NCT06017037

Brief Summary

The goal of this experimental medicine study is to examine the effect of increasing serotonin on reward processing in healthy volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.Does a subacute increase in serotonin influence the activation regions during reward learning
  2. 2.Does a subacute increase in serotonin influence behavioural markers of reward valuation (effort task), responsiveness (taste task) and learning (learning task)

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 15, 2023

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 19, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 30, 2023

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 30, 2023

Status Verified

May 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

May 15, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 23, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Reward & aversive learning: behavioural correlates

    Optimal choice learning rate of conditioned stimuli to win and loss outcomes. During an instrumental reinforcement learning task participant will complete trials with a pair of symbols (the valence will either be loss or win, which is implicit). One symbol will be high chance of that outcome (either win or loss depending on the valence of the pair) and the other low chance of the outcome. In the win pair the optimal choice is the high chance symbol (i.e. to win), in the loss pair the optimal choice is the low chance option (i.e. avoid loss). In each allocation group the proportion of participants making an optimal choice will be calculated on a trial-by-trial basis. This provide the learning rate outcome.

    Day 7-9 of treatment

  • Reward & aversive learning: neural correlates

    Activity of a network of brain regions associated with reward learning (during anticipation and outcome), in response to a positive \& negative outcomes in reward learning task. This will be the difference in BOLD activation in certain brain regions (pertinent to reward processing) between allocation groups during the anticipation stage and the outcome stage of the instrumental learning task.

    Day 7-9 of treatment

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Resting state

    Day 7-9 of treatment

  • Subjective rating of primary reward

    Day 0 and day 7-9 of treatment

  • Reward & aversive learning: behavioural volatile reward learning task: total money won

    day 7-9 of treatment

  • Motivational reward task

    day 7-9 of treatment

  • Reward & aversive learning: behavioural volatile reward learning task: learning rate

    day 7-9 of treatment

Study Arms (2)

Citalopram

EXPERIMENTAL

Citalopram 20mg p.o. once daily for 7-9 days

Drug: Citalopram 20mg

Placebo

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

Lactose p.o. once daily for 7-9 days

Drug: Placebo

Interventions

Citalopram 20mg tablets, encapsulated to aid blinding. To take per oral once daily for 7-9 days

Citalopram

Lactose monohydrate tablets encapsulated to aid blinding. To take per oral once daily for 7-9 days

Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the research
  • Aged between 18 to 65 years
  • Sufficient knowledge of English language to understand and complete study tasks

You may not qualify if:

  • Current or past probable diagnosis of psychiatric illness, according to DSM-5 criteria, requiring intervention by a healthcare professional, including but not limited to psychosis, bipolar disorder, major depression, OCD, PTSD, substance abuse disorder or any eating disorder
  • Current or past diagnosis of any significant personality disorder (e.g. borderline personality disorder) according to self-report
  • Diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactive disorder or autistic spectrum disorder that impairs daily functioning, requires pharmacotherapy or in the opinion of the study medic would affect the scientific integrity of the study
  • Current use of medication that might interact with the effects of citalopram or affect the scientific integrity of the study
  • Previous suicide attempt or previous prolonged period (e.g. \> 5 days) of thoughts to end life
  • Known contraindication to citalopram including: past allergic reaction to citalopram or any other medicines, diagnosis of a cardiovascular condition, glaucoma, type 1 or type 2 diabetes, diagnosis of epilepsy, previous diagnosis of angle-closure glaucoma, or current use of any other medication whose use interacts with citalopram (according to BNF guidance) e.g. associated with prolonged QT-interval
  • Any other current or past medical conditions which in the opinion of the study medic may interfere with the safety of the participant or the scientific integrity of the study including epilepsy/seizures, brain injury, hepatic or renal disease, diabetes, severe gastro-intestinal problems, Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours, neurological conditions
  • First-degree relative with a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum or other psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder
  • Severely underweight (BMI\<17) or very obese (BMI\>40) in a manner that renders them unsuitable for the study in the opinion of the study medic
  • Heavy use of cigarettes (smoke \> 20 cigarettes per day)
  • Heavy use of caffeine (drink \> 4 250ml cups/cans of coffee/energy drinks per day)
  • Lactose intolerance (due to the study involving administration of a lactose placebo tablet)
  • Known allergy to citric acid, sodium chloride, sucrose or quinine
  • Pregnancy (as determined by urine pregnancy test taken during the Part 2 screening visit), breast feeding or plans to become pregnant
  • past history of dependence on illicit substances or regular illicit substance use within previous three months
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Neurosciences building, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford hospital

Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Anhedonia

Interventions

Citalopram

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PropylaminesAminesOrganic ChemicalsNitrilesBenzofuransHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic Compounds

Study Officials

  • Catherine Harmer, PhD

    University of Oxford

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Alexander Smith, MBBS

CONTACT

Susannah Murphy, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 15, 2023

First Posted

August 30, 2023

Study Start

May 19, 2023

Primary Completion

May 1, 2024

Study Completion

May 1, 2024

Last Updated

August 30, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-05

Locations