A Decision Aid on End-of-life Care for Patients With Advanced COPD and Their Family
Effects of a Decision Support Intervention on End-of-life Care Planning in Patients With Advanced Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Their Family Members: A Mixed Method Approach
1 other identifier
interventional
226
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study aims to support EOL decision-making in patients with advanced COPD and their family members. A parallel two-arm single-blinded randomised controlled trial will be conducted to evaluate the effects of a specific decision support intervention. A total of 226 patients with advanced COPD and their designated family members will be recruited from hospital wards and outpatient clinics.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2025
CompletedFebruary 17, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.9 years
August 18, 2023
February 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Decisional conflict at T0
Decisional conflict regarding EOL care measured using The SURE test. It includes four items to be rated on a dichotomous format, with 0 (no) or 1 (yes). The total score ranged from 0 to 4, with a higher score means less decisional conflict.
Baseline
Decisional conflict at T1
Decisional conflict regarding EOL care measured using The SURE test. It includes four items to be rated on a dichotomous format, with 0 (no) or 1 (yes). The total score ranged from 0 to 4, with a higher score means less decisional conflict.
1-month post allocation
Decisional conflict at T2
Decisional conflict regarding EOL care measured using The SURE test. It includes four items to be rated on a dichotomous format, with 0 (no) or 1 (yes). The total score ranged from 0 to 4, with a higher score means less decisional conflict.
6-month post allocation
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Self-efficacy for ACP at T0
Baseline
Self-efficacy for ACP at T1
1-month post allocation
Self-efficacy for ACP at T2
6-month post allocation
Readiness for ACP at T0
Baseline
Readiness for ACP at T1
1-month post allocation
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALDecision Support Intervention
Control Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORHealth coaching
Interventions
The participants will receive two 60-minute consultation sessions delivered by a trained nurse in four weeks at home. Participant's family members will be encouraged to attend the sessions. In the first session, the nurse will explore the participant's understanding of the current health condition, introduce the concept of advance care planning and discuss their decisional needs for end-of-life care decision-making. In the second session, the nurse will ask the participants to complete a value clarification exercise individually.
The participants will receive two 60-minute health coaching sessions delivered by a trained nurse in four weeks at home. This intervention will focus on lifestyle modification and self-care management unrelated to the tested intervention content or outcomes.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- are aged 50 years or over
- have been diagnosed with COPD
- are cognitively sound (scored \> 5 on the validated Abbreviated Mental Test (Hong Kong version) \[AMT-HK\])
- meet at least two of the six specific clinical indicators related to advanced COPD in the Gold Standards Framework (GSF) Proactive Identification Guidance, 6th Edition
- can nominate a family member who would take part in their healthcare decision- making.
- are aged 18 years or over,
- can communicate in Cantonese,
- have at least one personal contact per week with the patient in the past 6 months and
- are willing to join the study. Family members will be excluded if they score \< 6 on the AMT-HK or are expecting to leave Hong Kong within the next 6 months.
You may not qualify if:
- non-communicable due to a severe hearing impairment, dysphasia or a language barrier;
- are receiving palliative care services or
- have already completed ACP or an advance directive.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Food and Health Bureau, Hong Konglead
- Hospital Authority, Hong Kongcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Prince of Wales Hospital
Hong Kong, China
Tai Po Hospital
Hong Kong, China
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helen Chan, Ph.D.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2023
First Posted
August 23, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion
August 3, 2025
Study Completion
August 31, 2025
Last Updated
February 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data will be shared upon request