NCT06000124

Brief Summary

For the elderly using plyometric training, there are very few studies on strengthening the explosive power of the lower limbs of the elderly. For example, past studies have explored the effect of high-speed and low-speed plyometric training on the improvement of muscle contraction speed in the elderly over 60 years old. From the past researches, the study found that compared with low-speed training, High-speed training can not only improve muscle strength, but also effectively increase muscle speed and improve life functions. However, studies using plyometric training to improve lower body balance in older adults are scarce and the evidence is scant. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the clinical benefits of plyometric training for improving the balance ability of the lower limbs in the elderly.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
38

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 14, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2023

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 28, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 21, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 24, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

May 28, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 21, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • 30-second sit-to-stand test

    1 Instruct the patient: (1) Sit in the middle of the chair. (2) Place your hands on the opposite shoulder crossed, at the wrists. (3) Keep your feet flat on the floor. (4) Keep your back straight, and keep your arms against your chest. (5) On "Go," rise to a full standing position, then sit back down again. (6) Repeat this for 30 seconds. 2 On the word "Go," begin timing. If the patient must use his/her arms to stand, stop the test. Record "0" for the number and score. 3 Count the number of times the patient comes to a full standing position in 30 seconds. If the patient is over halfway to a standing position when 30 seconds have elapsed, count it as a stand. 4 Record the number of times the patient stands in 30 seconds.

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 10 weeks

  • time up and go test (TUG)

    Patients wear their regular footwear and can use a walking aid, if needed. Begin by having the patient sit back in a standard arm chair and identify a line 3 meters, or 10 feet away, on the floor. 1 Instruct the patient:When I say "Go," I want you to: (1). Stand up from the chair. (2). Walk to the line on the floor at your normal pace. (3). Turn. (4). Walk back to the chair at your normal pace. (5). Sit down again.2 On the word "Go," begin timing. 3 Stop timing after patient sits back down. 4 Record time.

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 10 weeks

  • functional reach test (FRT)

    Ascertaining dynamic balance.In standing, measures the distance between the length of an outstretched arm in a maximal forward reach, while maintaining a fixed base of support. This information is correlated with risk of falling.

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 10 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • lower extremity explosiveness test

    From enrollment to the end of treatment at 10 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Plyometric exercises training

EXPERIMENTAL

High knee lifts, squat jumps, lunge cross jumps, squat jumping lunges, and squat jump twists are examples of plyometric exercises suitable for older adults.

Other: Plyometric exercises

Regulation exercises program

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The regulated exercise program includes the use of elastic bands, Qigong, and dance et al.

Other: Regulation Exercises Program

Interventions

High knee lifts, squat jumps, lunge cross jumps, squat jumping lunges, and squat jump twists are examples of plyometric exercises suitable for older adults.

Plyometric exercises training

The regulated exercise program includes the use of elastic bands, Qigong, and dance et al.

Regulation exercises program

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years - 89 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy elderly individuals aged 65 to 89 years, including both healthy older adults and pre-frail individuals.
  • Able to perform activities of daily living independently at home and in the community

You may not qualify if:

  • Severe neurological and musculoskeletal disorders of the lower limbs
  • Severe cardiovascular disease
  • Vestibular deficit
  • Medication affects or improves balance ability

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jiuzhuang Community Development Association

Taipei, Nangang, 11572, Taiwan

Location

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Plyometric Exercise

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Exercise TherapyRehabilitationAftercareContinuity of Patient CarePatient CareTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesPhysical Conditioning, HumanExerciseMotor ActivityMovementMusculoskeletal Physiological PhenomenaMusculoskeletal and Neural Physiological Phenomena

Study Officials

  • Chueh-Ho Lin, PhD

    Taipei Medical University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
All subjects were randomly assigned to either the control or experimental group to receive their respective exercise programs. The outcomes assessor was blinded to the group allocation of each participant during baseline and post-intervention assessments. No group assignment information was provided to the care providers.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The experimental group underwent plyometric training three times a week, performing three rounds each session, for a total intervention period of 10 weeks. The control group, on the other hand, engaged in regular exercises during the same intervention period. Before and after the training program, both groups underwent assessments to evaluate their balance abilities, which included the 30-second sit-to-stand test, time up and go test (TUG), functional reach test (FRT), and lower extremity explosiveness test.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 28, 2023

First Posted

August 21, 2023

Study Start

February 14, 2023

Primary Completion

April 30, 2023

Study Completion

April 30, 2023

Last Updated

August 24, 2023

Record last verified: 2022-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All collected IPD will be shared with other researchers upon reasonable request.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
starting in August 2023
Access Criteria
The datasets generated in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. PO-CHENG,CHIANG will be review requests.

Locations