Effects of Different Oxygen Devices in Hypoxemic COPD Patients
Effects of Supplemental Oxygen Delivery Via Portable Oxygen Concentrator (Activox™4L) vs. Liquid Oxygen Device in Hypoxemic COPD Patients - a Non-inferiority Study
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Taken recent literature together, there is a sufficient number of trials investigating the effect of different oxygen devices. However, studies comparing oxygen delivery via portable oxygen concentrator (POC) and liquid oxygen device (LOD) with appropriate exercise testing and sufficient power are missing. Given that walking is the most important activity of daily life to preserve the maintenance and to participate in social life, we aim to investigate the effects of two different oxygen delivery systems during walking in hypoxemic COPD patients (POC vs. LOD). The endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) is well validated for measuring endurance walking capacity in COPD patients with good repeatability. The advantage of this test over the 6MWT is that the ESWT is performed at 85% of the individual maximum which is close to the intensity of typical daily activities. Due to the fact that the ESWT enables us to determine the maximum duration of exercise and to compare values at isotime (at the point of time when the shortest of the 3 ESWTs ends), we use the ESWT as exercise test in our trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 20, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedAugust 21, 2017
August 1, 2017
3 months
December 1, 2016
August 16, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in oxygen Saturation during endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) compared between POC (concentrator) and LOD (liquid oxygen)
ESWT is designed to assess the Maximum Walking Duration that can be sustained at 85% of individual Maximum capacity. Therefore, outcome Parameter will also be assessed at the individual end of the ESWT.
Change from baseline to the individual end of ESWT (until exhaustion, max. 20 minutes)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in Breathing frequency
Change from baseline to the individual end of ESWT (until exhaustion, max. 20 minutes)
Change in Inspiratory capacity
Change from baseline to the individual end of ESWT(until exhaustion, max. 20 minutes)
Endurance shuttle walk distance
at the end of ESWT (until exhaustion, max. 20 minutes)
Change in perceived Dyspnea
Change from baseline to the individual end of ESWT (until exhaustion, max. 20 minutes)
Change in partial pressure of carbon dioxide
Change from baseline to the individual end of ESWT (until exhaustion, max. 20 minutes)
Study Arms (2)
ESWT order: 1.liquid oxygen, 2. concentrator
EXPERIMENTALPatients will start with the endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) by using supplemental Oxygen from a portable liquid Oxygen device (Companion) and continue on the day after with ESWT by using supplemental Oxygen from a portable concentrator.
ESWT order: 1. concentrator, 2. liquid oxygen
EXPERIMENTALPatients will start with the endurance shuttle walk test (ESWT) by using supplemental Oxygen from a concentrator and continue on the day after with ESWT by using supplemental Oxygen from a portable liquid Oxygen device.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- COPD patients (GOLD stage III to IV) with hypoxemia at rest or during exercise (paO2\<60mmHg)
- Participation in an inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation program (Schön Klinik BGL)
- Written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Signs of acute exacerbation
- Any orthopedic or neurological disabilities that prevent patient from walking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Landlead
- ResMedcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land
Schönau am Königssee, 83471, Germany
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head physician of the department of Pneumology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 1, 2016
First Posted
December 20, 2016
Study Start
December 1, 2016
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
August 21, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08