The Efficacy of Metacognitive Skills Training in the Context of Forensic Psychiatric Care
Does Group-Based Metacognitive Skills Training Reduce Jumping to Conclusions Bias of Patients With Psychotic Disorders in the Context of Forensic Psychiatric Care
1 other identifier
interventional
85
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Deficiencies in social cognition are part of the core symptomatology of psychotic disorders. And deficiencies in social cognition, the closely related concept of metacognition, and, for example, paranoid attitudes are all associated with violence. The link between social cognition and violence is also observed through rehabilitation, as both group-based Social Cognition Interaction Training (SCIT) and group-based Metacognitive Skills Training (MCT) have reduced violent behavior in patients with psychotic disorders. Thus, a better knowledge of social cognition and its rehabilitation in psychotic disorders can help to reduce risky behavior and to rehabilitate the significant social difficulties often found in psychotic disorders. This research study aims to examine factors underlying the efficacy of group-based MCT. The goal of the metacognitive skills training group developed by Moritz and partners is to strengthen the social and metacognitive skills of the patients participating in the group. The group consists of 10 sessions during which exercises and discussion are emphasized. The themes of the group sessions are, for example, jumping to conclusions -bias, empathy, and memory. Detailed information is available from the MCT website (https://clinical-neuropsychology.de/metacognitive\_training-psychosis/). Overall there is meta-analysis-level evidence for the moderate effectiveness of MCT on positive symptoms of psychotic illnesses, such as delusions. Prior studies have argued that the unique factor underpinning MCT's efficacy is its impact on various cognitive biases, and that participating in the group especially reduces patients' tendency to jump to conclusions, which is a cognitive style associated with delusions and deficits in social perception and reasoning. As delusionality is related to the risk of violence, these results form a logical link between jumping to conclusions, delusionality, and violence. But the results regarding the effectiveness of MCT are still somewhat conflicting, and studies seem to be of varying quality. Additional longitudinal research and research related to the jumping to conclusion bias are also needed. The hypothesis regarding this study is that the MCT group reduces patients' tendency to jump to conclusions. These reductions are presumed to be associated in one-year follow-up with fewer mood symptoms, delusions, paranoia, and more psychological flexibility.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable schizophrenia
Started Sep 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable schizophrenia
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
May 14, 2024
May 1, 2024
3.3 years
August 15, 2023
May 13, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Jumping to conclusions bias
The bias is measured using a revised version of the beads task. This is a test of optimal performance, meaning that both low and high scores can be problematic.
For the intervention group, the measurement is done before the group and nine months after completion. For the control groups, the time interval is one year.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Paranoia and psychotic experiences
For the intervention group, the measurement is done before the group and nine months after completion. For the control groups, the time interval is one year.
Mood symptoms
For the intervention group, the measurement is done before the group and nine months after completion. For the control groups, the time interval is one year.
Psychological flexibility
For the intervention group, the measurement is done before the group and nine months after completion. For the control groups, the time interval is one year.
Study Arms (3)
Intervention group
EXPERIMENTALPatients with a psychosis spectrum disorder participating in the group-based metacognitive skills training and receiving treatment as usual
Patient controls
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients with a psychosis spectrum disorder receiving standard long-term care in the hospital
Non-patient controls
NO INTERVENTIONControl group consisting of test subjects without a diagnosis of psychosis spectrum disorder
Interventions
The goal of the metacognitive skills training group developed by Moritz and co. is to strengthen the social and metacognitive skills of the patients participating in the group. The group consists of 10 sessions during which exercises and discussion are emphasized. The themes of the group sessions are, for example, jumping to conclusions -bias, empathy, and memory. Detailed information is available from the MCT website (https://clinical-neuropsychology.de/metacognitive\_training-psychosis/). Overall there is meta-analysis-level evidence for the moderate effectiveness of MCT on positive symptoms of psychotic illnesses, such as delusions. Prior studies have argued that the unique factor underpinning MCT's efficacy is its impact on various cognitive biases, and that participating in the group especially reduces patients' tendency to jump to conclusions, which is a cognitive style associated with delusions and deficits in social perception and reasoning.
Medicinal treatment deemed appropriate by the attending physician, psychiatric ward treatment, and others forms of treatment recommended to the patients based on their treatment plans (e.g., work therapy, dialectical behavior therapy, talk therapy)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Willingness to participate in a scientific study
- Diagnosis of a psychosis spectrum disorder
- Finnish language skills due to questionnaires and psychological tests being in Finnish
You may not qualify if:
- Psychosis that severely deteriorates the ability to function
- Cognitive problems that severely deteriorate the ability to function
- Guardianship established for personal matters
- Willingness to participate in a scientific study
- Self-assessed sufficient Finnish language skills due to questionnaires and psychological tests being in Finnish
- Diagnosis of a psychosis spectrum disorder
- Cognitive problems that severely interferes with functioning
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Jyvaskylalead
- Vanha Vaasa Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Vanha Vaasa Hospital
Vaasa, Finland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Raimo Lappalainen, PhD
University of Jyvaskyla
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2023
First Posted
August 22, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
May 14, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Ownership of the data will reside with the University of Jyväskylä and Vanha Vaasa Hospital. The data are managed by the Ph.D. student, the PI, and the rest of the research team. Other researchers can use the data; however, it requires a research plan and the permission of the research team. Principally, the Ph.D. student, the PI, or someone from the research team will be one of the co-authors in all publications written from the data.