REward Processing And Citalopram Study
REPAC
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this experimental medicine study is to examine the effect of increasing serotonin on reward processing in healthy volunteers. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- 1.Does a subacute increase in serotonin influence the activation regions during reward learning
- 2.Does a subacute increase in serotonin influence behavioural markers of reward valuation (effort task), responsiveness (taste task) and learning (learning task)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_1
Started May 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 30, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2024
CompletedAugust 30, 2023
May 1, 2023
12 months
May 15, 2023
August 23, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Reward & aversive learning: behavioural correlates
Optimal choice learning rate of conditioned stimuli to win and loss outcomes. During an instrumental reinforcement learning task participant will complete trials with a pair of symbols (the valence will either be loss or win, which is implicit). One symbol will be high chance of that outcome (either win or loss depending on the valence of the pair) and the other low chance of the outcome. In the win pair the optimal choice is the high chance symbol (i.e. to win), in the loss pair the optimal choice is the low chance option (i.e. avoid loss). In each allocation group the proportion of participants making an optimal choice will be calculated on a trial-by-trial basis. This provide the learning rate outcome.
Day 7-9 of treatment
Reward & aversive learning: neural correlates
Activity of a network of brain regions associated with reward learning (during anticipation and outcome), in response to a positive \& negative outcomes in reward learning task. This will be the difference in BOLD activation in certain brain regions (pertinent to reward processing) between allocation groups during the anticipation stage and the outcome stage of the instrumental learning task.
Day 7-9 of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Resting state
Day 7-9 of treatment
Subjective rating of primary reward
Day 0 and day 7-9 of treatment
Reward & aversive learning: behavioural volatile reward learning task: total money won
day 7-9 of treatment
Motivational reward task
day 7-9 of treatment
Reward & aversive learning: behavioural volatile reward learning task: learning rate
day 7-9 of treatment
Study Arms (2)
Citalopram
EXPERIMENTALCitalopram 20mg p.o. once daily for 7-9 days
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORLactose p.o. once daily for 7-9 days
Interventions
Citalopram 20mg tablets, encapsulated to aid blinding. To take per oral once daily for 7-9 days
Lactose monohydrate tablets encapsulated to aid blinding. To take per oral once daily for 7-9 days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the research
- Aged between 18 to 65 years
- Sufficient knowledge of English language to understand and complete study tasks
You may not qualify if:
- Current or past probable diagnosis of psychiatric illness, according to DSM-5 criteria, requiring intervention by a healthcare professional, including but not limited to psychosis, bipolar disorder, major depression, OCD, PTSD, substance abuse disorder or any eating disorder
- Current or past diagnosis of any significant personality disorder (e.g. borderline personality disorder) according to self-report
- Diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactive disorder or autistic spectrum disorder that impairs daily functioning, requires pharmacotherapy or in the opinion of the study medic would affect the scientific integrity of the study
- Current use of medication that might interact with the effects of citalopram or affect the scientific integrity of the study
- Previous suicide attempt or previous prolonged period (e.g. \> 5 days) of thoughts to end life
- Known contraindication to citalopram including: past allergic reaction to citalopram or any other medicines, diagnosis of a cardiovascular condition, glaucoma, type 1 or type 2 diabetes, diagnosis of epilepsy, previous diagnosis of angle-closure glaucoma, or current use of any other medication whose use interacts with citalopram (according to BNF guidance) e.g. associated with prolonged QT-interval
- Any other current or past medical conditions which in the opinion of the study medic may interfere with the safety of the participant or the scientific integrity of the study including epilepsy/seizures, brain injury, hepatic or renal disease, diabetes, severe gastro-intestinal problems, Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours, neurological conditions
- First-degree relative with a diagnosis of schizophrenia-spectrum or other psychotic disorder, or bipolar disorder
- Severely underweight (BMI\<17) or very obese (BMI\>40) in a manner that renders them unsuitable for the study in the opinion of the study medic
- Heavy use of cigarettes (smoke \> 20 cigarettes per day)
- Heavy use of caffeine (drink \> 4 250ml cups/cans of coffee/energy drinks per day)
- Lactose intolerance (due to the study involving administration of a lactose placebo tablet)
- Known allergy to citric acid, sodium chloride, sucrose or quinine
- Pregnancy (as determined by urine pregnancy test taken during the Part 2 screening visit), breast feeding or plans to become pregnant
- past history of dependence on illicit substances or regular illicit substance use within previous three months
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Neurosciences building, Department of Psychiatry, Warneford hospital
Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7JX, United Kingdom
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Catherine Harmer, PhD
University of Oxford
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 15, 2023
First Posted
August 30, 2023
Study Start
May 19, 2023
Primary Completion
May 1, 2024
Study Completion
May 1, 2024
Last Updated
August 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-05