publishing; 1986.

    RESULT
  • Hutsebaut J, Feenstra DJ, Kamphuis JH. Development and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of a Brief Self-Report Questionnaire for the Assessment of the DSM-5 level of Personality Functioning Scale: The LPFS Brief Form (LPFS-BF). Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):192-7. doi: 10.1037/per0000159. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

  • Spielberger CD. State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory-2 (STAXI-2). Professional Manual. Tampa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1999.

    RESULT
  • Stangier U, Schuller J, Brahler E. Development and validation of a new instrument to measure social pain. Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 15;11(1):8283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87351-3.

  • Honecker H, Bertsch K, Spiess K, Krauch M, Kleindienst N, Herpertz SC, Neukel C. Impact of a Mechanism-Based Anti-Aggression Psychotherapy on Behavioral Mechanisms of Aggression in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Aug 5;12:689267. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.689267. eCollection 2021.

  • Bach B, Kerber A, Aluja A, Bastiaens T, Keeley JW, Claes L, Fossati A, Gutierrez F, Oliveira SES, Pires R, Riegel KD, Rolland JP, Roskam I, Sellbom M, Somma A, Spanemberg L, Strus W, Thimm JC, Wright AGC, Zimmermann J. International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1. Psychopathology. 2020;53(3-4):179-188. doi: 10.1159/000507589. Epub 2020 May 5.

  • Mehling WE, Acree M, Stewart A, Silas J, Jones A. The Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2). PLoS One. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):e0208034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208034. eCollection 2018.

  • Cloitre M, Shevlin M, Brewin CR, Bisson JI, Roberts NP, Maercker A, Karatzias T, Hyland P. The International Trauma Questionnaire: development of a self-report measure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):536-546. doi: 10.1111/acps.12956. Epub 2018 Sep 3.

  • Roberts NP, Cloitre M, Bisson J, Brewin CR. International trauma interview (ITI) for ICD- 11 PTSD and complex PTSD (Test Version 3.2). 2019.

    RESULT
  • Hutsebaut J, Kamphuis JH, Feenstra DJ, Weekers LC, De Saeger H. Assessing DSM-5-oriented level of personality functioning: Development and psychometric evaluation of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1). Personal Disord. 2017 Jan;8(1):94-101. doi: 10.1037/per0000197. Epub 2016 Jun 16.

  • Jensen J, Burlingame G. An item reduction analysis of the Group Questionnaire. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2018 Jun;55(2):144-150. doi: 10.1037/pst0000145.

  • Bradley MM, Lang PJ. Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 1994 Mar;25(1):49-59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9.

  • Kasper LA, Hauschild S, Berning A, Holl J, Taubner S. Development and validation of the Mentalizing Emotions Questionnaire: A self-report measure for mentalizing emotions of the self and other. PLoS One. 2024 May 6;19(5):e0300984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300984. eCollection 2024.

  • Ehrenthal JC, Zimmermann J, Brenk-Franz K, Dinger U, Schauenburg H, Brahler E, Strauss B. Evaluation of a short version of the Experiences in Close Relationships-Revised questionnaire (ECR-RD8): results from a representative German sample. BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 14;9(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00637-z.

  • Kendall PC, Howard BL, Hays RC. Self-Referent Speech and Psychopathology: The Balance of Positive and Negative Thinking 1989;13:583-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01176069.

    RESULT
  • Bateman A, Fonagy P. Mentalization-Based Treatment for Personality Disorders: A practical guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2016.

    RESULT
  • Hilsenroth MJ, Blagys MD, Ackerman SJ, Bonge DR, Blais MA. Measuring Psychodynamic-Interpersonal and Cognitive-Behavioral Techniques: Development of the Comparative Psychotherapy Process Scale. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training 2005;42:340-56.

    RESULT
  • Talia A, Muzi L. Therapist Attunement Scales Coding System (Unpublished Manuscript). University of Heidelberg 2017.

    RESULT
  • Eubanks CF, Muran JC, Safran J. Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS): Manual. New York: Unpublished manuscript, Mount Sinai-Beth Israel Medical Center; 2015.

    RESULT
  • Talia A, Miller-Bottome M. Patient Attachment Coding System, 2.0 (Unpublished manuscript). Deparment of Psychology: University of Copenhagen 2012.

    RESULT
  • Rozental A, Kottorp A, Forsstrom D, Mansson K, Boettcher J, Andersson G, Furmark T, Carlbring P. The Negative Effects Questionnaire: psychometric properties of an instrument for assessing negative effects in psychological treatments. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019 Sep;47(5):559-572. doi: 10.1017/S1352465819000018. Epub 2019 Mar 15.

  • Krause Jacob M, Abarzúa M, Silva M, Navarro D, Altimir Colao C. Psychotherapie aus der Sicht von Klienten mit Schizophrenie. Verhaltenstherapie & Psychosoziale Praxis 2016;47:63-76.

    RESULT
  • Loranger AW, Janca A, Sartorius N. Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorders: The ICD-10 international personality disorder examination (IPDE). Cambridge University Press; 1997.

    RESULT
  • Hatcher RL, Gillaspy JA. Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychotherapy Research. 2006; 16: 12-25.

    RESULT
  • Huber J, Nikendei C, Ehrenthal JC, Schauenburg H, Mander J, Dinger U. Therapeutic Agency Inventory: Development and psychometric validation of a patient self-report. Psychother Res. 2019 Oct;29(7):919-934. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2018.1447707. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

  • Muller S, Wendt LP, Zimmermann J. Development and Validation of the Certainty About Mental States Questionnaire (CAMSQ): A Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing Oneself and Others. Assessment. 2023 Apr;30(3):651-674. doi: 10.1177/10731911211061280. Epub 2021 Dec 14.

  • Campbell C, Tanzer M, Saunders R, Booker T, Allison E, Li E, O'Dowda C, Luyten P, Fonagy P. Development and validation of a self-report measure of epistemic trust. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 16;16(4):e0250264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250264. eCollection 2021.

  • Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004; 26: 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94.

    RESULT
  • Hauschild S, Taubner S, Vidalon Blachowiak T, Dinger U, Gundel H, Herpertz SC, Rademacher J, Strauss B, Storck T, Vassileva R, Burghaus I, Herbst M, Chen S, Nikendei C, Euler S, Volkert J. Mentalization-based treatment versus bona fide treatment for patients with borderline personality disorder in Germany (MAGNET): study protocol of a prospective, multi-centre randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 11;25(1):367. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06809-0.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Borderline Personality Disorder

Interventions

Mentalization-Based Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personality DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PsychotherapyBehavioral Disciplines and Activities

Study Officials

  • Svenja Taubner

    University Heidelberg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Dr. phil. Svenja Taubner

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 17, 2023

First Posted

August 30, 2023

Study Start

February 28, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2028

Last Updated

May 10, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations